Prisoner of opinion, hostage, war prisoner : citizen known as Julian Paul Assange (according to the media born : 03/07/1971)

Prison : According to the media Belmarsh



Prisoner Number : According to the media and Belmarsh A 93 79 AY

Subject: According to the media Request for information on mandate representation in the case EAW 131226-10 

According to the story-telling : European Arrest Warrant File No. AM 131226-10 :
File No. RCJ CO/1925/2011 

Julian Assange SOS

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/julian-assange-sos-pidancet-barri%25C3%25A8re-v%25C3%25A9ronique/

In the Assange case, the human rights association has filed a complaint with the judicial institutions of sovereign countries that respect the UN Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights :

1 complaint in the name of sovereign peoples for the safeguarding of democracy, the sovereignty of states and to demand the immediate release of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange, aka Julian Paul Hawkins, aka Mendax, aka…. This complaint has been lodged with most of the judiciary institutions: Tanzani, Mali, Tunisia, Russia, USA, Belarus, UK, Germany, China, etc. Copies have been sent to many parliamentarians and the press. It is in open source.

What WJJA has legally demonstrated in the Assange case

In its complaint, its fifteen release requests and its reports WJJA has legally demonstrated :

• that the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange, aka Julian Paul Hawkins, aka Mendax, aka… was abducted by an entity of unknown legal form called Mountbatten-Windsor which runs a government entity of unknown legal form called the City of London Corporation on the territory of the sovereign country of the United Kingdom. The City of London Corporation runs the governmental entity of unknown legal nature called the Virginia Corporation in the United States and most governmental bodies of unknown legal form in the Dominions.



• that the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange, aka Julian Paul Hawkins, aka Mendax, aka… is being held incommunicado in a « Dark Place » and tortured as a hostage of the entity of unknown legal form known as « Mountbatten-Windsor », an entity exercising power in the United Kingdom through the City of London Corporation and the Navigation Act of 1660.

• that the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange, aka Julian Paul Hawkins, aka Mendax, aka… has no official birth name. He has no official identity. The birth certificate of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange does not match the official birth certificate issued by the Australian authorities. The citizen known as Julian Paul Assange himself attests that the name he bears is a pseudonym in an official Ecuadorian document countersigned by a consul. Julian Paul Assange's birth identity is unknown and he is a citizen without a name. He therefore has no officially legitimate family and no nationality.

• To date, no one is able to say what the legal birth identity and nationality of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange, aka Julian Paul Hawkins, aka Mendax, aka… is except the criminals who kidnapped him, held him incommunicado and tortured him.

• To date, no one can give the birth names of the legal ascendants and legal descendants of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange except the criminals who kidnapped him, hold him incommunicado and torture him.

• To this day, no one can determine what legal financial assets the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange, aka Julian Paul Hawkins, aka Mendax, aka… owns except the criminals who kidnapped him, are holding him incommunicado and torture him.

• To date, no one can determine the property holdings, estate property of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange, aka Julian Paul Hawkins, aka Mendax, aka…. except the criminals who kidnapped him, are holding him incommunicado and torture him.

• To date, no one can determine what moral or intellectual assets the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange, aka Julian Paul Hawkins, aka Mendax, aka… except the criminals who kidnapped him, are holding him incommunicado and torture him.

• To date, no one can say whether Julian Paul Assange's parents are alive or, like him, hostages of the criminals who was kidnapping him. No one can say what the birth identity of Julian Assange's parents or children is, since he himself has no birth identity. To this day, no one can say whether Julian Assange aka Julian Paul Assange, aka Mendax has children and whether these children are not, like him, hostages of the criminals who are sequestering him in secret and torturing him.

• During the hearing on..., the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange, aka... said clearly and publicly that he had been robbed of his « DNA Children ». Was he raped? Was his sperm stolen by those holding him hostage for artificial insemination by a surrogate mother he did not choose? Was he forced, under threat, by the criminals holding him hostage to have a child with a woman he did not choose? If this is the case, it means that the heir or heirs of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange have and will, as their father, also have hostage status.

Prisoners of war and hostages are always citizens who represent a bargaining chip for those who kidnap and hold them. They can be held for ransom, used to blackmail their relatives or a sovereign country, used for embezzlement or inheritance, used as « property act », to provide access to bank accounts and be used as shields that allow their captors to annex territories that do not belong to them.

• WJJA has legally demonstrated that Elizabeth Bowes Lyon, aka queen Elisabeth, has no legitimacy on the English throne.

• WJJA has legally demonstrated that the members of the so-called Mountbatten-Windsor family, an entity of unknown legal form, have no legal birth identity and are not the legal heirs to the British Empire and the English Crown.

• Indeed, the legal entity of unknown form called Mountbatten-Windsor and Elisabeth Bowes Lyons aka Queen Elisabeth usurp the office of monarch of England.

In view of these facts, it is therefore legitimate to think that the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange aka Julian Paul Hawkins, aka Mendax, aka… could be an heir to the British Empire, i.e. a Plantagenet descendant, a Tudor descendant, a Stuart descendant, a Romanov descendant, a Bonaparte descendant, a Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderbourg-Glücksbourg descendant, a Navarrese descendant, etc., used as a hostage-shield and bargaining chip.

As the usurpation of the office of monarch on the English throne began with George I, it is legitimate to assume that other royal offspring, legal heirs to the English crown, could have been, could be, can be, hostages to the entity of unknown form Mountbatten-Windsor since several generations.

If this assumption is correct, it means that many countries can be blackmailed by the entity of unknown legal form called « Mountbatten-Windsor » which runs the City of London Corporation UK - State of Virginia (Washington DC) USA : Russia, Germany, France, Denmark, etc…

As the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange was kidnapped and tortured by the entity of unknown legal form « Mountbatten-Windsor » runing the City of London Corporation UK - State of Virginia (Washington DC) USA and sequesters him in secret, he can only be imprisoned in a Dark Place.

• WJJA has proven that the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange, aka Julian Paul Hawkins, aka Mendax, aka is sequestered in secret in a Dark Place. He may have already imprisoned ant had been torture in Guantanamo as the Mountbatten-Windsor entity that kidnapped him runs the State of Virginia (Washington DC) - USA, via the Navigation Act of 1660 and all American presidents. Jo Biden is an employee of the entity of unknown legal form « Mountbatten-Windsor » running the City of London Corporation UK - State of Virginia (Washington DC) USA as all American presidents are.
  

What is a Dark Place

Contrary to popular belief, a « Dark Place », an illegal prison built by private entities that do not respect any law, is not necessarily a classic prison building, even if some

« Dark Places » are prisons like Guantanamo or wings of privatised prisons. They are, most often, small structures housing a limited number of prisoners, sometimes only one, depending on their status and the abuse that those who illegally confine them in secret wish to inflict on them. A Dark Place can be a building in the city centre, a disused factory, a swimming pool, a hospital (usually a psychiatric hospital), a wealthy villa, a castle, an isolated flat, a small building in an innocuous dormitory town, a boat (floating Dark Place), or even a beautiful villa by the sea.

The objective of the kidnap sponsors is to create a spatio-temporal rupture in the kidnape in order to obtain an unwavering submission that will allow them to make him/her perform actions that serve their interests or to blackmail his/her relatives. To accentuate this psycho-pathological disorientation, the perpetrators apply a series of techniques listed in the Biderman Charter.

To reinforce the impact of these techniques, the hostage is regularly moved from one place of detention to another in planes, usually belonging to private companies, which the Americans have dubbed the « Guantanamo Express » (see « The Rendition » Project https://www.therenditionproject.org.uk). They are also called ghost planes. « Dark places » exist in all countries.

The hostage may also be placed under house arrest, under chemical straitjacket, electronic bracelet and constant surveillance, in strategically chosen locations, which may be in the city centre, with some semblance of autonomy, including financial autonomy, through payment cards issued in the name of companies or in the name of his captors.

Nouveau paragraphe

 Pinot, Mitterrand, Védrine, decorated with the Francisque of Pétain

 Statuts Francisque : Décret n° 2655 du 31/06/1942 approuvant les statut de la Francisque - JORF des 24 et 25 Août 1942

After the war, Barbie was protected and worked by the Americans - First obstruction to the law regarding the nazi criminal Klaus Barbie

Rome Statute of International Criminal Court - Article 70

Offences against the administration of justice

1. The Court shall have jurisdiction over the following offences against its administration of justice when committed intentionally:

(a) Giving false testimony when under an obligation pursuant to article 69, paragraph 1, to tell the truth;

(b) Presenting evidence that the party knows is false or forged;

(c) Corruptly influencing a witness, obstructing or interfering with the attendance or testimony of a witness, retaliating against a witness for giving testimony or destroying, tampering with or interfering with the collection of evidence;

(d) Impeding, intimidating or corruptly influencing an official of the Court for the purpose of forcing or persuading the official not to perform, or to perform improperly, his or her duties;

(e) Retaliating against an official of the Court on account of duties performed by that or another official;

(f) Soliciting or accepting a bribe as an official of the Court in connection with his or her official duties.

https://www.icc-cpi.int/resource-library/documents/rs-eng.pdf

1948. Klaus Barbie, aka Klaus Altmann, aka Adler, gives an interview to the newspaper Samedi Soir about the Caluire affair and the arrest of Jean Moulin. In this interview, he confirms Hardy's betrayal. The DST is informed of the presence of Klaus Barbie in Germany. 14 May 1948. Two DST agents interrogate Klaus Barbie in Frankfurt during 3 days : Police Commissioner Bibes and Charles Lehrman. The questioning concerns René Hardy's role in the Caluire affair. As far as Moulin is concerned, he says he did not interrogate him but transferred him to Paris. In fact, Moulin was allegedly tortured and died in the villa requisitioned in Neuilly by the head of the Gestapo, Karl Boemelburg. Barbie was allegedly photographed without her knowledge during the three days of interrogation. Klaus Barbie already works for the Office of Policy Coordination (OPC - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Policy_Coordination) and the Counter Intelligent Corps

(CIC - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterintelligence_Corps)

On May 3, Technical Specialist Joseph Vidal, the man at ele HQ who knew the Barbie-Merk history better than anyone else, provided EueOM with the background of the Barbie case. Vidal's cable began: « Klaus Barbie, an ex-informant of this organization, was employed by ele from May 1947 until May 1949 in Region XII

(Augsburg). During the occupation of France by the Germans Barbie was the chief of the Gestapo at Lyon

* * * Vidal summarized Barbie's use as an informant, including his actions « in the French Zone, » the deposi- tions taken by French authorities, and HQ's order to Region XII to drop Barbie as an informant following the May 1949 public allegations against him. »

Klaus Barbie - Attorney General’ Report - United States Government

https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/criminal-hrsp/legacy/2011/02/04/08-02-83barbie-rpt.pdf

About police commissioner Bibes

http://www.aassdn.org/site/index.php?option=com_mtree&task=viewlink&link_id=137&Itemid=

http://theses.univ-lyon2.fr/documents/getpart.php?id=lyon2.2000.chantin_r&part=18462

1949. The media locate Klaus Barbie in Munich, Germany. He moved freely in the American occupation zone.

The Lyon resistance fighters petition the US Embassy to have Barbie handed over to them for trial.

24/05/1949. American agent Eugen Kolb interrogates Klaus Barbie who admits to torture but denies having tortured. In his report Eugen Kolb concludes that belonging to the Gestapo does not make Barbie a criminal. However, the victims of torture are formal : Barbie supervised the interrogations and the torture. Under the Rome Statute and the Convention against Torture, he is a criminal against humanity.

« In the 1950's, France twice sentenced him to death in absentia for war crimes. Mr. Barbie, 69 years old, is awaiting trial on charges of torturing and killing hundreds of people and rounding up thousands more to be shipped to Nazi death camps.

Former United States agents have said American intelligence groups hired Mr. Barbie to provide information about Communist activities in Europe and then helped him escape to Bolivia.

Mr. Kolb said on the BBC public affairs program ''Panorama'' that when American officials first questioned Mr. Barbie in 1947, they knew he was wanted for his Gestapo activities. But Mr. Kolb said they thought Mr. Barbie was wanted for minor crimes.

Another former intelligence officer, Ed Dobringhaus, said American agents set up Mr. Barbie and his family in the southern German town of Augsburg, complete with an office and secretary. « We went overboard to be nice to that guy,'' he said. ''We went out drinking beer once in a while. » Questioned and Freed in '47.

Earl Browning, who headed the intelligence agency's office in Frankfurt, said he saw Mr. Barbie's name on a list of agents late in 1947 and ordered him arrested. Mr. Barbie was taken to an interrogation center in Oberursel, Germany, questioned and freed a few months later, Mr. Browning said

.

Mr. Barbie then went back to work for United States intelligence, and Mr. Kolb recalled him as ‘« a very shrewd, extremely intelligent, very capable professional. »

Beginning in 1949, France appealed to John McCloy, then United States High Commissioner in Germany, for word of Mr. Barbie's whereabouts. Nothing came of the requests.

In 1951 the United States decided to stop using Mr. Barbie as an agent, but Mr. Kolb said Mr. Barbie was not turned over to the French because it was felt the French intelligence agencies had been penetrated by Communist agents.

In February 1951, the BBC said, Mr. Barbie was placed in the hands of a counterintelligence agency officer, Col. James C. Milano, and taken across the border to Salzburg, Austria, in a United States Army truck.

From Salzburg, the BBC said, Mr. Barbie was sent to Genoa, Italy, where he boarded a ship for South America. Herbert Bechtold, a German-born officer in the counterintelligence agency who became Mr. Barbie's « handler », was asked if he questioned the morality of the hiring a man like Mr. Barbie by the United States. « I am not in a position to pass judgment on that, » Mr. Bechtold replied. « I was just following orders ». »

https://www.nytimes.com/1983/07/06/world/ex-us-agents-tell-of-efforts-to-help-barbie.html

Until 1951, Klaus Barbie worked for the CIC and therefore for the USA. He lives with his family in a house in Augsburg which is secured by the CIC. His mission would be to interrogate suspects and turn enemy agents. His action would focus on the Bavarian Communist Party and the Soviet Union.

« Barbie is afraid of the French. Her situation has become precarious. He is on the search lists of HICOG and the German police. If he were arrested for a minor offence or as a result of a denunciation, HICOG would be informed and his extradition would follow immediately, according to the SIC. However, what the Americans fear most of all is that the French will make Barbie talk about his activities within the CIC and that he will reveal the anti-French operations sponsored by the American intelligence service. They fear that Barbie will reveal what he knows about the workings of the CIC itself. Because he knows a lot and the CIC staff is aware of this: "Barbie knows more about the CIC than any of the officers in the service.

(…)

It was therefore decided to evacuate it to South America. Barbie has been requesting this since September. In December her case became a hot topic. The management of Region XII, to which he belong, suggest that take him the « Rat route ».

France United States, 50 years of dirty tricks - Fabrizio Calvi/Frédéric Laurent - Albin Michel - 2004

The Nazis used several escape routes. The « Rat Route » was allegedly set up by two officers of the 430th CIC : James Milano and Paul Lyon. Most of the Nazi escape networks after the Second World War were set up by Vatican prelates. The first escape network was created before the end of the war by the Austrian bishop Alois Hudal. It was supported by the Secretary of State Montini, the future Paul VI. Numerous religious humanitarian organisations lent him a hand. Montini provides false identity papers and travel documents through the Pontifical Commission for International Assistance and Charity. The USA seems to have complete control over the network of Father Krunoslav Dragonovic (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krunoslav_Draganović) who runs the San Girolamo Institute in Rome, a seminary for young Croats. Dragonovic is prosecuted for war crimes by the Tito government. Krunoslav Dragonovic is said to be connected to two American officers stationed in Italy: Colonel C. Findley and Major Simcock. He is said to be protected by Dr Migliore, one of the heads of the Italian Secret Service. More than 30,000 people are said to have used its escape networks. Main destinations : North and South America, Australia, Spain, England. Towards the end of the 1950s, only three destinations were proposed : the Middle East, South America and North America. The CIC funds the pipeline and pays $1000 to $1400 per defector.

« On 9 March, the Barbie family, accompanied by two CIC agents, left Germany by train for Salzburg. Three days later, they arrive in Genoa. They were met at the station by Dragonovic, picked up and driven to an little hotel near the harbour; Neagoy and Gray remained in Genoa to monitor the fugitive's departure until the end. On 16 March, Barbie and his family receive safe-conducts from the International Red Cross on behalf of Altmann. They can go to the Bolivian Consulate in Genoa where they were receive immigrant visas. To obtain them, Barbie presented documents from the travel office of the American High Commissioner and from the International Red Cross. On his Visa, Altmann (Barbie) was born on 25 October 1915 (he was two years younger) in Kronstadt, Germany. The city does not exist! There is only one Kronstadt in Russia. A few days later, on 19 March, Dragonovic also obtained Argentine transit visas for them (No. 14218), signed by the Consul General. They can now leave Italy for Buenos Aires. On 23 March, Barbie and her family boarded an Italian ship, the Corrientes, and left Italy for Argentina, where they arrived on 10 April. On 27 March, Neagoy noted in a report : « The operation went without incident. On 3 April, the 66 CIC headquarters concluded : «  This case is considered closed ». » In Buenos Aires, Barbie and her family spend ten days at the Hotel El Dora before heading to Bolivia. The penniless Klaus-Altmann-Barbie works in a sawmill in the middle of a mahogany forest at an altitude of two thousand meters. A few years later, he became director and then manager of various companies, including the only maritime company in Bolivia, Transmaritima Boliviana. In 1966, he was the representative in Germany of the German arms company Merex AG. Since 1957, Barbie has been a Bolivian national. He has a « diplomatic passport » and travels. The FBI monitors his movements in the USA. He was reported in West Germany and France, where he said he laid a wreath on the grave of Jean Moulin, « my best enemy ».

Barbie is part of a network of former Nazis that spans over the Latin America. A CIA report, dated March 1967, mentions his links with former Major Otto Skorzeny, a key figure in the clandestine action of former Nazis. On 13 February 1974, a CIA agent based in Asuncion, Paraguay, sends a coded message to Langley headquarters announcing the arrival of Klaus Barbie and Hans Rudel Ulrich, « ex-Luftwaffe, ex-Nazi and adviser to Juan Peron ». Rudel has an appointment with the Paraguayan dictator Stroesser. The report mentions Barbie's contacts with drug dealers in Santa Cruz. Following a television broadcast in 1967, Senator Javits called his government to account for the American protections afforded to Klaus Barbie. At the same time, the American army, which dreams of setting up an intelligence and action network in Latin America composed of ex-Nazis, considers reactivating Barbie. CIA documents, made public in 2001, indicate that the project was not pursued.

(…)

At the end of 1974, the Supreme Court of Bolivia refused France's extradition request. The protections did not prevent Barbie from returning to prison, in La Paz, from 2 March to 29 October 1973, but for tax offences. In 1975, he is said to be an « advisor on repression » to the Bolivian government. His name also appears in the sale of Austrian Kuirassier tanks to Bolivia. In Switzerland, he still buys small Pilatus Porter planes for the Bolivian government. On 2 February 1980, he signed a contract with the Bolivian army to provide services in the « intelligence speciality », should the need arise. He now travels with a Bolivian special services card and says stood ready to «participate directly in army operations ».

Klaus Barbie is in fact the head of a death squad nicknamed Los nobios della Muerte (The Bridegrooms of Death), a small army of neo-fascists who work for both the army and the drug lords. His right-hand man is an Italian neo-fascist wanted in his country for his participation in various massacres and attempted coups. In December 1982, a CIA agent reported their presence in Argentina with Colonel Luis Arce Gomez, head of military intelligence and head of the Bolivian death squads.

(…)

Delle Chiae's right-hand man is Pier Luigi Pagliai, who holds the title of « military attaché for the Argentinean armed forces in La Paz » and who he specialises in organising « interrogation seminars » for the Bolivian police.

On 12 September 1982, two « guinea pigs » - peasants - died in front of the « seminarians » during a course entitled « interrogation techniques, physical and psychological aspects of coercion : practical demonstration with lie detector ». Pagliai had stuck red-hot needles in their ears.

(…)

On 25 January 1983, the former head of the Lyon Gestapo was arrested and charged with financial fraud. In the shadows, the neo-fascists are stirring. CIA telegrams revealed that American agents were monitoring a group of Italians close to Pagliai who were planning to kidnap the French ambassador to Bolivia and the French presidential advisor Régis Debray. This double kidnapping did not take place. The story does not say whether the CIA took an active part in foiling the plot. On 5 February 1983, Barbie was deported to France to stand trial.

The American question is at the heart of the Barbie trial to be held in Lyon, as it is at the heart of the questions raised by historians who have examined the end of Jean Moulin.

In 1984, Pierre de Bénouville sent a secret message to the US Embassy in Paris for the attention of the US Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) and CIA Director William Casey. He says : Klaus Barbie's lawyer is preparing to make public in the next few days a letter from Klaus Barbie stating that he was employed by the OSS from 1943. In response to this accusation, which would never be made in this way, Bénouville asked the CIA director for documentation to set the record straight.

The Barbie question poisoned Franco-American relations during the 1980s. Faced with French accusations, the American administration reacted by ordering an internal investigation to assess the extent of the protection afforded to Jean Moulin's executioner. The Secretary of Justice asked Allan Ryan to launch an investigation. All the administrations concerned (CIA, FBI, State Department, US Army) are asked to open their archives. »

France United States, 50 years of dirty tricks - Fabrizio Calvi/Frédéric Laurent - Albin Michel - 2004

It should be noted that the U.S. security agencies, from 1947 - CIC, CIA, OPC, etc. - the Virginia corporation government entity of unknow judicial form, run by the City of London Corporation, itself run by the Mountbatten-Windsor brotherhood, have obstructed justice and allowed Nazi or pro-Nazi war criminals and criminals against humanity to escape justice in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 1505 :

« Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 770; Pub. L. 87–664, § 6(a), Sept. 19, 1962, 76 Stat. 551; Pub. L. 91–452, title IX, § 903, Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 947; Pub. L. 94–435, title I, § 105, Sept. 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 1389; Pub. L. 97–291, § 4(d), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1253; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 108–458, title VI, § 6703(a), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3766.)"

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1505

https://www.findlaw.com/criminal/criminal-charges/obstruction-of-justice.html

And in violation of Rome Statute of International Criminal Court :

Rome Statute of International Criminal Court - Article 70

Offences against the administration of justice

1. The Court shall have jurisdiction over the following offences against its administration of justice when committed intentionally:

(a) Giving false testimony when under an obligation pursuant to article 69, paragraph 1, to tell the truth;

(b) Presenting evidence that the party knows is false or forged;

(c) Corruptly influencing a witness, obstructing or interfering with the attendance or testimony of a witness, retaliating against a witness for giving testimony or destroying, tampering with or interfering with the collection of evidence;

(d) Impeding, intimidating or corruptly influencing an official of the Court for the purpose of forcing or persuading the official not to perform, or to perform improperly, his or her duties;

(e) Retaliating against an official of the Court on account of duties performed by that or another official;

(f) Soliciting or accepting a bribe as an official of the Court in connection with his or her official duties. »

https://www.icc-cpi.int/resource-library/documents/rs-eng.pdf

In 1983, in agreement with the President of the Republic, François Mitterrand, the French Minister of Defence, Charles Hernu, obstructed justice by put illegally on sequestering boxes of archives intended for the Barbie trial so that the elements they contained could not be used by Maître Verges, the defence lawyer, to bring out the truth, and to protect « personalities » involved in the collaboration. At least two ministers, André Giraud and Jean-Marie Bianco, and many state officials, were complicit in the crime.

Letter addressed from Charles Hernu to Jean-Louis Bianco :

« I took it upon myself, which is quite normal, not to transmit these 280 or so files to the magistrate in charge of the Barbie case. (…) What matters to me is not the truth, as I wrote to Mr. André Giraud, but the use that would have been made of it since these documents would have been given to Maître Verges. (…) »

More seriously ever, in 1984, Pierre Bénouville, aka Pierre de Bénouville, aka Guillain de Bénouville, aka..., who is not a civil servant of the French state, sends a secret letter to the US Embassy in Paris, to the attention of the Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) and Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), William Casey, informing him of what the Klaus Barbies lawyer, Jacques Verges, is about to reveal at the trial which would take place in 1987 : « Klaus Barbie's lawyer is preparing to make public in the next few days a letter from Klaus Barbie stating that he was employed by the OSS from 1943 ».

About Pierre Bénouville, aka…

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_de_Bénouville

A friend of François Mitterrand, Pierre Bénouville is a member of the terrorist organisation The Cagoule. He declared this himself in an interview given to the journalist Laure Adler.

« This is a normal political consequence. How is a man's life or dead decided? I killed a man in the metro during the occupation. You know, it's not difficult if you say to yourself : it's him or me. I have been involved in all sorts of stories where decisions had to be made. I've captured agents on occasion. Each time it was painful, I knew that the arrested man was going to cry, to tell me that he didn't want to die, to explain that he had children, to show me photos of his family. Each time, it was a horror. From the beginning of the war, I considered all those who had sided with the Germans as enemies. Nothing to do with political quarrels.

In the Cagoule, however, there were executions?

Yes, but with dangerous people. I don't know if I had been asked to decide, which I would have done, but I'm sure that Navachine was dangerous for national independence.

So you were not directly involved in the Navachine story, but in others?

Yes. »

Pierre Bénouville - Before the night comes, interviews with Laure Adler - Grasset 2002

Pierre Bénouville denies having been involved in the murder of Dimitri Navachine but admits to having been involved in other « stories » which could be crimes. The journalist says « executions ».

We recall that the Cagoule is a terrorist organisation that executed the minister Marx Dormoy who had refused to vote full powers to Philippe Pétain, the Rosseli brothers, opponents of the Italian fascist regime of Mussolini, Laetitia Tourreaux, the banker Dimitri Navachine.

Pierre Bénouville, a friend of François Mitterrand, says he is not involved in the crime of Dimitri Navachine, but two friends of François Mitterrand whom he can only know are accused of this crime : Jean Filliol and Jean-Marie Bouvier, aka Jean Bouvyer, aka… Jean Bouvier is also François Mitterrand's brother-in-law as he is the companion of his sister Marie-Josèphe Mitterrand. It is highly unlikely that a friend of François Mitterrand like Pierre Bénouville was unaware of the planning of Dimitri Navachine's crime. Indeed, he was a member of the Cagoule and until Mitterrand's death, he intervened, according to his own words, in the affairs of state as did another cagoulard before him, François Marie Méténier.

Concerning the crime of Dimitri Navachine, Pierre Bénouville declared to the journalist Laure Adler : « There is the execution of Navachine, a very dubious character by the way, an agent of the Soviet Union who made contact with the right, who is letting himself be trapped by him, letting himself be won. The proof is that it accepts contact with him. The hooded man who murdered Navachine prevented him from continuing his destructive action. I am not in favour of assassination, but Navachine was objectively dangerous. (…) There were brave men who took responsibility. So the assassination of Navachine seemed to us a blow full of light. He was indeed penetrating right-wing circles as an agent of Moscow. He was making provocations. He constituted a real danger for the Right because he came to propose it a completely different attitude. The right was, potentialy, sensitive to the idea of dealing with this kind of problem with Moscow agents. So it had to go. So it was better to do it yourself. So it was indeed an order given to Navachine's assassin to execute him? A political order? says Laure Adler. It is a normal political consequence. Answers Pierre Bénouville. » (Pierre Bénouville - Before the night comes, interviews with Laure Adler - Grasset 2002)

In 2002, Pierre Bénouville publicly declared that he supported the execution of opponents or agents, presumed agents since Navachine was not officially USSR agent, in the name of a « normal political consequence ». One can legitimately deduce that Pierre Bénouville, a member of the terrorist organisation The Cagoule, thought that the execution of the minister Marx Dormoy, who refused to vote for full powers for Philippe Pétain, was a « normal political consequence ».

It should be remembered that freedom of expression is a fundamental human right guaranteed by the French constitution, first amendment, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter, and that opposing political action is a right. When the Cagoule assassinated Minister Marx Dormoy, it committed a terrorist crime that nothing justifies.

It should be remembered that « agents », regardless of the country or countries they serve, do not make policy. They collect informations which they pass on to their superiors for their government. This governments must be sovereign and do not private entities of legal unknown form. Agents working for private entities of unknown legal form are mercenaries. We recall that under the Geneva Conventions, Article 47, a mercenary is not entitled to combatant or prisoner of war status.

Unfortunately, agents are too often entrusted with dirty jobs that are incompatible with democratic laws, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter. Whether Navachine was an agent or not, his execution is a Mafia crime, as would be the crime of any man or agent murdered in similar circumstances. When the Cagoule murdered Dimitri Navachine, it committed a terrorist and mafia crime that nothing justifies.

Pierre Bénouville presents Navachine as a danger to France because he negotiates with the French right, but this is what all international business leaders do. They negotiate with everybody. This is not a crime. This is not proof that be an « agent ». How could a negotiation by a Russian be more dangerous for the security of France than a negotiation by the US, the UK, Algeria or Senegal? The murderers of Navachine, Bouvyer and Filliol, are not national security specialists. They are only killers. The principals are anonymous. An anonymous principal is a terrorist or a mafia godfather.

Those responsible for state security make their decisions in consultation with their peers and the government members, give their orders publicly in writing and bear the consequences. In a democracy, they are accountable to the citizens who pay their salaries through taxes and are the guarantors of national sovereignty.

When the axioms Freedom Equality Fraternity are applied within a society, in the form Freedom ⇒ Equality ⇒ Fraternity, whatever that society, the democratic pact is fulfilled and popular sovereignty is fully expressed.

In 1789, the patriots had as their motto, « Liberty, Equality, Fraternity or Death » which means that a French citizen does not die for his country but for the morality that his country has instituted and defends, democracy (Demos = people and Cratie = power, i.e. « Power of the people, for the people, by the people » - Constitution of 4 October 1958 - Art. 2). This moral code is identical to that of the UN Charter. It is the founding principale of democracy. It is universal and prescriptive.

Those responsible for state security neutralise the enemies of the state in accordance with the law, including the right to life. A state security official only kills as a last resort or in self-defence. Any sentence must be the subject of a judicial decision taken after an adversarial debate who permit establish, with proofs, the guilt of the person being tried. In France, no citizen can take justice into his own hands because the rule of equality applies. Only a representative of law and order, in compliance with the laws in force, can neutralise (police officer) or condemn (judge) an enemy of the state or a delinquent.

Pierre Bénouville and François Mitterrand are friends of two of Dimitri Navachine's murderers, Jean Filliol and Jean-Marie Bouvier, aka Jean Bouvyer, both members of the Cagoule and collaborators, yet neither of them saw fit to do everything possible to ensure that these two criminals were brought to justice so that the truth could be established about Dimitri Navachine crime and with regard to the crimes they committed, as collaborators, during the Second World War.

Yet, François Mitterrand, as President of the France Republic, is the guarantor of the law and of the independence of justice.

The Cagoule, MI6, OSS, Z, SAIC, entities of unknown legal form

In view of the facts reported in this and the previous complaint, the Human Rights Association, WJJA, has demonstrated that the « security agencies » at the orders of City Of London Corporation- Virginia Corporation-Washington DC are entities of unknown legal form that employ mercenaries. Neither these « agencies » nor those they employ act on behalf of sovereign countries. It is therefore legitimate to wonder about the interests served by these entities of unknown legal form since they are not the interests of sovereign nations, respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter.

« The Army of the Republic is at the service of the Nation. Its mission is to prepare and ensure by force of arms the defense of the country and the superior interests of the Nation.

The military state requires in all circumstances a spirit of sacrifice, which can go as far as the supreme sacrifice, discipline, availability, loyalty and neutrality. The duties it entails and the constraints it implies deserve the respect of the citizens and the consideration of the Nation »

Defense Code - LIVRE Ier :GENERAL STATUS OF THE MILITARY (Articles L4111-1 à L4145-3) - Article L4111-1

https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/section_lc/LEGITEXT000006071307/LEGISCTA000006137720/

« Military personnel must obey the orders of their superiors and are responsible for the execution of the missions entrusted to them.

However, they may not be ordered to and may not perform acts that are contrary to the laws, customs of war and international conventions.

The responsibility of subordinates does not relieve their superiors of any of their responsibilities. »

Defense Code - LIVRE Ier : GENERAL STATUS OF THE MILITARY - Chapitre II : Obligations et responsabilités (Articles L4122-1 à L4122-10) - Article L4122-1

https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/section_lc/LEGITEXT000006071307/LEGISCTA000006137720/

« The orientations in the field of intelligence are decided by the National Intelligence Council, a specialized formation of the National Defense and Security Council. »

Defense Code - GENERAL PRINCIPLES (Articles L1111-1 to L1111-4)

Single chapter (Articles L1111-1 to L1111-4)

It should be remembered that any military or police officer in the service of a sovereign country, respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter, must have the nationality of the country he or she serves and have a clean criminal record

.

Is considered as an enemy agression of a sovereign country, respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter, any aggression, even subversive, which affects the life of the Nation, endangers the population, the integrity of the territory, the integrity and the action of its institutions. « The purpose of the national security strategy is to identify all the threats and risks likely to affect the life of the Nation, particularly with regard to the protection of the population, the integrity of the territory and the permanence of the institutions of the Republic, and to determine the responses that the public authorities must provide. » (Defense Code - GENERAL PRINCIPLES (Articles L1111-1 to L1111-4).

If we refer to the French Defense Code, the Macron Government is the enemy of the French Nation since it has violated its constitution, notably by signing the Treaty of Aachen which makes France and Germany entities of unknown legal form. (See Information circular for civil servants and citizens - ) It is a violation of the Constitution of France and therefore a crime of treason. Since the signing of the Treaty of Aachen, France and Germany are no longer sovereign countries. Neither Germany nor France, two sovereign countries that have become a legal entity of unknown form called the Franco-German Council of Ministers or the Franco-German Defense Council, have the right to sit on the UN or the UN Security Council. Only sovereign countries can do so under the Charter. (See WJJA Information Circular for Civil servants and citizens for legal explication)

If we refer to the French Defense Code, Pierre Bénouville, who works for OSS even though he is a French citizen, endangers the sovereignty of France, the integrity of its territory and its institutions. « Maintaining intelligence with a foreign power, with a foreign company or organization or one under foreign control, or with their agents, with a view to stirring up hostilities or acts of aggression against France, is punishable by thirty years' imprisonment and a fine of 450,000 euros . » (Penal Code - Book IV: Crimes and offenses against the nation, the State and public peace (Articles 410-1 to 450-5) - Article 411-4) / « Maintaining contacts with a foreign power, with a foreign or foreign-controlled enterprise or organization or with their agents, when it is likely to harm the fundamental interests of the nation, is punishable by ten years' imprisonment and a fine of 150,000 euros ». (Penal Code - Book IV: Crimes and offenses against the nation, the State and public peace (Articles 410-1 to 450-5) - Article 411-5)

If we refer to the French Defense Code, Philippe Pétain and all the members of the Cagoule, including Pierre Bénouville, committed a crime of treason by giving allegiance to the enemy while their country was legally at war.

« October 25. Laval had been at Matignon since the day before. Yesterday, upon his arrival, he gave instructions to the mercenaries of the French-speaking German press. His orders were well followed. Today, the newspapers which appear in Paris relate with lyricism the interview of Montoire and the happy consequences... which will result from it.

Today, Le Petit Parisien, Le Matin and L'Oeuvre stand out. Déat writes: "Four months, day to day after the armistice, the leaders of nations, yesterday enemies and legally still in a state of war, meet and greet each other without hatred... There is a greatness that everyone should feel in this meeting between the former combatant Hitler and the former combatant Pétain…

As a display of bravery, it's not bad. However, we must remember one admission of this frenetic literature: « NATIONS THAT ARE LEGALLY IN A STATE OF WAR. » Marcel Déat does not discuss the crime of treason. Better, he qualifies it.

The Nation will hold all these collaborators accountable. They know that they are guilty of the crime of intelligence with the enemy, which is provided for and punished by Article 75 (Today 411-5) of the Penal Code. The fate of arms will not always be favorable to Germany, and even if violence were to impose its law on us, there would be patriots in our country who would execute all the traitors who do the work of Nazis. »

The Treason Notebooks - From Montoire to 13 December by a witness - Librairie des Sciences et des Arts - 1945

If the enemy of a sovereign country can be clearly identified if one refers to the texts of laws, at least in France, the definition given by the cagoulard Pierre Bénouville makes it possible to transform into an enemy any person suspect of a crime against thought : « But on the other hand, little by little, there were elements that constituted the definition of the enemy in those years, in particular those who were the propagators of intellectual and social corruptions. » Was Minister Marx Dormoy assassinated because he had « propagated intellectual and moral corruption» by refusing to vote the full powers to Pétain and by refusing collaboration? Were the Rosselli brothers murdered because they had « propagated intellectual and moral corruption » by opposing Mussolini and his fascist regime? « Propagating intellectual and moral corruption » is not a crime defined by law and it cannot be because it does not designate a specific act. On the other hand, murder two men after ambushing them is a premeditated crime that falls under the Penal Code. The Cagoule gives itself the right to execute whoever it finds guilty of a crime based on rules that it defines itself in a given context. It is one of the principles of Nazi law not to follow the law : « Our judicial system must first and foremost preserve the community of the people. The irremovability of judges must be balanced by an elastic jurisprudence for the good of the community. The focus is not on the individual but on the German people. » (Adolf Hitler - 1937 - In The Law of Blood - Thinking and Acting like a Nazi - Johann Chapoutot - Gallimard 2014)

The Cagoule is a private entity of unknown legal form, of mafia and terrorist nature. According to the facts and testimonies, The Cagoule acte in correlation with MI6, Z and the OSS since its most influential members, Pierre Bénouville, in connection with Allen Dulles, in Switzerland, during the World War II, and Marie Madeleine Fourcade, in connection with Claude Dansey Marjorie Banks (MI6, Z, OSS), in Great Britain, worked in agreement with these agencies and doubtless others, in Italy, Spain and Germany.

« (…) MI6 will provide Alliance - code name of its network - with radio operators, transmitters, cipher books, weapons, various equipment, and credits. Alliance will deliver all the information gleaned in France or elsewhere. Loustaunau Lacaux (Member of the terrorist organization la Cagoule operating for Vichy, the Gestapo and the Abwehr) receives 5 million francs, an enormous sum. In return, he gives Kenneth the list of the main agents, listed under fancy symbols: he is N1 - Number One - isn't it. others KSI 42, COU 72, and his chief of staff is POZ55.

He is eager to prove to his English sponsors that his movement is capable of influencing the course of the war. Precisely, the commander Léon Faye (aka Eagle - https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Léon_Faye), his number two, delegated in Algeria, assures that he is able to raise the Army of Africa.

Loustaunau jumped on a boat and, on May 22, 1941, found Faye in Algiers. The two companions met with American "observers", a senior Belgian officer and numerous staff officers. A crossroads in the four corners of the city. Discretion is not the forte of the conspirators! Plenary meeting: around a table, covered with maps, directional plans, one aeropagus discuss the order of battle, tactics.

Through the doors, the windows, a commissioner and his team of cops appear. The brilliant officers did not think of posting watchmen who would sound the alarm in case of suspicious movement. Nice catch! Fortunately, between people of the same world... The conspirators are released on parole, with the exception of Faye and Loustaunau... whom the DST commissioner, Achiary, a sympathizer, lets go and who returns to France safely.

If Faye is imprisoned in Clermont-Ferrand, Loustaunau, in disguise, hides, not far from his home, in Pau from where he launches antennas everywhere. He even created a subversive radio station, Radio Terroir, which incited the resistance. »

The Secret Life of Sir Dansey - Bob Maloubier - Albin Michel - 2015 

How can a radio inciting the Resistance broadcast on French soil without being worried by the Gestapo or the Nazi troops? The underground resistance cannot afford this kind of stunt in the middle of enemy territory. Either Loustaunau Lacaux is an affabulator and Radio Terroir does not exist, or he is telling the truth and then he can only be under the protection of the Gestapo and the Abweihr. It is thus a tool at the service of the enemy which is used as bait to trap untrained resistants and functions, in fact, like Wikileaks who serve to trap for witnesses to hush up scandals before they happen. Without a witness, it is difficult to prove a crime.

It should be remembered that Wikileaks is a tool implemented by Andy Mulher Magunh via the Chaos Computer Club, an annex of the BND, the BND being only the last denomination of the Gehlen Network composed of Nazi criminals led by the Parakratos City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC on the German territory placed under their tutelage after World War II. (See, above, the 15 WJJA demands for the release of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange and the WJJA complaint 1).

In view of the facts, it is legitimate to consider the Alliance Network as acting in collusion with or under the orders of the Parakratos City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC, the Nazi regime and the Vichy collaborationist regime.

In view of the facts, the Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to determine whether, during World War II, the Alliance network was working in collusion with the Parakratos City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC, the Nazi regime, the Abwehr, Z or any other entity of a subversive or terrorist nature of unknown legal form.`

« Like, in France, the Petainist Pierre Guillain de Bénouville, of the founding nucleus of the Cagoule (Les Camelots du Roi of the 17th section of the 16th arrondissement), associated with his crimes: Bénouville, who late became a « Resistance fighter », by joining the OSS would mobilise his dear friend Guy Fradin, chairman of the board of the Sarguemines foundry company, a member of the BCRA, closely linked to the Cagoule, who had become chief of staff to the Minister of Justice François de Menthon, from the autumn of 1944 onwards, in order to avoid the purge of the worst collaborationists.

Or Georges Loustaunau-Lacau, former aide-de-camp to Pétain and leader of the Cagoule militaire, a notorious Germanophile who, at the end of 1940, like his companion and political guardian Marie Madeleine Fourcade (married to Méric), went over to the British side under the name « Navarre ». Always busy with the destruction of communism, he remained a member of the Marshal's special services until early 1941.

Then this anti-Gaullist (like Bénouville), who passed on « interesting information » to Passy-Dewavrin, directed an intelligence network, undermined, from the outset, by devastating betrayals, the crucible of the Alliance Network founded in October 1941. A long report by the Military Security in 1944 painted a damning picture: the French special services claimed to have proof that Loustaunau-Lacau was working for the Germans. The army staff suspected him of being a double agent working for the Germans.

Various elements of the Loustaunau-Lacau-Fourcade file establish that the couple worked for Germany throughout the war. »

The French elites between 1940 and 1944 - Annie Lacroix Riz - Armand Colin -2016

If Marie Madeleine Fourcade works for Nazi Germany then Claude Dansey, MI6, Z, the Cagoule also work for Nazi Germany. As a result, the Parakratos City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC also work with Nazi Germany. As a result, the Parakratos City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC also works in collaboration with the Parakratos Pétain-Laval-Vichy and with Nazi Germany.

In view of the facts, it is clear that three occult Parakratos, now identified, collaborated with the Nazi government of Adolf Hitler. In the same way of the Nazis, the Waffen SS, the Gestapo, etc., the members of these occult Parakratos are guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity. The members of these occult governments are guilty of intelligence with the enemy and treason.

In view of the facts, it is clear that Charles Hernu, Pierre Bénouville, François Mitterrand and the other members of these occult Parakratos obstructed justice in order not to have to answer for their crimes.

Mass crimes and crimes against humanity are not subject to the statute of limitations and do not be. Even after the death of the perpetrators, justice must be done to the victims and their descendants. Whether they are dead or still alive, the members of these occult Parakratos must be identified, tried in media trials and convicted so that justice can be served to those they have illegally confined, tortured, sent to camps and executed.

In view of the facts, the Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to identify all members of the Alliance network and to determine whether any of them were involved in deportations, denonciations, mass crimes, crimes against humanity or blood crimes and to determine whether there was intelligence with a foreign or enemy power, thus treason.

« Alliance spreads like a hydra whose heads snoop from the free zone to Alsace, the Belgian border, the English Channel, the Atlantic and Paris. Alliance generates a stream of information that is communicated to Dansey through the airwaves or by William Sleator, its representative in Madrid. « Uncle Claude » didn't expect so much. « Uncle Claude » didn't expect so much. He satisfies on the hour the least order coming from Loutaunau who spends without counting the cost by taking insane risks. Relatives warn him :

The DST has spotted you! Leave Pau, incognito, this very night. Tomorrow, it will be too late. »

The Secret Life of Sir Dansey - Bob Maloubier - Albin Michel - 2015

The DST (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direction_de_la_Surveillance_du_territoire) ensures the security of the French territory. Some of its members joined the Resistance. It is legitimate to consider that the DST identified Alliance as an entity acting in « intelligence with a foreign power hostile to the interests of France ».

Consequently, the association for the defense of human rights, WJJA, asks the French intelligence bodies to kindly place on file all the archives in their possession concerning the Alliance network, its members and its actions. 

As France is from since the signature of the treaty of Aix la Chapelle, in the hands of an terrorist entity of unknown legal form, named Franco-Germano Defence and Security Council, and that they were, previously, because Pierre Bénouville, member of the terrorist Organization La Cagoule, obeying the orders of Allen Dulles, thus to the Parakratos City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC, gave his guidelines to presidents of republic, we ask the security services of the French territory to place these archives in open source in order to make them accessible to investigators, historians and journalists of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter as well as to any citizen wishing to examine them. The false Assange procedure carried out by the Parakratos City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC, in which the Franco-German Defense Council is also involved, is only one of many staged events, allowing the destruction of the judicial system or, as in the case of the Barbie procedure, allowing the rescue of criminals.

A president of the French Republic, Francois Mitterrand, a minister of defense, therefore in charge of national security, respect for the constitution and laws, Charles Hernu, obstructed justice in the context of a procedure against a notorious war criminal and criminal against humanity, Klaus Barbie. In this system, the servants of the state in charge of enforcing the law are subjected to blackmail and threats, thus to terrorist pressure. Making state archives and documents open source can only protect them from being neutralized by terrorists. Secrecy is the soil on which all forms of crime grow. Only secrecy allows the summary execution that Pierre Bénouville claims for political opponents, prosecution witnesses or those they call « agents ».

If the « Cabinet Noir » (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabinet_noir), set up by Richelieu, was entitled to preserve the King's secrecy since the French were his subjects and he got his power from God, this rule cannot be applied in a democratic society respecting the rule of equality and the sovereignty of the people. Since it is the people who are sovereign and who govern, they must be informed, in all transparency, of the affairs of state, otherwise they can't accomplish their mission.

« We must certainly agree that, however bad a prince may be, the revolt of his subjects is always infinitely criminal. He who gave kings to men wanted them to be respected as his lieutenants, reserving to himself alone the right to examine their conduct. His will is that whoever is born a subject should obey indiscriminately; and this law, so express and so universal, is not made in favor of princes alone, but is salutary to the very peoples on whom it is imposed, and who can never violate it without exposing themselves to evils much more terrible than those they claim to guarantee themselves. »

Memoirs of Louis XIV, The job of a king, presented and annotated by Jean Longnon,Paris, Tallandier, collection « Relire l’histoire », 2001, « Mémoires pour l’année 1667 », p. 255-256 (http://ressources.chateauversailles.fr/IMG/pdf/les_sujets_doivent_obeissance_a_leur_roi.pdf)

A subject is not a free citizen. He is considered as infantile and submitted to an authority to which he must obey without ever discussing it. In Royalty, power is omnipotent and hierarchical, which is not the case in a democracy since the rule of equality applies. In a democracy, power is collegial and subject to contradictory debate. The servants of the state are accountable to the sovereign people, not to a president of the Republic or a government, who are only their representatives, just also as the police, the army and the judiciary are their representatives. If the sovereignty of the people is respected, the independence of justice is also respected. If transparency is required for the state and its servants, blackmail, threats and hostage taking are no longer possible.

The investigation into the Assange affair has highlighted the fragility of the state bodies in charge of territorial security, the police and the army, and the corruption that reigns within the justice system.

All citizens who oppose these subversive or (and) terrorist entities of unknow legal form are subjected to blackmail, pressure, threats or summarily executed like René Lucet, Pierre Bérégovoy, François de Grossouvre, Robert Boulin, etc…

Consequently, how French institutions are in the hands of terrorists who violate the integrity of French territory, it is up to the agents of the French secret services, custodians of information relating to the security of the state, to hand them over to their sovereign supervisory authority, the people, in respect of its power, defined in Article 2 of the Constitution of October 4, 1958: « Its principle is: government of the people, by the people and for the people ».

In a democratic state, it is the people who govern. It is therefore entitled to access the documents, including sensitive ones, of the country for which it is responsible and it has the duty to ensure that the constitution and the laws are respected. It is up to the people to ensure that the servants of the state can carry out their missions in complete safety, in accordance with the laws in force. The informants with whom we have been in contact manifest themselves, most often anonymously, because they fear for their lives, their physical integrity, those of their families, their children.

As for some of the information we have obtained concerning what can be called the « Wikileaks - Assange Network », it leads us to fear summary executions, torture in Dark Places, house arrest or secret confinement in psychiatric hospitals : « They were 40 to 140 at the beginning, from WikiLeaks. They will have been sequestered here, on the floors, tortured as much as the foreign services are replacing the French political police of Macron's government and the French army. »

In light of the above facts the Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to identify the agents of the Wikileaks Assange Network, to determine their name and place of birth, to determine for which private entity of unknown legal form they work, to determine how many of them may have been held incommunicado in Dark Places, tortured or executed, to determine which of them have infiltrated the French police force and army.

In light of the above facts the Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to identify the citizens, opponents of the system or not, that the Wikileaks - Assange Network has entrapped, neutralised, incarcerated in secret, tortured or executed.

In light of the above facts the Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to to identify the « bosses » of the Wikileaks-Assange network of unknown legal form, to determine their birth names, their places of birth and all their aliases, to determine in which country they are based or infiltrated.

« Loustaunau replies : Tomorrow, I will go into total underground. Before that, I must, at all costs, say goodbye to my wife and daughter. We have an appointment in the early morning at the church. (…) Twelve hours later, thirteen bloodhounds disguised as hillbillies, whom neither his wife, nor his daughter, nor he, sniffe out, pounced on the great Alliance leader. The number one joined his number two in the Clermont Ferrand prison. Alliance is doubly decapitated.

Dismayed, Dansey writes it off. A message from France gives him hope.

Network affected but everything continues.

Who takes over?

The « Chief of Staff », symbol POZ 55 answers: « Me, surrounded by faithful lieutenants ».

MI6 parachutes in POZ 55 a first radio "made in England, She, an Englishman having lived in France.

(…)

« Alliance » swing between success and failure. Formed, in the military, of second-hand agents, the network is a centralized, pyramidal concept.The chief commands regional « General staffs », sitting in offices whose walls are lined with plans, maps with small flags, the mail, even transmitters, sits on tables. The information is collated at the top. Liaison officers transmit written orders, sometimes in clear text. People meet and even share farewell meals. Amateur spies, they ignore the rules of compartmentalization taught by the SOE security schools. Also, in spite of the complicities maintained within the ministries, the army, the police, the gendarmerie, and the Vichy secret services, indiscretions and betrayals led to a chain of disintegrations.

Dansey, who is obsessed with secrecy, knows about it, but he refrains from sticking his nose in from the outset. Kenneth Cohen has subscribed to Loustaunau's orders: the network will have total control over its operations.

However, there is no reason why should not take an overview with its new boss, POZ 55, who has made himself king without knowing anything about his abilities or his pedigree. Dansey sets up a meeting in Lisbon with one of Cohen's assistant, Richards.

On the day in question, the latter, expecting to meet a moustachioed officer, cannot believe his eyes when a young woman appears and stares at him with azure blue eyes. She is slim, small, pretty but ... crumpled, because she crossed Spain rolled into a ball in a large sealed bag, the diplomatic bag of Vichy. From Madrid, a British Embassy car took her to the Tagus, the border river between Portugal and Spain.

(…)

One day, Commander Faye reappears. (...) Condemned by Vichy, he is certainly a headliner at the Gestapo headquarters on rue des Saussaies and at the Lutetia hotel where the Abwehr reigns. How did he slip through their fingers? Wouldn't they have left him free to move around and put a tail on him?

Although a male, senior officer and Navarre's second-in-command, Faye spontaneously placed himself under the orders of this frail young woman

. MI6 has parachuted in several transmitters. The movement regains its voice.

(…)

Captured, released several times; leader of a network decimated but constantly rising from its ashes, burned from all angles, POZ 55 survives only by miracle. Dansey, an old hand at subversion, is aware of this. In the spring of 1943, he asked her to go green to London.

In the morning, a monumental crown of roses is delivered to her. As she inhales its fragrance, an elegant gentleman, wearing an orchid in his lapel, bows to her, grabs both her hands and exclaims: « Ah, here is the terrible woman who has made us tremble so much! How good it is to see you here safe! I have often wondered what you looked like... I am not disappointed ».

At once, she fell under the spell of this « extraordinarily seductive gentleman with the look of a well-trained clubman, his skin and hands well groomed, his racy eyes, his elastic golfing stride ». She also said: « I knew little about him, except that he was one of those who hold the world in his hands »

He goes out of his way to offer her a flat in St James Court, he gives her a bundle of pounds and a guide to go museums and shops. Sir Claude's staff consulted her on the situation in France and the activities of his network, gave her messages from his own people and passed on her replies.

Soon she is doing something other than resting. The Machiavellian « Uncle Claude » has bring her where he wants her : she runs the Alliance from England and, without him appearing, under his tutelage.

He caresses her in the direction of the hair : sprays of roses and fine dinners at Brown's, a luxury hotel whose table would give points to Manette's. There, between a venerable claret and a stilton of port, he tries to make the woman he calls his « niece » see reason (…)

(…)

Faye is totally burnt. He must not set foot in France again either. You have an excellent network leader there, Paul Bernard. It's up to him to take over. I've undertaken not to give you any orders, « my dear », but if either you or Faye are determined to enter France, well, you won't find any Lysanders fit for the air! You have, both, exceed rating of alertness.

(…)

On the evening of 15 September, Faye clutched Mary Magdalene to his heart and went to Tangmere. On September 1st, 17th and 18th, the Alliance transmitters remain silent. (...) 

Finally, an emissary of Sir Claude gives him a message: « The passengers of the Lysander have been arrested in the Paris express. The PCs in the Capital were « visited », sixteen agents were captured, seven transmitters and bundles of documents seized. Shortly afterwards, a wave of arrests swept through Vichy, Lyon, Autun, Marmande and Brest; the Gestapo seized quintals of archives and captured 150 agents. Two of them were shot.

Mary Magdalene is appalled. Fortunately « Uncle Claude » comforts her, stands by her side constantly and distracts her as best he can. They sometimes dine at Alexandre Korda's, who swears to devote a thread to the Alliance Network after the war.

Suddenly, the Network was reborn from its ashes: the sectors of Bordeaux, Tour, Nantes, manifested themselves. Marie Madeleine and Dansey learn that Faye is in the hands of Kieffer, the SS captain who commands the Gestapo interrogation centre at 84 Avenue Foch. He has tried to escape in the company of Noor Inayat Khan and Bob Starr, agents of the British Special Operation Executive. He sawed through the bars of his cell, climbed to the roof. His accomplices were delayed. An air raid alerted him. Starr panicked, roused the sentries. Since then, there's been no word.

In January 1944, Kenneth Cohen often joined « Uncle Claude » when the latter distracted Marie Madeleine Fourcade. On the French side, Paul Bernard, the head of the Alliance, agreed: « It is time to decentralise. I will reduce the staff to one head. We will no longer accumulate archives. No more gatherings »!

Wishful thinking. Years of inertia cannot be reversed in a day. In London, « Uncle Claude » says to his « niece » : « In the past you played the wrong horse, my dear. Your Giraud lost the race. De Gaulle swept him away. It is better that you make friends with Passy, the boss of the Gaullist BCRA who collaborates closely with me. He is intelligent. I like him a lot. Do you know that I, for my part, arm the communists? The idea came from Churchill, who thought they were better organised and more united than many others."

On this occasion, he organises a "cohesion" lunch which brings together the young woman, Kenneth Cohen, Passy, his assistant Manuel, Maurice Shumman and Rémy.

(…)

In mid-March 1944, Alliance suffered a new massacre, as a result of the decentralisation implemented by Paul Bernard. The latter was arrested.

(…)

How I blame myself for having made this proposal to you, dear! However, I must respect it... you don't smoke anymore. God, it costs me to throw you into the lion's den so close to the end.

« But swear to me, if you are ever arrested, that you will shout to the Gestapo that it was I who sent you to give me reports on the Communists. Tell them that we are preparing an offensive against the Soviets! As this is a new thing, they won't dare touch you. If necessary, I will confirm it, live, in my own way, trust me. » »

The Secret Life of Sir Dansey - Bob Maloubier - Albin Michel - 2015

The testimony of SOE and later SDCE agent and creator of the first combat swimmer units, Robert Maloubier, aka Bob Maloubier (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Maloubier), leaves no doubt about the subordination of the Alliance network to MI6, Z and Vichy government. Marie Madeleine Fourcade works under the orders of Sir Dansey, creator of OSS, friend of Allen Dulles, second-in-command of MI6, creator of the subversive and terrorist organisation Z in Bern, the armed wing of the Parakratos City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC. and therefore of the Mountbatten-Windsor Brotherhood.

At this stage of the investigations, it appears that the Cagoule, Clan Mitterrand, Z, MI6, OSS, Abwerh, Gestapo, are working in collusion for the Parakratos City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC. and therefore for the Mountbatten-Windsor Brotherhood.

Marie Madeleine Fourcade travels from France to Madrid in a Vichy diplomatic bag. She therefore belonged to the staff of agents working for Marshal Pétain, the Abweihr, the Gestapo, the Nazis and therefore for the occupier and the enemy of France. No genuine resistance fighter could have travelled in this way. It was an English car that took her to Madrid, proof that there were links between Vichy and the English and therefore intelligence with the enemy.

Claude Dansey makes it clear that he is in contact with the enemy, that he communicates with him and that he exercises his authority over him : « But swear to me, if you are ever arrested, that you will shout to the Gestapo that it was I who sent you to give me reports on the Communists. Tell them that we are preparing an offensive against the Soviets! As this is a new thing, they won't dare touch you. If necessary, I will confirm it, live, in my own way, trust me. »

Sir Dansey offers a flat to Marie Madeleine Fourcade. Her services are therefore paid for. She has well the status of a mercenary. She runs the Alliance network from London under the orders of Sir Dansey, thus MI6, Z and the OSS.

Bob Maloubier also testifies to the subordination of Passy, head of the BCRA, Shumman, Kenneth Cohen and Rémy to Sir Dansey and therefore to the Parakratos City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC. and therefore of the Mountbatten-Windsor Brotherhood. There is intelligence with the enemy and therefore treason, treason of the French people and of the authentic Resistance fighters, treason with regard to the agreements made between the sovereign allied countries, treason which caused millions of deaths, including 20 million Soviets who waited, in vain, for the British and Americans to open a front in the West to relieve them.

At this stage of the investigations, it appears that the Alliance and Combat Networks are mercenary entities set up to sabotage the work of genuine resistance fighters, to trap and neutralise them. All these networks operate on the same principle as the Wikileaks - Assange network. The aim is to identify, approach and then neutralise, those Pierre Bénouville calls « agents », term who may be opponents such as Marx Dormoy or state officials wishing to enforce the law, denounce crimes or misappropriations, such as René Lucet or Captain Paul Barril. Networks like Combat and Alliance are invisible battalions that infiltrate structures to take control in the manner of manipulative parasites. The infiltrators remove from the structure any individual deemed harmful and condition the others to comply with their directives.

Manipulative parasites

https://www.pourlascience.fr/sd/ethologie/les-parasites-manipulateurs-2057.php

https://www.sciencepresse.qc.ca/actualite/2014/01/13/etes-controle-parasite

https://www.cerveauetpsycho.fr/sd/comportement/le-parasite-qui-nous-manipule-9476.php

https://trustmyscience.com/parasites-controlant-esprit-fourmis-insectes/

Despite having acted in intelligence with the enemy, and for some, despite being a member of a subversive or terrorist organisation, Pierre Bénouville, François Mitterrand, Hubert Védrine, Maurice Schumman, Marie Madeleine Fourcade, etc exercised state functions when they were not entitled to do so and obstructed justice by preventing war criminals and criminals against humanity such as Klaus Barbie from being tried.

Since the Pétain-Laval coup d'état, France has been governed by a Parakratos subordinate to the Mitterrand clan and system and of which Pierre Bénouville seems to be one of the leaders. Like the Parakratos City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC. and thus for the Mountbatten-Windsor brotherhood, this Parakratos Mitterrand-Cagoule is mafia-like, Nazi in nature and practices terrorism.

To escape their crime, they sit up a parody of justice with the complicity of corrupt magistrates, in the manner of the Nazis, thereby destroying, at the same time, the rule of law and the republican principles of Liberty, Equality and Fraternity. 

The Assange case is the archetype of this parody of justice, stringing together illegal and false procedures, staging fake hearings in stage set. The last Assange hearing took place in a museum.

.

« From June 1947 onwards, the Majestic archives provided a great deal of interesting information on Déat that the Place Vendôme did not transmit to the High Court until September-October: a simple example of the general veto against the reopening of classified files, weighed down by new German sources that will not be examined.

The Franco-Italian comedy of Déat's extradition began, triggered by the interview article in the Milano Serra of 20 October 1947, entitled: «The war criminal condemned to death lives quietly in the Alto Adige ». Déat had shown his four passports (...) perfectly in order (...) Italian, Austrian, Swiss and Argentinian and flattered himself that he was not wanted by « all the police » but only by the « French police » (We know how).

In his provocative interview, he congratulated himself on the fact that the « United States was determined to destroy communism » and that Italy « where the people were attracted to Russia » owed it to its benefactors not to be « at this time in the hands of the communists». He announced that on his, imminent, return he would hang the reds from the lampposts because a good bloodbath would purify France and that the reconstituted Fascist International would do the same everywhere. More discreet about his supreme protections, he attributed his salvation to Italian and foreign friends, refused to explain how he had escaped research (« this is my business »), and said nothing about the American Curia.

There followed a ballet started by the French Ambassador to Italy, who spoke of the possible importance attached by the French Government to the handing over of

Marcel Déat and incriminated the unfortunate tendency in Rome to pass easily over the facts of collaboration with the enemy. The operation proceeded in the same way as the Franco-Italian exchanges concerning the Italian fascist dignitary Afunso, officially not a « war criminal » either.

The Quai d'Orsay therefore blamed only the « Palais Chigi », which invoked its « right of asylum », for the refusal of Marcel Déat's «rapid delivery ». But France had still not requested it in January 1948, date on wich a new article on a recent interview with Déat in Rome revived the endless scandal. The soap opera (diplomatic and domestic) interrupting here, in BB18 until October 1949, so I do not know whether Schumman had to pretend to deal with it.

Only press publicity had led to fucal outbursts, as when Renaud de Jouvenel's book « L'internationale des traitres » (The Traitors' International) which provoked complaints in the summer of 1949 from the French Bronzais, whom he accused of having been, like Déat, protected by the United States.

« The freedom Déat enjoyed in Northern Italy and in the American zone of Austria could be taken away from him overnight if those who covered up for him and aimed at his four false passports (assuming they did not make them) had the slightest desire to do so, » said the author. « If they allow one of the French leaders of the pro-Nazi collaboration to roam the territory they control, it is because they have given him discreet but obvious protection like other European protégés useful to their plans for the future of Europe. »

The Non-Purification of France - Annie Lacroix Riz - Armand Colin - 2019

These entities of unknown legal form do not represent any sovereign country that respects the UN Charter and the Declaration of Human Rights. As former CIA Director Mike Pompeo so aptly put it, « They lie, they cheat, they steal » and he might have added, they kill. They act in the manner of terrorists and mafia organisations, to destabilise the sovereign countries in which they operate. They work for the City Of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation-Washington DC, so for the Mountbatten-Windsor Brotherhood. They are involved in many crimes for which most of them have not been prosecuted or convicted. However, since none of the employees of these agencies work for governments of sovereign countries, respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter. They are mercenaries who fall under Article 47 of the Geneva Conventions and the Penal Code.

Extract from the deposition of Fernand Ladislas Jakubiez (Cagoule’s Matricule 526 - assignment 2e R) questioned on June 6, 1945 during the trial of Marshal Pétain for his involvement in the Rosselli brothers' crime.

« I owe you the truth because I want to free my conscience.

I have belonged to the Action Française since 1928 when I was working as a draftsman at Maison Sins in Paris, 5 Bd Montmartre.

At the end of December 1935, the entire Action Française team led by Jean Filliol resigned because of political differences with the movement's leadership.

Shortly afterwards, Jean Filliol founded a National Revolutionary Party movement, whose leadership was entrusted to Eugène Deloncle. Some time later, in 1936, this party was transformed into the CSAR."

The great investigations of Commissioner Chenevier (From the Cagoule to the Dominici affair) - Jean Emile Néomet - Albin Michel - 1995

Here appears a first contradiction concerning the creation of the CSAR. It is common knowledge that the CSAR, aka The Cagoule, was created by Eugène Deloncle, not by Jean Filliol. Fernand Jakubiez, a member of The Cagoule, declares in court during the trial of Marshal Pétain that the creator of CSAR, aka The Cagoule, is Jean Filliol, but no French judicial or administrative authority takes steps to establish the truth.

As one witness stated publicly and anonymously in 1945, The Cagoule was omnipotent in Vichy and that the leader was François Méténier : «The French general staff is agitated. It camouflages weapons and equipment in the farms of the southern zone, with a view to a possible coup d'état. The Méténier team - the leader of the Cagoulards - is omnipotent in Vichy. Encouraged by Peyrouton and his acolytes, they were preparing the coup d'état which would consolidate the totalitarianism of the French state, eliminate Laval and with him all the survivors of the old regime. What matters above all to these gentlemen is to have all the power and all the places under the protection of the Marshal. Through the intermediary of Doriot, these people obviously have contacts with the German General Staff, which is already beginning its underhand struggle against Abetz and the Embassy. Skilful politicians, with the country's interest in mind at all times, could perhaps play on these rivalries. Those we see have only one thought : to bet on the winner, to side with one side or the other. In both hypotheses, it is France that pays, it is the German who enslaves our homeland. » (The Treason Notebooks - From Montoire to 13 December by a witness - Librairie des Sciences et des Arts - 1945)

At this stage of the investigation, at least six French citizens are identified as leaders of the Cagoule : Eugène Deloncle, after his dead, Jacques Corrèze, aka « La Bûche », who, in 1941, joined the French Volunteer Legion (LVF) to fight alongside the Nazis against the Soviet Union (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_Corrèze), François Méténier (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/François_Méténier), in charge of the order service of Marshal Pétain in 1940, Jean Filliol (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Filiol), Pierre Bénouville (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_de_Bénouville) and Henri Martin (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henri_Martin_(activiste)). All are friends or relatives by marriage of François Mitterrand aka Tonton. Two were involved in the management of the state and had access to the Elysée Palace : François Méténier and Pierre Bénouville. Pierre Bénouville works too for Marcel Dassault, whose company produces warplanes and is involved in security and defence.

Allegedly the head of an private terrorist entity of unknown legal form, called La Cagoule, of which he is a proven member, Pierre Bénouville has been acting, since the Second World War, in the shadow of power, on two fundamental axes of its sovereignty, the legislative, the executive and the judiciary, dictating their policy to the different presidents and of controlling the workings of its defence and security through the Dassault Holding Company.

In view of the facts, Pierre Bénouville held the position of President occult of France since World War II until his death.

Is it then in his capacity as hidden president of France that he obstructs justice and prevents the truth from being told about the death of Jean Moulin and the war crimes and crimes against humanity of Nazi Klaus Barbie?

Pierre Bénouville warns CIA Director William Casey that Jacques Verges, Barbie's lawyer, is about to reveal that his client has been a member of the OSS since 1943, i.e. almost from its inception since the OSS was created in June 1942.

If Klaus Barbie is an OSS agent since 1943, many questions arise.

How could Pierre Bénouville know in 1984 that Klaus Barbie had been working for the OSS since 1943 when, according to declassified archive documents, he had been working for the CIC (created in 1941) and the OPC (operational from 1948 to 1950), in the US-occupied zone in Germany?

If Barbie has been working for the OSS since 1943, it means that he has tortured, committed war crimes and crimes against humanity in agreement with the OSS. The OSS is therefore complicit in the crimes committed by the Gestapo on French territory and therefore probably complicit in the assassination of Jean Moulin.

It should be remembered that in 1944, Klaus Barbie appeared on the list of war criminals published by the UNWCC (United Nations War Crimes Commission - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_War_Crimes_Commission). He is listed under n° 48 in the German section under the name of Barbier, aka Kreitz, member of the Gestapo of Lyon and Dijon. He is also on the first (1945) CROWCASS (Central Register of War Criminals and Security Suspects - https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/CROWCASS) list published by SHAEF (Supreme Headquarters Allied Expeditionary Force - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Headquarters_Allied_Expeditionary_Force). He is listed as No. 57 and the names Barbie, aka Barbier, aka Von Barbier, wanted for murder. In 1944, the US and the Allies knew that Barbie was a war criminal and a murderer wanted for trial.

Moreover, if Klaus Barbie works for the OSS since 1943, he works for Allen Dulles who heads the OSS in Switzerland, in Bern. The OSS was created and is headed by MI6's second-in-command, Claude Dansey Marjorie Banks, aka Uncle Claude, aka Uncle Dansey, aka…, who is also the boss and creator of the private agency of unknown legal form, Z, whose operation is similar in many ways to that of the Cagoule.

In its previous complaint, the Human Rights Association, WJJA, demonstrated that the Parakratos of « Virginia Corporation - Washinton DC » was ruled by the Mountbatten-Windsor brotherhood through the City of London Corporation and the Navigation Act of 1660. The President of the United States manages the American government as a governor of the City of London Corporation headed by the Mountbatten-Windsor brotherhood. The President of the United States is therefore implementing the directives of the Mountbatten-Windsor Brotherhood via the City of London Corporation.

In fact, MI6, the OSS, the CIA, and all British and American government agencies, are under the orders of the Mountbatten-Windsor Brotherhood. Their agents do not work for a sovereign country but for an entity of unknown legal form called « City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washinton DC ». They are all therefore mercenaries. They all fall under Article 47 of the Geneva Conventions.

So, if Barbie works for the OSS, he is a mercenary who works for Germany, England and the USA, i.e. for the Parakratos « City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washinton DC », thus for the Mountbatten-Windsor brotherhood.

Pierre Bénouville also works for the OSS. It is therefore also legitimate to think that this is why he can say that Klaus Barbie also worked for the OSS since 1943. It is therefore also legitimate to think that Klaus Barbie and Pierre Bénouville knew each other. It is legitimate to consider that Klaus Barbie and Pierre Bénouville worked together for OSS, especially as they were both involved in the Caluire Affair and the assassination of Jean Moulin.

« In Switzerland, Bénouville and Davet continued their contacts with the OSS. On May 8, a meeting took place at the home of Colonel Groussard. This Cagoulard who, in Vichy, had hunted down the Gaullists, broke with Pétain and joined the Resistance. He works in Switzerland for a British network. Alongside the men from Combat, representatives of Giraud, the second Vichy office and the OSS took part in the meeting. The contacts between the representatives of Combat and the OSS continued throughout May. »

France United States, 50 years of twists and turns - Fabrzio Calvi - Frédéric Laurent - Albin Michel - 2004

As an OSS agent since 1943, did Klaus Barbie participate in these meetings that would seal Moulin's fate? Who decided Jean Moulin's death? Pierre Bénouville? Allen Dulles? Klaus Barbie? Colonel Groussard? Claude Marjory Banks? The Mountbbatten-Windsors?

At this stage of the investigation, in view of the facts, it is legitimate to think that Pierre Bénouville, Henri Frenay, part of the staff of Combat, as well as Nazi criminals like Klaus Barbie, all work for the entity of unknown legal form Montbatten-Windsor, thus for the Anglo-American Parakratos, « City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC », and receive their directives from the command post of this government, composed of MI6, OSS, Z and the Cagoule, based in Switzerland, in Bern in particular.

At this stage of the investigation, in view of the facts, it is legitimate to think that a Parakratos under the orders of the Mountbatten-Windsor brotherhood is trying to take control of the countries of Europe in collaboration with the Nazi regime. The nature of this collaboration is clearly defined by the pro-Nazi journalist Fernand Brinon, aka Fernand de Brinon, (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fernand_de_Brinon) delegate general of the French government in the occupied territories and friend of Otto Abetz : « For us French, collaboration is, above all, an understanding of the situation. The victorious Germany has the duty and the means to proceed with the formation of the New Europe. In order to unify our continent under its leadership, the Reich can count on the active help of France. » (The Treason Notebooks - From Montoire to 13 December by a witness - Librairie des Sciences et des Arts - 1945)

International complaint to defend democracy and immediate Release Request for the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange

http://monika-karbowska-liberte-pour-julian-assange.ovh/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Plainte-Wikijustice-pour-Julian-Assange.pdf 

<http://monika-karbowska-liberte-pour-julian-assange.ovh/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Plainte-Wikijustice-pour-Julian-Assange.pdf>

Identification of an agent

No citizen is in a position to say that another citizen is an « agent », unless he or she is an agent. And when an agent is identified by a country, he or she is presumably returned to his or her country or used as a bargaining chip for an agent held in his or her country of origin. Staff working for a sovereign country are assimilated to military personnel and fall under the Geneva Conventions. Summary executions are the hallmark of dictatorships and mafia.

As the agents work under false identities, only their government supervisory authorities or peers can identify them. If Pierre Bénouville formally identifies agents, he can only be an agent himself.

At this stage of the investigation, the Human Rights Defence Association, WJJA, is able to identify two categories of agents :

• Official agents working for sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and UN Charter with military statute and relating to the Geneva Conventions. They act illegally on the territory of a sovereign foreign power but under the protection of their sovereign state. Any arrest of an official is normally the subject of diplomatic negotiations between the two countries concerned.

• Mercenary agents working for private entities of unknown legal form, under the Penal Code. It falls under Article 47 of the Geneva Conventions. All their actions are illegal regardless of the territory they are in.

As Pierre Bénouville works for the OSS and therefore for the entity of unknown legal form, « City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC », and the Cagoule, he belongs to the category of mercenaries and his actions therefore fall under the Penal Code. As Pierre Bénouville himself says that he has created an organisation in Switzerland, the name of which he refrains from saying, therefore probably an entity of unknown legal form, he could be a network leader of the mercenary entity of unknown legal form, Z - OSS - MI6 - Cagoule, in France, in a way the Claude Marjory Banks, Uncle Z, in charge of the French territory.

« Our role, at the beginning of the Spanish war, was essentially to save the masterpieces of the Prado. General Davet, whom I later appointed as delegate of the Resistance Movements in Switzerland to lead the Organization that I had created, was a French airman who really worked to save the Prado. The people I knew and loved at the time had no other worries than Goya, Vellasquez... General Davet also received very high decorations from the Spanish government. »

Before the Night comes. Pierre Bénouville - Interviews with Laure Adler - Grasset 2002

In his statements to journalist Laure Adler, Pierre Bénouville said that « I had captured agents » but he did not say why he captured them and who had ordered him to do so. Then, Pierre Bénouville says : « Each time it was painful, I knew that the arrested man was going to cry, to tell me that he didn't want to die, to explain that he had children, to show me photos of his family. Each time, it was a horror. ». In view of this statement, it is legitimate to think that Pierre Bénouville is the one who kills the agent he has captured.

Pierre Bénouville does not speak of Nazis or enemies, he uses the word « agent ». If they are official agents, they are subject to the Geneva Conventions and diplomatic rules. If they were mercenaries, they came under criminal law and had to be handed over to the authorities of the country concerned, in Pierre Bénouville's case the French authorities.

Pierre Bénouville justifies the summary executions of what he calls « agents », but he is careful not to determine the criteria for identifying these « agents ». Pierre Bénouville does not say who decides on the execution of these agents, nor the reasons for their death sentence. Did Pierre Bénouville consider Minister Marx Dormoy an agent? Pierre Bénouville considered Minister Marx Dormoy to be an agent because he had refused to vote full power to Pétain, had opposed collaboration and Nazism?

In his interviews with journalist Laure Adler, Pierre Bénouville asks the question : « How is a man's life or dead decided? ». It is his or her choices, his or her actions, diseases and circumstances that decide a human haw being lives or dies. By virtue of the fundamental right to life, a society that respects the Universal Declaration of Human Rights must refrain from putting to death and executing. The democratic choice can only be that of Victor Hugo : « He who opens a school door, closes a prison ». War and state crime should be considered only as a last resort. A democratic society, respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, must choose life as a fundamental right and set an example of respect for life. Even when war is unavoidable, the Geneva Conventions require belligerents to respect the fundamental right to life by sparing and protecting civilian populations and treating prisoners properly.

What does Pierre Bénouville say after asking « How is a man's life or dead decided? ». He sais : « I killed a man in the metro during the occupation. You know, it's not difficult if you say to yourself : it's him or me. » I have been involved in all sorts of stories where decisions had to be made. I've captured agents on occasion. Each time it was painful, I knew that the arrested man was going to cry, to tell me that he didn't want to die, to explain that he had children, to show me photos of his family. Each time, it was a horror. »

Pierre Bénouville, aka Barrès, aka…, talks about a decision to be made, but as far as the decision to kill is concerned, only self-defence applies. As for killing Nazis, the genuine Resistance fighters only did so as a last resort to prevent the civilian population from suffering the consequences.

« However, from 15 March 1942, the date of the beginning of the MRPGD, to the merger of 12 March 1944, the French instructions from London and Algiers, because there was never an executive power of the resistance in France at that time, were to fight by all means, against all the enemies of our country, without terrorism, without violent actions, such as killing German soldiers, without guerrilla warfare, so as not to see fifty hostages massacred for an attack, and to avoid the influx of additional German reserve divisions before the landing, so bold, in Normandy, in June 1944. »

Michel Cailliau, aka Charette - History of the M.R.P.G.D. or a true resistance movement (1941-1945) - 1987

Pierre Bénouville claims to have killed a man in the metro during the occupation. Apart from the fact that it was almost impossible in the eyes of the Gestapo and its agents of Sub-Section IV, no Resistance member would have taken the risk of doing so to avoid being spotted and exposing Parisians to reprisals. The metro is a dangerous mousetrap for those who go underground. To commit a crime there, in the middle of the occupation, is suicide, unless you are protected by the occupation government.

In view of the facts, the Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to determine the name and place of birth of Pierre Bénouville, aka Pierre de Bénouville, aka Guillain de Bénouville, aka… as well as his various pseudonyms.

In view of the facts, the Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to determine for whom Pierre Bénouville worked, the OSS, Z, MI6, in order to determine if there was intelligence with a foreign power contrary to the interests of France and French citizens.

In view of the facts, the Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to determine what Organization Pierre Bénouville has created, if this organization is of unknown legal form and whether this unnamed organization is working in collusion with the CIA and other Parakratos City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC's agencies, MI6 and other British agencies, the BND and other German agencies or terrorist organizations of unknown legal form such as SAIC (Virginia Corporation - Washington DC) or the Cagoule in France.

In view of the facts, the Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to draw up an exhaustive list of organizations of unknown legal form, secret or not, terrorist or not, in order to determine their zones of influence and the nature of their crimes. These organizations of unknown legal form and of a terrorist nature, can, like the individuals who are part of them, exist under several names and addresses, sometimes fictitious, as is the case with of Jacques Attalli's societies.

« Jacques Attali’s companies in London and Paris

I arrived in front of 30-32 Ludgate Hill, a 7-story building between Saint Martin’s Church and Saint Paul’s Cathedral. From the look of its windows I see that it is empty. On the first floor the door step is for rent. The 6th floor at the very top looks empty too: this is where Clampton Limited was supposed to be located, a company created by Jacques José Mardoché Attali in 2004, according to the British register of companies

.

Like most British companies, its formal opening is done by an agent specialized in this type of procedure Portman International, then the first director is Bruno Boesch, a Swiss lawyer. In 2005 the shareholders are two: the SARL ACA at 28 rue Bayard, Paris 8ème and Solvica Corporation, located in the Republic of Panama. In 2006, a certain Thomas Valode, born in 1974 and therefore 32 years old, became the director. His address is 4 rue Lebouteux in Paris and his profession is « Partner Attali and Associates « In 2005, Clampton Limited is an small company with 322 000 pounds of assets. The two shareholders remain the French company ACA and the Panamanian Solvica Corporation. There is no significant change from 2007 to 2010, the assets even decreasing by half. It is only in 2010 that officially Jacques José Mardoché Attali born on November 11, 1943 becomes director of the structure, all this so that the modest firma with 176 000 pounds of capital reserve is dissolved a few months later on May 31, 2011. What is this structure and who are these people? What reality do these names, documents, addresses and numbers cover? Already in this system of nesting dolls several other structures intervene: some serve for example as secretariat like ETC Investment Limited and RM Registrars Limited. Each structure is broken down into 15 other companies that are shareholders of the parent company and are linked to Mr. Attali’s company.

The most important thing, however, is that the British company register obliges Mr. Attali to mention a personal address of residence and a date of birth: it is 123 Avenue Achille Peretti in Neuilly sur Seine where I have already gone to check what is there.

As far as the names of the people are concerned, I can’t find out anything on the internet about Bruno Boesch, a Swiss lawyer whose firm is not listed anywhere. The only public information is that the man, born in 1949, was from 2004 to 2009 a director of the Swiss Church in London, from 1997 to 2005 of Nordic Holdings Limited, and in 1994 of « 9 Herfort Street Limited », as a « British lawyer ». Bruno Boesch, in relation to Jacques Attali’s company, is therefore a kind of « straw man »

.

This is also the case of Thomas Valode, a 1997 graduate of the university of law Paris Assas, whose only occupation for 10 years, from 1999 to 2009, was to be an « associate » of Jacques Attali, as stated in his Linkedin CV[3]. Eclectic, today Thomas Valode is called « Home Catcher », in good French real estate agent.

The company SARL ACA, located at 28 rue Bayard, is listed in the Commercial Register with a SIREN number but it is no longer on http://www.societe.com. Unless « ACA » stands for « Action Collective Avocat », which means that it would still be a law firm that serves as a nominee. Curious fact, 28 rue Bayard, which belongs to Cofi Paris, borders Avenue Montaigne, a few hundred meters from the Elysée. I will go there as soon as I return to Paris to see what is there: the building, luxuriously renovated, is next to the Chanel shop windows. On the other hand, if Cofi Paris is well listed in the business intercom, there is no trace of the SARL ACA of Jacques Attali.

But what is Solvica Corporation, the main shareholder of Clampton Limited, Jacques Attali’s London company? Apparently it is a major industrial company producing solvents, coatings, adhesives and inks[4]. Its website mentions offices in the Netherlands, Germany and France. Solvica is listed on the website http://www.societe.com, under the SIREN number 843567116, with the activity of wholesale of chemicals and one or two employees. However, it does not appear at the address 9 rue du 4 Septembre in Paris, its presence in France is more symbolic than real.

On the other hand, the address appearing on the English register being that of Panama, I have no trouble finding it in the database of this Central American tax haven. Finding Jacques Attali’s presence in Panama is another investigation. For the moment I am looking at the official managers of Solvica: Eduardo Leon Herbert is a Dominican who owns the Lothian Shelf company in England, Eduardo Leon Martinez is too common a name to be able to determine which person exactly he is, and Beatrice Martinez runs the consulting company UX-IA Consulting in London. Neither of these people is related to Solvica of Great Britain which is run by Quaiser Zaman Shah. The manager of Solvica in Panama is Anzolas Robles, a big law firm.

How, in this jungle of companies with offices that are often ghostly and headquartered in tax havens, can one trace the real activities of Jacques Attali, a French political figure?

Free-in-london-29-10-3-11-2021-the-city-and-other-places-of-power-in-search-of-jacques-attali - Monika Karbowska

https://wikijusticejulianassangemonikakarbowska.wordpress.com/2022/04/06/free-in-london-29-10-3-11-2021-the-city-and-other-places-of-power-in-search-of-jacques-attali/?fbclid=IwAR0dstNMHxokUtnih3J44j70T0UsXwdBO2UREuibsQUr0wLjMqU8YvV1EJg

Pierre Bénouville himself admits his links with Allen Dulles and the subversive nature of the actions they conceived together in an interview with the journalist Laure Adler in the book Before The night comes : « Allen Dulles, the founder of the CIA, once said to me in Bern: « I want you to think about this. What would be the reaction of the Resistance, since you know it from the inside, deep in the field, in its bowels, if little by little we decided, to make things easier, to take as a symbol of the Resistance, a politician, for example Edouard Herriot? » It is hard to believe today. But I swear on my honour that these are the very words that Allen Dulles used.»

Edouard Herriot abstained during the vote of full power to Marshal Pétain. He cannot be considered as a resistant. By abstaining, he validated the abrogation of the French Constitution of 1875 (https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/les-constitutions-dans-l-histoire/constitution-de-1875-iiie-republique). He consented to the dismemberment of its institutions. He consented to the establishment of a dictatorial government by allowing Philippe Pétain to give himself full powers. Furthermore, Allen Dulles, the OSS and the Parakratos of unknown legal form City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC has no legitimacy to appoint a representative of the French Resistance.

Let us recall that the US government, that is to say the Parakratos of unknown legal form City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC maintains relations with the Vichy Regime in the person of Camille Chautemps who, as soon as the collaborationist government was proclaimed, left on a mission for Vichy in Washington : « Laval is not idle. He must now « liquidate » Mr. Albert Lebrun. Who could he send to the President of the Republic to persuade him that resign? Of course, he could not think of a member of his staff. There was Chautemps, who was to go to Washington as the Marshal's special envoy, but his relationship with the subtle Camille was not a good one. » (The Treason Notebooks - Backstage of Vichy by a witness - Paris - Librairie des Sciences et des Arts.)

« In November 1940, entrusted with an unofficial mission, he left for Washington, D.C., and chose to stay there until 1944, when he went to French North Africa. Despite his written protests against the roundups of Jews, he was sentenced in March 1947 by the High Court in absentia to five years in prison. He was granted an amnesty in 1954. He then divided his life between Paris and Washington, D.C., where his family lived. He is buried in Rock Creek Cemetery in Washington, D.C. »

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camille_Chautemps

Another member of the Vichy government, Gaston Bergery, has links with Russia, England and America, as he was married to a Russian, an English and an American. The information concerning informations about Gaston Bergery are contradictory as regards his wives. He would have had 3 wives but the first one would be French and not English according to his Wikipedia file. « Gaston Bergery marries Germaine Malançon (1900-1982) in 1920 and Lioubov Krassine (1908-1991), daughter of the revolutionary Leonid Krassine, in 1927. She gave him a son, Jean-François Bergery (1927-1977), a future journalist and scriptwriter, before divorcing him the following year in 1928. She then married Emmanuel d'Astier de La Vigerie. In 1934 he married Elizabeth (known as Bettina) Shaw-Jones (1902-1993), Elsa Schiaparelli's assistant, for the third time. » https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaston_Bergery) Like François Mitterrand and Hubert Védrine, Gaston Bergery is decorated with the Francisque

« On the stage, Bergery replaced Laval. After the official, the unofficial. The deputy of Mantes is a singular character - he is said to have been born of a German father - undoubtedly he has, from the people across the Rhine, the face, the type, the method. Married three times, he married a Russian, an English and an American. In Parliament, he roughly went it alone. During the Staviski Affair, he was involved in the scandals of the time. In fact, Herriot's former chief of staff possesses fierce ambition, talent, audacity, composure, and a complete lack of scruples to push himself. He too believes his time has come. For several days, Bergery has been looking for signatures for a declaration. This is the one he has just read. The document is long. It contains passages that are nothing but malicious insinuations, lies and cleverly distilled bile. It is really necessary to stop there. One remains astonished to note that sixty-eight parliamentarians have adhered to this factum, and one remains taken aback to find among them twenty-three deputies who claim to be SFIO socialists. Will the debate end without a single voice chasing away all its pettiness? Will the Republic not at least have a nice funeral?

The Treason Notebooks - Backstage of Vichy by a witness - Paris - Librairie des Sciences et des Arts - 1945

A third man is considered an agent in the service of the enemy in Vichy. He was Pierre Laval. « M. Lebrun has not, moreover, changed his opinion of the character and when, a few days ago, Marshal Pétain came to ask him to sign decrees appointing Laval vice-president of the Council to replace Chautemps who had been called to other ministerial functions, the President of the Republic made no attempt to hide his repugnance. You cannot, he said to the Marshal, introduce into your government this corrupt man who is certainly an agent of the foreigner. » (The Treason Notebooks - Backstage of Vichy by a witness - Paris - Librairie des Sciences et des Arts.)

Let us remember that Marx Dormoy voted against full powers for Philippe Pétain and that he was assassinated by the Cagoule. It should be remembered that Pierre Bénouville is a member of the Cagoule and alleged leader of the Cagoule.

Not only does Pierre Bénouville declare that he knows Allen Dulles, but also that they interfere together in the internal politics of France. As far as Pierre Bénouville was concerned, there was indeed intelligence with a foreign power, and therefore treason. And, as far as Allen Dulles, the OSS and the entities of unknown legal form in the pay of the City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC are concerned, there is interference with a sovereign country and an attempt to subversively appropriate power. It is a declaration of war and as far as Charle de Gaulle, the Allies and the French Resistance are concerned, sabotage and treason. Pierre Bénouville and Allen Dulles acted together against the interests of France and against the interests of the allies, represented by De Gaulle, Churchill and Stalin, during World War II.

« Bénouville, who passed without transition from the pre-war Cagoule to the occupation MSR, a false Gaullist subservient to Allen Dulles and an obsessive anti-communist, had been the subject since the liberation of very complacent police reports, which had become academic doxa : Mme Vergez-Chaignon, lyrically, sees in him the incarnation of this resistance which is neither republican nor left-wing, but distraught with patriotic transcendence. A friend of Frenay, leader with him of the motley cohort of Hardy's protectors, Bénouville make the weather of the justice system, where his close friend Fradin reigned. The door had been open since 1944 to keep the worst culprits out of prison and out of court, starting with his friends in the Cagoule, from Eugène Schueller to Jean de Castellane.

Thus, Bénouville, very attached to his false noble name (Guillain de Bénouville), called Fradin to the rescue of his friend Jean P. Arnaud, owner of the « Confitures et Conserves alimentaires de Marseille » factory (EMMOP affair), whose directors, notorious collaborators and great admirers of the Marshal, charged with trading with the enemy, had fled the city in October 1944. On 15 November, he submitted to Fradin the case of Arnaud, who was in prison at the time, urging him to save him from the clutches of the PCF and the CGT, that is to say, from a staff unanimous in its accusations, which would have the management of the company for several months.

Fradin won Arnaud the full support of De Menthon and, on the spot, that of Charles Dubosten, public prosecutor and government commissioner at the Marseille court of justice since September 1944.

The latter had himself been in great need of high protections: public prosecutor in Pontarlier (December 1940), public prosecutor in Amiens (February 1941), then, since November 1942, deputy public prosecutor in Toulon, he had compromised himself so much that he "feared being arrested" at the Liberation. In mid-May 1945, Dubost announced to Fradin that the Arnaud case (...) would be closed.

The investigating judge René Bouquier, « one of the best judges I have met, and the best in Marseilles », swore Dubost : « full of qualities of character and as (...) modest as he is energetic », he « deserves to be pushed » (as Dubost would have been under the occupation). After a « final confrontation » of form - I do not know with whom - Arnaud, received in May by Fradin on the recommendation of Bénouville, learned on the 25th « that a favourable solution » would be reached shortly.

In April, Fradin had « authorised » the Marseille public prosecutor to present him with his wishes for « advancement ». After the painful parenthesis of the court of justice, of which De Menthon's second-in-command regularly announced the eminent end, Dubost imagined himself as an advocate general in Marseilles, or « transferred » to Paris with a more modest position « on an equal footing » (i.e. substitute). But, he wrote on 12 April, « I prefer to be head of department, to be the first in my village than the second in Rome ». « I like the risks and responsibilities better than the intrigues between colleagues », etc. Admittedly, this rise is « technically » contradictory « with the restoration of the promotion table ». « In any case (Sic), I will not forget that you have distinguished me among all my colleagues and I will be infinitely grateful to you whatever the response of ministers and offices. »

It was quick. In the first two weeks of May, Fradin received, at the Place Vendôme, much more warmly than his peers would welcome Debenest on his return from deportation, this faithful interpreter, in Marseilles, of the demands of the ministry, of Fradin and of the PG of Aix Gallut.

Thank you. It is the certainty of an improvement of our material situation... We must think about it. Because we have two little girls and the salary of a first class substitute, even after the last increases, is quite miserable. »

The non-purification of France - From 1943 to the 1950s - Annie Lacroix-Riz - Armand Collin 2019

An entity of unknown legal form that is not a sovereign country cannot declare war on a sovereign country. Pierre Bénouville and Allen Dulles therefore acted as terrorists by using mercenaries by carrying out a subversive attack from Switzerland against the institutions of France and the citizens who were fighting to free it from the enemy that had invaded it.

In view of the facts, the Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to determine who gave the order to execute Marx Dormoy.

The Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to determine who were the members of the Cagoule who ordered the assassination of Minister Marx Dormoy and whether they did so in collusion with entities of unknown legal form such as Z, MI6, OSS, etc.

In view of the facts, the Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to determine whether entities of unknown legal form, based in Switzerland, under the orders of the Mountabetten-Windsor brotherhood, Z, OSS, MI6, etc. were working in collaboration with the Abvher, the German secret service, The Cagoule, and Vichy’s Government.

Pierre Bénouville denies having collaborating with the abvehr yet, although claiming to be a Resistance fighter, before the war, he buys dachshunds, in Munich, from Admiral Canaris' secretary.  There are many dachshund farms in Germany but Pierre Bénouville buys his dogs from the secretary of Admiral Canaris, head of the Abverh.

« After the publication of Pierre Péan's book, a journalist asked what my contacts with the Abwehr might have been. To me? Well, look, there is a form of indecency. In fact, I had contacts with the Abwehr but not those. And in spite of myself, because of my love for dachshunds. Before the war, a friend of mine told me that the most beautiful dachshunds could be found at Baroness X in Munich. I went there. It was an amazing house. I arrived in a big living room. A man greeted me very kindly and sold me a beautiful dachshund. Dachshunds in Germany are local deities! Germans can't say « Shön » without bending down, no matter how big they are, and petting them. And I understood that passing the controls with a dachshund meant passing through an armoured door with the key and the combination. This baroness was none other than the secretary of Admiral Canaris. He was the Abwehr. So that day I was really close to the people of the Abwehr.

(…)

The Germans came closer and closer to me. I could feel the trap closing in on me. So I decided to move to the Hotel Bristol. To have the look of this chic hotel, I took care to buy a suitcase at Hermès in which I put the biggest book I could find, from Gallimard, which was Dostoïsvski's diary - what a beautiful book - and then I put on pyjamas and something to wash myself, and I arrived with a taxi. I said to the doorman, « I would like a quiet room. » He didn't know who I was. He put me up. He said « you know, this is a chance! The officer to whom this bedroom is assigned is currently on leave in Germany ». It makes your blood run cold.

When I was finally alone in this room, I took inventory. I found not only his outfit, but his battle dress. And the next day I tried on her outfit, in his bedroom. It was a kind of challenge to myself. I had the helmet on my head when there was a knock on the door. I hid the helmet before going to open the door. It was one of his comrades who wanted to borrow an item of clothing. He asked me if I knew him, I preferred to say no. I tried as hard as I could to send him away but nothing helped.

It was extraordinary, this situation where I was forced to take on the identity of my enemy. I stayed in that room for a week. I had arrived at the Bristol, exhausted, hungry, because in those days finding food was an obsession. In this luxury hotel, all I had to do was phone room service and they would bring me whatever I wanted on a tray. »

Before the night falls - Interviews by Pierre Bénouville with Laure Adler - Grasset et Fasquelle - 2002

« During the German occupation, the Bristol was one of the few large hotels in Paris not requisitioned by the Germans as it housed many American diplomats. In June 1940, it became the headquarters of the US Embassy and all Americans living in Paris. » (https://tpepalacesparisiens.wordpress.com/2016/02/29/des-lieux-convoites-lors-de-la-seconde-guerre-mondiale/)

In the above confession do to journalist Laure Adler, Pierre Bénouville aka..., explains that, surrounded by the enemy - it remains to be seen which one - he finds refuge in the US Embassy in Paris where Nazi soldiers live. These Nazis rent or requisition rooms all year round as they leave their uniforms and belongings there when they are on leave. It is therefore legitimate to think that the Americans collaborated with the Nazis since they put rooms at their disposal in the Bristol Hotel, hotel which served as their Embassy during World War II. Any embassy is an enclave of a sovereign country's territory on another sovereign country, so if the Americans are hosting the military of an occupying country on that territory, it is because they are allies of that occupying country.

In view of the facts, the Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to determine if the Americans, to the orders of Parakratos City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC have allowed the Nazi troops to position themselves on their territory, be it within their embassy in Paris, and have lent them a helping hand to destroy the French and international resistance networks, working for the allied forces led by De Gaulle, Churchill and Stalin.

At this stage of the investigation, it is clear that subversive forces infiltrated the institutions of the French state as well as those of the English state, before World War II. To understand the stakes of this hot war, never ended by a peace treaty, followed by a cold war still in progress, maintained by outbreaks of war that one part of the belligerents triggers to generate chaos making any peace negotiation impossible, it is necessary to determine which forces are opposing each other since they are not sovereign countries.

Composition of the World Parakratos

Since the « world coup d’état » orchestrated, in the years ?... (Ongoing investigations do not allow, to this day, to establish an exact date), by Laval-Pétain in collusion with the Parkratos City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC and the nazis German government an totally or partially, the institutions of sovereign countries.

All sovereign countries, respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter, have been the objects of constant subversive attacks by this Parakratos since 1946. It is at the origin of what the media has called the « cold war ». A cold war is a subversive war. Operation Covid 19 is a terrorist attack, on a global scale, against civilian populations in order to take control of sovereign states. This kind of operation, which is based on mass manipulation and propaganda, is typical of a cold war (see WJJA Information Circular). In France, the terrorist entity in charge of the Covid 19 terrorist operation is publicly known as the French-German Defence and Security Council.

In order to carry out its terrorist actions on French territory, the Parakratos Franco-Germanic Defence Council relies on several administrative or industrial levers which it has previously infiltrated and subjected to pressure of a terrorist nature (blackmail, verbal violence, manipulation, threats, mental torture, etc.) to force them to carry out their directives :

National education

School and university administrators and teachers are guilty of torture, segregation and genocide by imposing the wearing of masks (torture), by applying segregation rules (blackmail for the injection of genetic modification imposed by the Parakratos ) and therefore of crimes against humanity.

School and university administrators and teachers are guilty of crimes against humanity.

In some French schools, children still wear masks. The psychological and physical damage will be irreversible for many of them. We can speak of a lost generation.

Transport companies (RATP - SNCF)

The management and employees of the SNCF and RATP applied segregation measures by imposing the wearing of masks on their employees, by forbidding access to their infrastructures to citizens refusing to wear a mask and by applying a blackmail to employees who refused to be injected with a genetic modification product.

The management and employees of the SNCF and RATP are guilty of crimes against humanity

Police and Justice

The Code of Ethics of the French police has been modified by decree (Création Décret n°2013-1113 du 4 décembre 2013 - art.). Responsible for this modification: Pierre Joxe and Emmanuel Valls under François Hollande presidency.

Is it constitutional for a code of ethics to be the subject of a decree? The answer is « NO »!

Pierre Joxe and Emmanuel Valls having violated the French constitution, it is clear that France, under the presidency of François Hollande, is not a sovereign country but is in the hands of an entity of unknown legal form.

Some of the police officers warned the institutions and the prosecutor's office about this violation of the law, but no measures were taken by justice and parliament to prevent this terrorist entity from violating the constitution and betraying the French.

Both the Hollande government and the Macron government are illegal governments. The Mitterrand Government, the Hollande Government as well as the Macron Government are three illegal governments that have violated the French Constitution and, therefore, harmed the interests of France and its citizens.

The French police warned the parliament, the Senate and the judiciary about the illegal nature of the Joxe-Valls decree and about its Petainist and therefore Nazi nature, but none of the civil servants or elected representatives in charge of the State Security deigned to react. It is legitimate to think that the French parliamentarians and senators are in the service of the Parakratos Gang Mitterrand, now the Franco-German Defence Council, since they have not taken any measures to preserve the state police.

As in 1941, the parliament and the officials in charge of France's security and interests have violated the Constitution and thus betrayed the interests of France and the French. However, French police officers, anxious to fulfil their duty as protectors of institutions, have warned them.

« I am the master says Pétain.

Laval will now try to convince the Marshal to act as a dictator. The truth is that he does not have to make much of an effort. No sooner had he told Marshal Pétain of President Lebrun's refusal than Pétain was left empty-handed:

BUT I AM NEVERTHELESS THE MASTER ALL MY LEGAL ADVISERS SAY SO.

In uttering these words, Pétain reveals such a senile ambition for power that Laval soon becomes convinced that by flattering this senility, he will have the Marshal at his mercy.

BUT, « MONSIEUR LE MARECHAL », I WANTED TO PROPOSE TO YOU THAT YOU PROMULGATE THE FIRST CONSTITUTIONAL ACT IN WHICH YOU' LL QUALIFY YOURSELF THE HEAD OF THE FRENCH STATE AND ABROGATE THE CONSTITUTION OF 1875. 

Very good, very good, said the marshal with childlike joy.

Suspicious, however, he says: Put yourself agree with Alibert.

And benevolent, he adds : Prepare the act by which I appoint you as my successor.»

The Treason Notebooks - Backstage of Vichy by a witness - Paris Librairie des Sciences et des Arts - 1945

In three constitutional acts, Philippe Pétain voted himself full powers, abrogated the Constitution of 1875 and proclaimed a dictatorship. Let us remember that Marshal Pétain is the media leader of the Cagoule, its showcase in a way.

« So, concluded Deloncle, despite these interruptions, we secretly organised a strong contingent of determined men. This alert showed our strength. Our troops are not quite ready but they will be soon. It is a matter of days.

The one who is not ready is our leader, he added abruptly.

And who is our leader? asked Duseigneur naively.

Marshal Pétain.

And me ? said Duseigneur.

There is no confusion, retorted Deloncle. You are the occult leader. The Marshal will be our leader before the public. He is the one we have all chosen because he thinks like us.

The republic has had its day. Personal power is needed. And who more worthy of this power than the most glorious soldier in France? Our movement is above all military. »

All the truth about the Cagoule Case - His treachery, his crimes, his men - Paris - Librairie des Sciences et des Arts - 1946

The transformation of the French police into a militia by the Joxe-Valls decree has led some policemen to commit crimes and crimes against Humanity : violation of the freedom of expression, of demonstration, attack on life, discrimination, torture, abusive incarceration, violation of the constitution and therefore treason. The French police chiefs and parliament have validated the violation of the French constitution and obeyed unconstitutional and therefore criminal directives.

The transformation of the French police into a militia by the Joxe-Valls decree has led some french policemen officers mercenaries in the service of an illegal entity, of unknown form, of a terrorist nature. Their actions have no legality and all fall under the criminal code. They are not agents of the law.

In view of the facts described above, it is legitimate to think that the French police force has been infiltrated by subversive elements who have taken over its management. It is also legitimate to consider that the National Assembly and the Senate have also been infiltrated by subversive elements who have taken control.

In view of the facts, the Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to determine whether chiefs or members of the French national police and police forces, belong to entities of unknown legal form such as the Cagoule, Z, MI6, etc. or to sects, Rose Croix, Opus Dei, or to secret societies such as Bildeberg or Le Siècle. It should be remembered that Allen Dulles is a Knight of Malta.

« The brotherhood's Catholic and aristocratic roots made the modern knights fervently anti-communist. The order has been largely responsible for the construction of the CIA, and many of its global covert operations. The founding fathers of the CIA William « Wild Bill » Donovan and Allen Dulles were knights, as were many other CIA hierarchy including Ronald Reagan's director William Casey and JFK's director John McCone. According to « Watergate » journalist Carl Bernstein, Casey gave Pope John Paul II unprecedented access to CIA intelligence including spy satellites and agents. 

(…)

Membership in Latin America includes Masonic lodge « P2 » fascists and many surviving Nazi players, who are directly responsible for the formation of the modern neo-Nazi movement. Knight and Nazi escapee Otto « Scarface » Skorzeny, who led a commando raid on the Cathar region of France in search of occult artifacts including the Holy Grail, played a major role in the Vatican's « Rat Run ». He was a close friend of Argentinian president and knight Juan Peron, who recent CIA documents prove was also involved in the laundering of Nazi gold through the Vatican Bank. Conveniently for Nazi members who did not escape Europe, William Donovan served as chief aide to the American prosecutor at the post-war Nuremberg trials, after handing over the reigns of the OSS/CIA to fellow knight Allen Dulles.

As Roman Catholic author Penny Lernoux reveals in her « People of God »: « After the war, the Vatican, the OSS, the SS, and various branches of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta joined to do battle against the common Soviet enemy - and to help Nazi war criminals escape... Baron Luigi Parrilli, an Italian aristocrat and Knight of Malta/papal chamberlain, took part in negotiations between SS leaders and the CIA's Allen Dulles ».

Prior to working for the OSS (he headed the OSS station in Switzerland during the war) Allen Dulles and his law partner John Foster had served as business managers and lawyers to John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil. They personally brokered the partnership between Standard Oil and I.G. Farben chemical corporation. I.G.Farben not only produced gasoline for the Nazi war machine, it manufactured « Zyklon B », used slave labor before and during the war (including their huge petro-chemical factory adjacent to Auschwitz death camp), owned Bayer Pharmaceuticals which according to a current lawsuit was directly involved in Dr. Josef Mengele's horrific Auschwitz experiments, and was spared from Allied bombings due to its Rockefeller interests. Leading war-time journalist George Seldes attempted to reveal this « unholy alliance » through his newspaper articles, but was rarely published at the time, and efforts were made to kill him. Joseph Heller's satirical novel « Catch 22 » made light of this insanity with his « we agreed to bomb our own bases in return for the Nazis buying our chocolate covered cotton.

The Protestant equivalent of the Catholic Knights of Malta, also known as the Order of St. John of Jerusalem, gained greater credibility when the head of the British Empire HM Queen Victoria became their Sovereign Head in 1888. This Order of St. John, whose current Sovereign Head is HM Queen Elizabeth II, similarly use the Cross of Malta insignia as their emblem. While they too claim that charity and protecting the poor are their main cause, this has been used as a tool of Western Imperialism for the last 1000 years, and began with the first Crusades to occupy Jerusalem. These « charitable concerns » are unlikely to take precedence over their secret historical agenda--the fulfillment of the prophecies of St. John the Divine, whose Revelation acts as a political template for these historically-intoxicated and reactionary-minded organizations. It is additionally disturbing that the Protestant Order of St. John was recently granted non-Governmental membership of the United Nations. Like its Catholic counterpart, this UN position gives the Protestant Order greater access to UN decision-making and vulnerable developing countries. Undoubtedly, the interests of the Vatican, the British Crown, and its Rosicrucian fraternity, will take precedence over any genuine aid offered to the world's poorest and needy. »

https://yourphotocard.com/Crusades/Knights%20of%20Malta.htm

« In their book Les frères invisibles, the main reference for this chapter, Ghislaine Ottenheimer and Renaud Lecadre wrote about Jacques Chirac : « High-grade masons claim that he was initiated into the Grande Loge Alpina, a very elitist Swiss obedience." 

(…)

But, comments Ghislaine Ottenheimer, « the membership of certain personalities in Freemasonry is protected as a state secret ».

High-ranking Masons are very hostile to the lifting of the secrecy of membership. For a Grand Officer of the Grande Loge Nationale Française (GLNF), "secrecy is one of the deepest springs of the human being. It is one of the most powerful fantasies. Since the most advanced NATO strategies require a high degree of secrecy, it is understandable that certain strategists, often Masons themselves, have relied heavily on this spring and this fantasy. They have sometimes complicated the game (the classic strategy of concentric circles) by embarking on a sort of modern algebra of sects or chivalric Orders, with key figures at the intersections: no follower knows that his guru or Grand Master also controls several other sects or Orders. We are now entering the realm of esoteric cuisine, the main purpose of which is to be unintelligible to the average person : so I will only mention a few rudiments of this algebra.

(…)

French « regular » masonry - of the Rectified Scottish Rite - had taken refuge in Switzerland since the Revolution. It « will be reborn thanks to the tenacity of a member of the Swiss Grand Lodge Alpina, Edouard de Ribeaucourt. [With his friends from the English Lodge of Bordeaux, [...] he created in 1913 the Independent and Regular National Grand Lodge for France and the Colonies, a symptomatic title since it quickly took the lead in the colonial lobby, before being renamed GLNF. According to the Rectified Scottish Rite, « every candidate to the GLNF must take an oath on the Gospel of St. John and swear fidelity to the holy Christian religion. At the beginning of each « tenue »[meeting], the Bible is opened on the altar. The GLNF would take off in the aftermath of World War II with « the installation of the Nato headquarters in Paris » and the arrival of « thousands of American, Canadian and British servicemen, wishing to practice their country's Masonry.

(…)

Significant clue: « The current European headquarters of American Freemasonry is still located in Heidelberg, the headquarters of the Allied forces occupying Germany after the Second World War. In the first three Atlanticist strategies (nuclearisation, stay behind, parallel finance), most of the European actors will belong to obediences recognised by the Anglo-Saxons.

(…)

But let's go back to Switzerland. We remember that the future head of the CIA, Allen Dulles, had already cooked up the stay behind in 1942, redrawing the ideological borders of Europe. This is no coincidence. Switzerland is a European bastion of « regular » Freemasonry. From 1848 to 1914, all the presidents of the Confederation belonged to the Swiss Grand Lodge Alpina. From 1914 onwards, « there was always a majority of members in the Federal Council who were either members of Freemasonry, or under its direct influence.

(…)

The influence of the Grande Loge Suisse Alpina (GLSA) is decisive in the banking centres of Zurich, Geneva and Basel. As an Anglo-Saxon rite, Swiss Freemasonry has in many ways held a strategic position in American schemes. It is easy to understand why the GLSA was elitist (about 4,000 members, two-thirds of them French-speaking). In addition to Jacques Chirac, two other Frenchmen are said to be affiliated with it: Patrick Maugein, a strange character to whom I will devote a chapter, and, according to a reliable but uncross-checked source, the governor of the Bank of France, Jean-Claude Trichet.

(…)

The GLNF experienced a hiatus in 1965 when Nato moved from Paris to Brussels. Jean Baylot, a former police prefect in Paris, was the architect of the revival with Yves Trestournel, who was appointed secretary of the association governing the obedience in 1972. In 1980, both of them pushed Jean Mons, former director of cabinet of the presidents of the Council Léon Blum and Paul Ramadier - the one who negotiated the implantation of the stay behind in France - to the head of the GLNF. It is not surprising, in these conditions, that Mons was compromised in the traffic of piastres, a source of money to finance the war in Indochina.

(…)

For quite some time now, it has been luring African potentates, even if it means poaching some of them from the Grand Orient de France. Little by little, the richest accomplices in the plundering of their countries, the dictators turned into election riggers, joined the GLNF: the Gabonese Omar Bongo, the Congolese Denis Sassou Nguesso, the Moroccan King Hassan II, the Burkinabe Blaise Compaoré, the Chadian Idriss Déby, the Cameroonian Paul Biya... They are all friends of Jacques Chirac, who welcomes them with a large embrace. They were promoted to the highest ranks. In Gabon, the GLNF has taken over the three hundred people who « count » in one fell swoop. It also colonised the French side of Françafrique: intermediaries such as Pierre Falcone, or his associate Arcadi Gaydamak, officers of the Services and the Marine Infantry, the top management of Elf. 

The neo-Gaullist businessmen are pouring in: Jean-Claude Méry, Jacky Chaisaz, Francis Guillot, Henri Montaldo, Michel Mouillot, Michel Pacary, Francis Poullain, Jean-Paul Schimpf, Didier Schuller, Christian Schwartz, Flatto Sharon... If we know their names, it is because they have been in the most apparent: public markets, real estate, construction... But the brothers of the GLNF also control Françafrique, the arms lobby, a good part of the nuclear and oil industries, finance, gambling, betting and casinos: if we add up the unofficial margins generated in all these sectors, we reach at least twenty billion euros per year. A lot of grist for the mill, a lot of room for manoeuvre... protected by the control of the major media and a strong presence in the upper judiciary.

(…)

It is nevertheless curious that high ranking officials of a hierarchical institution, who are supposed to know its secret rules, should evoke a double bottom of secrecy, a submerged part of the iceberg, of occult networks. At a plenary meeting of the Sovereign Grand Committee, former DGSE boss Pierre Marion, Grand Porte Glaive, asked for « an investigation into the activities of Trestournel ». A band of strongmen immediately surrounded him: « We will have your hide. The same Marion, in a letter to Charbonniaud, suggests that the GLNF secretary boasts « without restraint of being a confirmed Grand Master ‘puppeteer’. » Ottenheimer and Lecadre say of Trestournel that he is an « absolute master », a « key man ». « He knows everything ». Pierre Marion confided in them: « He is very strong, he had the ability to coiled an years he has been the head of the obedience, he has had everyone under control. »

The two journalists did not dare to transcribe the rather transparent adjective that describes the organisation as « coiled ». One is obviously thinking of the stay behind methods. What could be more tempting than grafting a piece of secret service onto a secret society? When he commanded the DGSE, Pierre Marion was the boss of the Action Service, the French relay of the stay behind. General Jeannou Lacaze headed this service before becoming Chief of Staff of the French Army and embarking on an endless career as a military adviser to the French-African dictators. He is perfectly at ease in the GLNF, in « the very secret lodge La Lyre, not numbered in the GLNF directory, for fear that the still ingenuous brothers might not know its composition…". He rubbed shoulders with two former Bouygues executives, Jean-François Humbert and Pierre Boireau. La Lyre went to Brazzaville to celebrate the elevation to the title of Grand Master of a valiant fighter for the free world and for oil, the ex-Marxist Denis Sassou Nguesso, whose return to power was accompanied by a flurry of crimes against humanity. 

Some of the brothers were moved by this celebration, « while corpses filled the streets of Brazzaville ». They did not understand that, for some, the war has never stopped, a war of many forms: barbouzard, energy, economic, financial. Let's remember that, according to the protocol on the stay behind negotiated by Ramadier, "the network includes an occult cell within the main official military services (Military Security, external services, etc.) and civilians (General Intelligence, General Secretariat of National Defence, etc.).  « One of the army fraternities, the Groupement Amical de la Défense Nationale (GADN), is [...] extremely secretive, » Ottenheimer and Lecadre found.

(…)

Yves Trestournel does not hide it: « If the French leaders want to understand something about Africa, they have to talk to the masons… » Pasqua knows something about this! Practically all the Ministers of Cooperation (after those of the Colonies) were Masons. « Except Jean-Pierre Cot, whose nomination in 1981 was perceived as a provocation. Trestournel created a specific lodge in the GLNF, Les Cabires, « for apprentice grand masters of Franco-African affairs ».

(…)

The virulent criticism left Yves Trestournel unperturbed. At the end of 2001, he promoted a faithful member, Jean-Charles Foellner, to succeed Grand Master Charbonniaud. Foellner was Provincial Grand Master of the Côte d'Azur from 1982 onwards, a member of the Laurent le Magnifique Lodge, a Province and a Lodge symbolising all the excesses. A flamboyant member of this Lodge, the mayor of Cannes, Michel Mouillot, openly handed over all public contracts to the brothers; he became head of a real estate project on the island of Petit-Moustique, in the Caribbean, alongside the sulphurous international « financier », Armando Nano.

(…)

The Fifth Republic was born of a coup d'état wanted by NATO, with the participation of a stay behind network very much inclined towards the extreme right. The latter did not take kindly to the General's realistic reversal on the Algerian question. But Jacques Foccart, in liaison with NATO, never ceased to use these henchmen for his French and African barbouzeries - in return for an internship, for example, with the Rhodesian or South African apartheid regimes, or at Denard's ranch in Gabon.

(…)

Other « infiltrations » are in the public domain. A military intelligence officer, Philippe Guglielmi, became Grand Master of the Grand Orient. The current Grand Master, Alain Bauer, a member of the PS at the age of 15, passed through the FO union (created by the stay behind) and the SAIC, in San Diego, a company that works almost exclusively for the American services. He was, he explains, in charge of a top-secret mission between France and the United States, involving national defence. Then he became a security consultant, co-authoring books on the subject with Xavier Raufer, aka Christian de Bongrain, who himself had been a member of the extreme right-wing groups Occident and Ordre nouveau (New Order). The co-authors « praise the radical methods used across the Atlantic to fight petty crime. ».

(…)

Initiates must take an oath to « conscientiously observe the principles of the Masonic order », never to reveal its « mysteries and secrets » on pain of a « punishment which cannot be less than having the throat cut, the tongue torn out by the root. » Brotherly solidarity is one of these principles. Perhaps because they failed to do so, many Masons « disappeared in a curious way ». Ottenheimer and Lecadre draw up a list of them: Claude Bez, CEO of the Century company; Marc Delachy, CEO of the Masons' Association of France of the Century company; Marc Delachaux, who died « of a heart attack while diving from his boat », then his associate Glenn Souham, « murdered in front of his home »; the policeman Daniel Voiry, pilot of an enormous corruption system at the Paris police headquarters (« committed suicide » in an Intermarché car park); Roger Loebb, Worshipful of the Jerusalem Lodge, frequented by Flatto Sharon; Louis Sidéri, Grand Treasurer of the GLNF, who himself « committed suicide with cyanide » in 1996; Pascal Sarda, involved in the RCAF scandal, victim of an « unfortunate car accident »; René Lucet, « committed suicide by two bullets in the head » in 1982; Minister Robert Boulin, « committed suicide » in 1979; Joseph Fontanet, found dead in front of his home in 1980, shot in the back; Joseph Doucé, found dead in the Rambouillet forest in 1990; Jean-Claude Méry, victim of a fulgurating cancer; Michel Baroin; Roger-Patrice Pelat; François de Grossouvre…

[Bribery] involves an intermediary demanding money from a company director or executive to obtain a contract. In short, it is a racket. If the boss wants to remain in line with his conscience, he refuses. If he accepts, he is often initially reluctant. So, meeting places and codes are created: hunting in sumptuous castles, alcohol, easy women. We co-opt ourselves into Freemasonry. And then you become a brother, one of the cogs in the machine, one of the links in a chain. But for these people, the embrace is the mafia kiss. And they think that all Freemasons are like them.

Since they use the same vocabulary, the boundaries between Freemasonry, Rosicrucians, the multiple Templar or Solar Orders, are not always very clear. "In the 18th century, [...] some Freemason currents invented a Templar filiation. The Rosicrucians inspired the highest ranks of the GLF. The most widely practised Freemasonry rite in the world is called Rosicrucian in England. Even Scientology is involved: according to Ottenheimer and Lecadre, the GO and the GLNF are notoriously infiltrated by Scientology.

(…)

Christophe Deloire's Enquête sur la France templière remains a valuable introduction.

« On June 12, 1952, at the Château d'Arginy, in the Beaujolais region, the vanished Order of the Temple resurfaced once again. It was in this same building that Hugues de Payns had founded it. [...] That day, the eminent occultist Jacques Breyer rekindled the flame of the crusades. His « miracles » set the small world of esotericism ablaze and revived the soldier-monks. Jacques Breyer was surrounded by Freemasons, notably from the Grande Loge Nationale Française (GLNF). Convinced by this revival, a thousand brothers who were keen on Templar rites left the GLNF and created a new obedience: the Opera Masonic Lodge. The secret services, including the Sdece, the forerunner of the DGSE, took a close interest in the Templar revival born in Arginy, which was named Sovereign Order of the Solar Temple (OSTS)

(…)

Masonry has, if one may say so, served as a cement. All the more so because from Paul Delouvrier [the first president] to François Roussely, via Marcel Boiteux.

Gilles Ménage or Edmond Alphandéry, all of them, with perhaps one exception, are masons. I ended up being initiated myself, declared a manager of the public company. Elf? A « three-point fiefdom ». « Among the many protagonists implicated in the Elf affair, directly or indirectly, one would be hard pressed to find a layman. The former CEO Loïk Le Floch, perhaps…". As soon as all the actors protected and controlled each other, public opinion no longer knew much about certain major choices made in the context of French participation in the Cold War, such as nuclear proliferation and the neo-colonisation of Africa. How, then, could these choices be challenged?

Didier Schuller, another neo-Gaullist tenor of parallel financing, also prosecuted by the judge Éric Halphen, has long illustrated this impunity to the point of caricature. In charge of the Office HLM of Hauts-de-Seine, this high roller, « Venerable » of the « Silence » lodge (GLNF), fled in 1995 via Geneva and the Bahamas before an international arrest warrant was issued against him. He settled in Santo Domingo, where he lived like a pasha, without the French police and justice system being concerned. His son Antoine raised the issue. In an interview with Laurent Valdiguié of Le Parisien, he detailed Didier Schuller's close relationship with the American consul William Kirkman, former head of the CIA in the Caribbean. For his false papers and those of his companion, the fugitive would have had « official Belgian stamps »

According to his son, Didier Schuller became « crazy with joy » when he learned of the resignation of Judge Halphen: « We got him! » So a collective was chasing the judge? At the end of 1994, Schuller had used the latter's father-in-law, Jean-Pierre Maréchal (GLNF), to try to compromise the son-in-law, which caused a great scandal. "The investigators of the Schuller-Maréchal affair have acquired a certainty: [...] a network of police officers and Freemasons lawyers was discreetly activated at the time. First to destabilise the judge, who was threatening both the RPR and construction companies, then to exfiltrate Didier Schuller [...]. Schuller is said to have been helped by this mysterious network throughout his escape..».

Extract from Noir Chirac -François-Xavier Verschave - Les Arènes 2002

https://survie.org/themes/francafrique/article/cia-et-inities-le-temple-et-ses

Constitutional Law - Nazi Law

The constitution is the rule of conduct of a state. It is the body of fundamental laws that all laws voted on and passed must respect. In a democracy, it is validated by the people in its entirety and can only be changed after the people have been consulted for agreement. « Any society in which the guarantee of rights is no longer assured, nor the separation of powers determined, has no Constitution. » (Art. 16 - French Constitution of 4 October 1958) In a democracy, the executive, legislative and judicial powers must be separated. These three powers must be independent, autonomous and take their decisions only after a contradictory debate which guarantees the democratic functioning.

« In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. (…) The light, the true light, that which enlightens every man, was coming into the world.» (Gospel of John - New Testament). Whether one believes in God or not, this teaching is universal because it means that it is through the word that Man becomes civilised since he can communicate with his fellow human beings, that Man can attain knowledge (The Light), that Man can discover truths and thus understand the world around him and interact with it. If the Word is God and was in God, it is because God used it to link people together. This allegory therefore means that it is through articulated language that man solves his problems. Any law is therefore only the public proclamation of a common agreement between men, this written agreement having for vocation to decide between them in case of dispute. The law is a social production taken from the morality of a given society. In France, this morality is defined in the Constitution and its motto Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité. The first rules of life in society were set down verbally in the sacred texts, notably the Bible and the Koran, and in most religions in various forms. Some of the Ten Commandments can be considered as a quasi-universal moral constitution since their principles can be found in all bodies of law: « You shall not kill », « You shall not steal », « You shall not bear false witness».

In a democratic society, the law establishes a rule that citizens have chosen to adopt and respect. In the event of a dispute, the text of the law will decide between the parties involved. The law is prescriptive. A law precisely describes a crime or an offence, i.e. an act, and associates a sanction with it. A citizen can therefore only be judged for a crime or an offence described in a text of law, thus fixed in writing and immutable. A law can only be changed in agreement with the members of the society that has chosen to enact and respect it. In a democracy, the governing bodies are representatives of the people and servants of the state. They are not masters who rule over subjects.

« There are three kinds of government: REPUBLICAN, MONARCHICAL and DESPOTIC. In order to discover their nature, it is sufficient to have the idea that the least educated men have of them. I assume three definitions, or rather three facts: one that republican government is that in which the people as a body, or only a part of the people, have sovereign power; monarchical, that in which one alone governs, but by fixed and established laws; whereas, in despotic, one alone, without law and without rule, carries everything along by his will and by his whims. This is what I call the nature of each government.

(…)

It is not honour that is the principle of despotic States: since all men are equal, no one can prefer himself to others; since all men are slaves, no one can prefer himself to anything.

Moreover, since honour has its own laws and rules, and it should not bent; since it depends on one's own caprice, and not on that of another, it can only be found in States where the constitution is fixed, and which have certain laws.

How could it be suffered by a despot? He prides himself on despising life, and the despot has strength only because he can take it away. How could he suffer the despot? He has consistent rules and sustained whims; the despot has no rules, and his whims destroy all others.

Honour, which is unknown in despotic states, where there is often no word to express it, reigns in monarchies; it gives life to the whole body politic, to the laws and even to the virtues.

(…)

Just as virtue is needed in a republic, and honour in a monarchy, so fear is needed in a despotic government: for virtue it is not necessary, and honour would be dangerous.

(…)

The love of the republic in a democracy is the love of democracy; the love of democracy is the love of equality.

(…)

Men are all equal in republican government; they are equal in despotic government: in the former, it is because they are everything; in the latter, it is because they are nothing.

The closer the government approaches the republic, the more fixed the manner of judging becomes; and it was a vice of the republic of Lacedemonia that the ephors judged arbitrarily, without there being laws to direct them. In Rome, the first consuls judged like the ephors: the disadvantages were felt, and precise laws were made.

In despotic states, there is no law: the judge is his own rule. In monarchical states, there is a law, and where it is precise, the judge follows it; where it is not, he seeks out its spirit. In republican government, it is in the nature of the constitution that judges follow the letter of the law. »

On the Spirit of the Laws - Charles de Secondat de Montesquieu - 1758

The more precise a law is, written in a language that everyone can understand, the clearer it defines the crime and the sanctions that are gradually applied according to the seriousness of the acts, the closer justice comes to the democratic ideal. The more vague a law is, written in a jargon that only a few specialists understand, the more indeterminate the description of the crime and the sanctions that are gradually applied to it according to the seriousness of the facts, the closer justice is dictatorial.

«  Disturbance of the peace of the travelers in railroad : other offences ». The French citizen who received this letter telling him that he is condemned to pay a fine for an offence he did not commit is a victim of Nazi-like dictatorial justice. The offence is not clearly defined by the person who uttered the award. One would hope that it is not a graduate judge! Disturbing the peace of the passengers is not a crime defined by the law, so a child who screams because he has been hurt can be fined for disturbing the peace of the passengers, as well as the one who has a heart attack or gets his feet stuck in his neighbour's bag. Other offences are synonymous with any offence. This means that an RATP officer who is not a law enforcement officer can draw up an officiel report a user for any reason (picking his nose, eating a sandwich, talking politics, talking to his neighbour, giving money to a homeless person, running, laughing, jumping up and down, etc, etc, etc. ) and that a judge can condemn him for this offence which does not exist, which is not recorded by a police officer acting as a law enforcement officer, without giving him the right to defend himself or to appeal. No crime, no graduated sanction, no law text, no procedure and hearing, no right to a lawyer to defend oneself or to appeal. This is a parody of justice that violates criminal law and human rights, and therefore the Constitution of France. It is a dictatorship, a banana republic and a Nazi operation.

The Parakratos, called the Franco-German Defence Council, is terrorist and Nazi in nature. It violates the laws and subjects French citizens to the arbitrariness of the dictatorship.

« Tesmer cleverly sites the Police Administration Act of 1 June 1931, articles 14 and 15 of which provide for temporary detention by the police. As for the ordinance of 28 February 1933, Tesmer argues, after so many others, that the communist peril explicitly mentioned in the preamble refers more broadly to any subversive activity attacking the security of the state, which broadens its scope infinitely. It is not only the declared communists who are targeted, but all those elements who by their behaviour endanger the work of rebuilding the German people in a way that threatens the state and the people. Armed with this broad toolkit, the police can go about their state protection activities and make preventive police detentions, the most effective weapon against the enemies of the state.

(…)

The pleasant fiction of an institution created to ensure the protection of the detainee gives way to the reality of a politico-police measure, i.e. one that is both political and police, which delivers the defenceless individual to the arbitrariness and discretion of the police: « Only those who still dream of a liberal past will consider these measures to be too harsh, even illegal. » These individuals should better reflect on the principles on which the German political community has been based since 1933 and accept that the individual is no longer the centre of all legal and police thinking and practice.

(…)

Prosecutor Tesmer, a member of the NSDAP and the SS, now Dezernatleiter (Head of Department) in the Gestapo, fully assumes that the Schutzhaft complements, or even circumvents, court decisions. It is well known that anti-state enterprises cannot be fought with criminal law provisions alone. The sentence is cryptic, but it suggests what has been happening on a daily basis in Germany since 1933 : the Gestapo is present at the exit of the courtrooms to arrest defendants who have been released or too lightly convicted by the courts.

It also comes to take care of the released prisoner at the exit of the prisons: the police can, in case of necessity, pronounce security measures against a convict who has served his sentence by moving him directly from the prison to the concentration camp. This police detention constitutes a double punishment that is clearly accepted and claimed by jurists and police officers. He who has erred may, by virtue of a biological predisposition, err again.

(…)

Article 42 of the law of 24 November 1933 allows the judge, « if public safety so requires », to increase the sentence of a repeat offender in order to keep him away from the Volksgemeinschaft as long as possible.

(…)

This biologisation of law is also the basis for the Vorbeugungshaft. A decree of 13 November 1933 gave the police the right to arrest as a «professional criminal » anyone considered a potential repeat offender, and therefore likely to strike again, and to take him to concentration camps. In March 1937, Hitler decided on a large-scale raid on the Berufsverbrecher (professional criminals). A year later, in the spring of 1938, the German police targeted, on their order, the « associables » and « strangers to the community of the people » who, because of their vice and laziness, had to be brought back into line by a stay in camp.

(…)

Completing the series of new police weapons, the Sippenhaftung (joint responsibility of the family, the clan) and the sippenhaft (collective detention of the members of a family), increasingly invoked from 1943-1944 onwards, completed the break with the common law of yesteryear as well as the biologisation of the delinquent or criminal.

Himmler specifies the fate of traitors: « I will create an absolute family responsibility (...) You only have to read the Germanic sagas. When (...) family vengeance was exercised, it was consistent, without measure (...) They said : this man has betrayed, his blood is bad, it is traitorous blood, he must be eradicated. And that's how revenge exterminated the whole family, down to the last member. The Stauffenber family will be destroyed to the last member. »

The law of blood - Think and act like a Nazi - Johann Chapouteot -Gallimard 2014

In a democracy, justice (judge - depositary of the law + jury) rules on an act (crime or offence) defined by the law, submits the crime to the adversarial debate of the prosecution and the defence, ensures a fair procedure, applies graduated penalties, fixed by the law according to the facts and the circumstances (mitigating or aggravating) in which the act occurred.

In a dictatorship, there is no judgment for an act committed in violation of a law, but a punishment applied to an individual for an action that varies according to who decides that it is in keeping with his or her conception of human behaviour.

Montesquieu conceptualised it perfectly in 1758: « In despotic states, there is no law: the judge is his own rule ». But when there is no body of law or justice or constitutional police, the judge is not a custodian of the law. He is a « person who has authority over another person by virtue of hierarchical or moral superiority or prestige, or who possesses or attributes to himself a competence ». https://www.cnrtl.fr/definition/juge

Dictatorial punishment, Nazi punishment, is variable geometry. What is a crime in one place may not be in another and vice versa. All decisions are made on the basis of personal conviction and are never subject to adversarial debate. A crime that is not committed is punished, as is the case of a citizen who has to pay a fine for an offence that he has not committed, on the mere presumption that he might commit it. The Nazi political police punish the crime before the person who is going to commit it or not to commit it thinks about it. It is a thought police.

The Assange case is the archetype of Nazi malpractice.

It is a staged fake criminal procedure where no law and no rules of justice are respected. The individual on trial has no birth name. From a legal point of view, therefore, he does not exist. If there is no suspect who has committed a offense or felony under his or her birth name, there is no more crime than offense. The Assange procedure could be defined as follows: The Parakratos City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC against NoName and therefore against nobody. From a legal point of view, from this first observation, we can deduce that there is no Assange case. The Parakratos City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC. is an entity of unknown legal form. It cannot therefore bring a case to court. To bring a case to court, one must be a legal person or an individual with a clearly established name and place of birth. A thing that does not legally exist has therefore brought proceedings against an individual who does not have a name and therefore does not legally exist. The procedure, apparently initiated by the Clinton administration, is about an extradition that has no reason to exist since, according to the story-telling of the Assange blockbuster, the unnamed citizen is Australian and has not committed any crime on American soil. So, for the past ten years, the Assange series has been challenging citizens about a procedure that cannot legally exist. A European arrest warrant would have been issued in the name of a citizen Assange, but as it is not the birth name of the citizen on trial, it has no legal value. Moreover, this warrant had no legal value since the story-telling had preceded it with a preliminary investigation which had cleared the alleged culprit, Mr NoName. As for the charge, it is as fanciful as that of the alleged offence of the French citizen sentenced to pay a fine for an offence that does not exist in French lawt. It falls under « other offences » synonymous with any offence i.e. nothing from a purely legal point of view. The Assange case can be summarised as follows:  A legally shadowy entity sues a nameless man for a crime that is a legal nothing. Nobody sues nobody for anything.

All this might be laughable if it were not one of the methods of instrumentalisation of justice employed by the Nazis to destroy the criminal law and if a man were not sequestered incommunicado and tortured in a Dark Place.

Everything in the Assange case is fake except the human being that WJJA delegates were able to see on a few occasions during the hearings they attended. One of the WJJA doctors wrote three medical reports stating that the man showed signs of torture and was in great pain. Legally, this individual is free. He is therefore being held incommunicado and tortured by thugs who are holding him hostage. It is a crime condoned by the media and the governments of sovereign countries, including sovereign countries that respect the UN Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

The training of men by the Nazis involves decorprisation. The citizen known as Assange has no birth name. He is being abusively held incommunicado and tortured without any media attention. He is not allowed to speak at the hearings, except to says his false name, false first name and false date of birth. He is not allowed visits in prison. He is not allowed any contact. He should be free but nobody is moved, in violation of all international and English laws, that he is being held incommunicado and tortured, no more than Jean-Luc Mélanchon, Jean-Lassale or Eric Dupont Moretti. From a purely social point of view, the life of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange can be summed up in a few photos and videos. The great journalist who is being considered for the Nobel Prize has little to show for it, either from a journalistic point of view or in terms of his private life. In the media, the citizen known as Assange is nothing because no one cares about him. Worse, he is getting married without being present at his wedding, even though he is legally free. This forced marriage (in a Dark Place, it can only be a forced marriage) makes him a « good wife in prison », a typically Nazi term coupled with a call to rape that no media outlet has taken offence to, which a US senator has called him, according to the citizen known as Christine Ann Hawkins. The indescence of story-telling reaches its peak with the Australian programme, devoted to a bride who is not a bride, presenting children whose birth names are unknown since neither their presumed mother nor their presumed father have birth names, strutting around as the happy spouse of a man she claims is suicidal and abused in prison.

« It is not a question of holding a criminal responsible for behaviour that undermines the healthy order of the people. The question is: do I succeed in putting him out of harm's way for our gene pool and our environment. (Lothar Tengel Von Rutkowski) - The individual does not count. The attribution of his act to this or that causality does not count. What is important is the factuality of his offence or crime, which is a potential threat that can always be updated since it has already acted in him. The only interest to be defended here is that of the people in their present and future, their descendants: the biologically dangerous individual must disappear not only from the environment of the people but from their hereditary heritage through measures, henceforth provided for by the law, of intervention on their body. »

The law of blood - Think and act like a Nazi - Johann Chapoutot -Gallimard 2014

The Nazi punitive universe has only one objective, to cleanse the social body (Volk) of harmful elements that impede its « natural' development »: « the biologically dangerous individual must disappear not only from the environment of the people but from their hereditary heritage. » «The individual does not count » because it is only one cell of the social body. In the Nazi punitive universe, the individual does not exist, nor does individuality or free will, nor does the self, the psyche, the conscience or the right to make mistakes. An individual is not punished, neutralised or executed because he has done something wrong, because he has broken a law, but because he is a dangerous parasite. He is not committing a crime. He or she himself is the crime. Assange has not committed a crime. He himself is the crime, that of treason, considered the most serious in Nazi « ideological storytelling ». It is therefore not one citizen who has committed a reprehensible act that is being judged, but the act as such, which has no connection with reality. At the level of theorising and language - there is a typical Nazi verb - the Nazis conceive of crimes only in abstract forms, as do the responses to them : « And that's how revenge exterminated the whole family, down to the last member. The Stauffenber family will be destroyed to the last member. » It is not a citizen who takes revenge on another citizen who has wronged him, but revenge itself - « how revenge exterminated », i.e. the concept of revenge, which acts on its own behalf and solves the problem. The personalisation of the object or concept is one of the foundations of the Nazi verb.

Attalli uses it in his political-existential narratives to assert truths that are not based on any demonstration or real facts : « A new property right will invented himself, giving access, in each new place of residence, to a dwelling of a certain quality and size, detached from a concrete place. » (A brief history of the Future - Jacques Attali - Fayard 2006) According to Jacques Attali, property right invent itself. The concept of property is autonomous in the same way as that of revenge. These language artefacts are the engines of Nazi propaganda and crime annihilators, since a concept cannot commit a crime. By means of a linguistic sleight of hand, the Nazi propagandists make the criminal disappear through a conceptual materialisation that creates an annihilation and the victim through decorporisation, which is logical since there is only one homogeneous social body of which the individual is a cog, or more precisely, a cell, since the Nazi socioligical narrative, like the legal one, is biological. It is not the citizen called Assange who is being judged but the concept of treason, since one can only betray one's sovereign country by intelligence with the enemy. No act of treason, no victim just the concept of treason and the jurisprudence that the Nazis are working hard to put in place to circumvent the extradition law. In his book A Brief History of the Future, Jacques Attali speaks of a of a planetary court will ensure the accounting of jurisprudence drawn up on each continent. The Nazis created repressive measures or administrative norms by decree or ordinance, but neither decrees nor ordinances had the force of law. Nazi legal storytelling is a propaganda tool used to deconstruct the law and create fake jurisprudence, which they implement by resorting to terrorist and manipulative stratagems of psychological warfare.

That is why the Assange hearings are staged and do not respect any of the laws of the UK or the international body of law. Nazi legal storytelling is a propaganda tool used to deconstruct the law. That is why the Assange hearings are staged and do not respect any of the laws of the UK or the international body of law. The Nazi legal storytelling collapses like a house of cards when it is confronted with the arguments of an opposing party. It is for this reason that the individual who incarnates Assange is unapproachable, without consistence of any kind. He must not provoke any compassionate reaction by expressing himself in any way. He is a ghost who is judged by judges who are not judges and defended by lawyers who are not lawyers in rooms that are theaters where a ridiculous legal pantomime is played. Moreover, although no proof of life has been provided since he is sequestered incommunicado and in complete isolation, is being tortured, no media is concerned about his fate. While all the laws are violated, the media makes the headlines about his fake marriage with an intriguing woman without a birth name, a member of the clan of executioners, who publicly exhibits children, without official birth names, as proof of a common life that has no more consistency than the Noname Assange, object of the legal sacrifice. Humiliating, torturing, smearing, dehumanizing, decorporizing the man in the Assange showcase has only one purpose : to make citizens adhere to the Nazi legal fable. However... « No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.» (Covenant on Civil and Political Rights - https://www.ohchr.org/fr/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx) The media is therefore complicit in the crime.

 « 8. - Psychological warfare is the concerted use of various measures and means designed to influence the opinion, feelings, attitude and behaviour of opposing elements (authorities, armies, populations) in such a way as to change them in a direction favourable to the achievement of the objectives of the war. 

Psychological warfare is one of the main forms of cold warfare (warfare conducted without the outbreak of hostilities between regular armed forces of opposing powers); it always accompanies hot warfare (warfare involving the outbreak of hostilities between regular armed forces of opposing powers). 

It aims to annihilate the opposing will to fight and, if possible, to recruit auxiliaries and allies in the opposite camp; it seeks to facilitate and relieve military operations.
All political and military leaders are responsible for it within the framework of their attributions; all citizens contribute to its conduct. 

It inspires or influences all activities: political, diplomatic, military, economic, etc. »

Provisional Instruction on the Use of Psychological Weapons - Ministry of National Defence and the Armed Forces - Personnel of the Armed Forces - 5th Division (29 July 1957)

The Assange affair is a vast propaganda operation aimed at subjecting international populations to the transformations that the Nazi mafia Parakratos, City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC, and the Parakratos, Franco-German Defence Council, are carrying out, i.e. the destruction of fundamental human rights and the principle of fair trial.

The Nazi motto, « Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Fuhrer » is incompatible with the motto of the Lights century and democracy, « Liberty Equality Fraternity ».

Liberty ⇒ Equality ⇒ Fraternity

Freedom is the supreme condition that every citizen must be able to enjoy, but which he or she must also guarantee to others, within democracy society. This freedom consists in being able to be oneself in the midst of others and to act according to one's own free will while respecting the fundamental rights of each individual. This Freedom implies the principle of Equality which ensures that everyone has sacred fundamental rights and identical duties regardless of their origin, sex, age and function. This Equality in turn implies the principle of Fraternity, because for Liberty and Equality to be possible, men must show Fraternity towards his fellow men, that is to say, act with a feeling of solidarity, friendship and disinterested assistance so that mutual protection and cooperation can be established that is beneficial to each and every one. When the axioms Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité are applied within a society, in the form Liberté ⇒ Egalité ⇒ Fraternité, whatever the society, the democratic pact is fulfilled and popular sovereignty is fully expressed. 

For the Nazis, the people, the Volk, is thought of biologically, as a « social body » of which each individual is a cell. This conception leaves no room for freedom and free will, since each human component of this « social body » contributes, according to its place and its role, to its good functioning, its vitality, its power, its vigor. Any human cell of this « social body » is ruthlessly eliminated if it is considered harmful. « The meaning of criminal law changes radically. If, since Beccaria and the French Revolution, punishment aimed at amending and chastising the criminal, since Man is plastic and can evolve, a criminal law based on the almost total determinism of "criminal biology", can only exclude, even eradicate. This is what Falk Ruttke clearly states: « the meaning of criminal law is elimination.» (The law of blood - Think and act like a Nazi - Johann Chapouteot -Gallimard 2014) As for the Reich, it has only one specific object, the territorial conquest : « The thousand-year-old Reich (Empire) thus follows in the almost thousand-year-old footsteps of the colonization by the Teutonic Knights and the Swordsmen. » If we refer to Jacques Attali, this Empire could well become what he calls a Hyper-democracy ans a HyperEmpire :

« Everything points to a transformation of Man into an object, an increase in injustice, precariousness and violence; everything indicates that we are entering a dark pre-war period: the most sophisticated nations reacting to barbarism with barbarism, to fear with egoism, to terror with retaliation. It therefore seems reasonable to resign ourselves to the fact that Man is only a monster and that our world can never become a planetary democracy, tolerant, peaceful, diverse but gathered. Yet such a dynamic is underway : the good after the market and the war. Jupitar after Quirinus and Mars.

(…)

We will then understand that what I call here Hyperdemocracy fits quite naturally into this history of the Future; we will see that many forces are already, underground, establishing its foundations and that it depends only on us, today, that it becomes, in a few decades, the reality of the world.

(…)

Avant-garde actors, whom I will call transhumans, will lead - and are already leading - relational companies where profit will no longer be a constraint, and not an end in itsel.

(…)

Then, even beyond a new global balance between market and democracy, transhumans will bring about a new order of abundance from which the market will gradually be excluded in favour of the relational economy.

(…)

Transhumans will feel themselves to be both citizens of the world and members of several communities; their nationalities will be those of the languages they speak and not just the countries they inhabit.

(…)

There will soon be all sorts of off-ground institutions fulfilling civic, medical, ecological or social missions, NGOs, diplomatic negotiation intermediaries, amateur sports clubs, free meeting places or cooperation. Most of them will be created in the South by people who will empower themselves without expecting anything from anyone.

(…)

The output of relational companies, in market terms, already represents about 10% of world GDP, and their share is growing rapidly. They have already created concepts that negotiate the values of the future : the right to interfere, the right to childhood, the right to dignity. They are also at the origin of most of the recent international institutions: the AIDS Fund, the International Criminal Court, the Global Fund. Thanks to these special kinds of companies, we are beginning to speak of an international community (not to speak a world government), and of the protection of nature (not speak a common property).This is already the beginning of a global democracy that I call Hyperdemocracy.

(…)

Everyone will be a citizen of several entities at the same time and it will become possible to defend one's own identities without wanting to destroy those of one's neighbour. (...) New forms of democratic control will appear based on autonomous rating agencies, permanently monitoring the work of elected representatives, thanks to the techniques of nomadic ubiquity and hyper-surveillance.

(…)

Each continent or sub-continent will bring together the market democracies on it into a Union, as the European Union already does. Each Union will be responsible for the currency, transparency of markets, harmonisation of social conditions, environmental protection, internal security, social protection, health, education, immigration, foreign policy and defence of the common space. It will need have a continental parliament and government.

It will need to have, as is already the case in Europe, a body for resolving conflicts between nations of the same continent. Such a future should become possible in particular in the Middle East, which will one day have to bring together all nations, including Israel and Palestine, in a Regional Union. The European Union, the vanguard of Hyper-Democracy, will become a new kind of nation, probably extending one day until to Turkey and Russia. This is where the conditions for a balance between market and democracy will be best met. It is in Europe that hyper-democracy will be born.

On a global scale, new institutions will be created, have to be created, as an extension of those that already exist. The United Nations will be the basis for this. A Constitution of the Planet will take up and extend the present Charter of the United Nations. It will require it take a supranational and not just a multilateral dimension. Its preamble will include all the rights and duties of every human towards nature, other humans and life; it will include rights not provided for in the current Charter; in particular, it will provided for the new, essential right to a childhood, which will involve a duty of kinship. Other rights and duties will impose the protection of life, nature and diversity, and will set boundaries that cannot be crossed by the market. The UN General Assembly, where more and more states will be present, will be progressively supported by another chamber, where those elected by universal suffrage will each represent an equal number of human beings, and then by a third chamber where the relational market companies will be present. This Planetary Parliament will levy planetary taxes based on the GDP of each country, its arms expenditure and its greenhouse gas emissions The Security Council will merge with the G8 and expand to include some of the eleven including India, Brazil and Indonesia. It will then be composed only of representatives of the Continental Unions. This planetary government will devote far more resources to the protection of humanity than any government on the planet does today. It will dictate social norms, such as the principle of the best global social regime, which it will progressively impose on a global scale on all companies.  It will give itself the means to enforce them. The international financial institutions, such as the World Trade Organisation and the International Labour Organisation, will be placed directly under his guardianship so that they no longer obey only the instructions of the richest countries. This planetary government will have the means to fight against mafias, drug trafficking, sexual exploitation, slavery, climate change and attacks (accidental, terrorist or military) by nano robots and other self-replicating pathogens that could destroy the biomass: a blue jelly (absolute nanotechnological weapon) in the sole hands of the planetary government to fight the grey jelly. A global security assistance force with the best equipment, as mentioned above, will protect the environment and fight against pirates. Gradually, to support this world government, new control, defence and regulation bodies will be set up, based on the governance bodies of the Hyper-Empire and those of relational companies: a planetary court will ensure the accounting of jurisprudence drawn up on each continent and will judge the various pirates; a world water agency will protect its availability; a universal market authority will control monopolies and the respect of the right to work Another body will control the quality of consumer products in particular food. Another will control the major insurance companies, other governing bodies and very large enterprises essential to life; one will have the means to fight the pirate economy and defend intellectual and material property. A Central Bank will ensure the stability of the major currencies and then manage a single currency; it will exclude from the financial community any institution that allows the laundering of drug money. A planetary development bank will finance the major infrastructures of the cities and countries that will respect the Planetary Constitution; it will support the economies that convert their economies dependent on organised crime or drugs and will support them in their fight against pirates. A specific institution will help to structure the relational companies and to verify that they do not have the mask of pirate or terrorist institutions. Another global institution will help in particular to develop micro-finance.

The headquarters of these institutions will obviously not have to be located in the same place - although Jerusalem was mentioned above for some of them.

Their existence can be as nomadic as the HyperEmpire they will be in charge of balancing.

A Brief History of the Future - Jacques Attali - Fayard - 2014

« M.C. McGrath, Julian Assange's « successor » at Wikileaks and companion of Stella Mor/ris aka Sarah Gonzalez Devant/Stella Smith Robertson?

As I watch their shenanigans my eye is drawn to a familiar figure: MC McGrath! The boy with whom Stella Moris had come into the public gallery at Westminster Court on 19 and 20 December 2019, 23 January and 19 February 2020 at a time when there was no question, either near or far, that she was a close associate of Julian Assange .

MC McGrath with her teenage looks resembled a son of Stella Moris, whose appearance at the time differed somewhat from that of today: still very small in stature, about 1.50, her face was thinner, framed by hair in a ponytail. She was not yet wearing the heavy make pu and scarlet reds she wears today. It has to be said that apart from us, the Wikijustice team who were trying to figure out who she is, no one really paid attention to her, and certainly not the press. She was like one of those obscure spectators invited to watch the "Assange" show by who knows who, who having fulfilled their role, immediately faded away. Like Paul.

I identified McGrath in February 2020 as a thirty-something hacker, a former student of Boston University and MIT, posing as an anti-system while being funded by the Thiel Foundation and Palantir and Soros. He is indeed a creator of a sophisticated computer tool claiming to compete with the surveillance tools of the NSA itself. A possible successor to Assange that the system can launch when the time comes.

The Peter Thiel Foundation finances his IT tools while Thiel, as founder of Pay Pal with Facebook investor Elon Musk, is a globalist oligarch far removed from the welfare of people and their freedom ... His counter-terrorism company Palantir Technologies is even at the heart of the global surveillance system by the Anglo-Saxon, French and German BND agencies. while his husband Mark Dazensein is a collaborator of Black Rock, the all too famous financial mafia of the globalist super class. Clearly, Peter Thiel, by funding individuals like M.C. McGrath is funding his own carefully controlled opposition. This is the kind of person who claims to be a successor to Wikileaks and Julian Assange and who is clearly a friend of Stella Morris!

To the Westminster MC. McGrath, a collaborator of Peter Thiel, was sitting next to Stella Morris and talking to no one but her. I saw him again next to her sitting in the back row just outside the glass box where Assange was locked up, from 24-27 February 2020 at Woolwich Court. Neither he nor Stella Morris were talking to Assange at the time, even though they were spending 8 hours a day just a metre away from him and no one was preventing them from turning to the prisoner, as they were sitting on the bench reserved for his lawyers! Strange lawyers indeed, Stella Morris never called to the English Bar and MC McGrath a computer scientist and hacker... That non-lawyers were sitting in the lawyers' seats was enough to make this "trial" very suspicious to us.

On 27 February, during the Assange revolt, MC McGrath was one of those who stood up to surround a talking Julian Assange, gesticulating and cursing at them like a director disappointed with the poor performance of the actors in his show.

MC McGrath stood for a good half hour in front of Assange, staring at him with rapture and admiration as if he had seen a supernatural apparition. Stella Moris tried to talk to him, but Assange did not respond and ignored her completely, all in his angry speech, inaudible to us because the audience gallery was totally isolated by thick glass. Once the microphone was cut off, we couldn't hear what was going on below but we could see almost everything!

I hadn't seen MC McGrath since February 2020 and here he is on 28 October 2021 at the end of the session at the National Justice Museum aka Royal Courts of Justice at 4pm! He is dressed in a black suit with a small beige jumper, black shoes, a black computer type bag, he is also wearing a thick black mask covering his face. He is walking in circles around the gathering in front of the gate of the Royals Courts, he seems to be looking for someone. On the left of the stage, John Shipton is surrounded by journalists to whom he is delivering his speech. Seeing me nearby, as I greet him, he seems nervous and grabs his phone. I notice a silver ring on his right little finger. He is talking to someone with a focused and concerned look, the mask has fallen from his face.

My photos of Mc McGrath done, I focus on the gathering of journalists. There's the girl in the burgundy red coat delivering her speech to her cameraman, she's wearing exactly the same suit and acting exactly the same as she did in front of the Old Bailey in September 2020. The crowd of cameras is dense around Shipton, then I make out Joseph Farell and Fitzgerald all smiling and happy with his work.

Tired, I sit down again under the church wall, under the cross commemorating the struggle and sacrifice of the RAF airmen and their Polish, Czech and French allies. In front of me is parked the "Wikileaks" car and I have a good view of the demonstration on the right. Suddenly I see a group breaking away from the crowd: Stella Morris together her Asian friend with whom she was working in the courtyard, they are talking with Joseph Farell. To their right Nils Lagefoged from the CIJ and a tall blond young man with a grey jumper I don't know.

Farell leaves them, Stella stays with the young man and his collaborator, she is all smiles, relaxed and happy with herself (once her performance as a grieving prisoner's wife is over, she doesn't seem very concerned about Assange's fate...). She chats with one of the technicians of the show in a fluorescent blue waistcoat. Then, to my great surprise, she stands in front of the Volkswagen minibus marked « Free Assange » and stamped with the Wikileaks key.

She poses in front of the minibus in her red jacket and vermillion shoes and black skirt. As she poses, she turns to her Asian colleague, smiles knowingly and points the index finger of her left hand at the "Wikileaks" clepsydra. I catch the knowing look she gives her companion, she resumes her pose while the photo is taken (and I take mine).

It looks like a Victory pose, but it also seems to me that by this gesture she is clearly indicating that "Wikileaks" belongs to her. The clepsydra with the world flowing in an unshakeable hourglass of time... Time and the World, two notions of total power...

The "grieving wife" looks satisfied with the events!

My astonishment increases when I see... MC McGrath joining Stella Morris and her companion!

Here I see them walk past me and around Sankt Clement's church towards Aldwych tube. Stella, her two companions, the blond and the Asian and MC McGrath. The band stops and I see her take off her red heels and exchange them for a pair of white trainers. When her performance is over, she can leave her uncomfortable stage costume. I watch in awe as she leaves the stage, glued to MC McGrath with whom she is chatting. I understand that they are close friends. The further the group moves away under the big plane trees, the more the two boys leave Stella Morris in the care of MC McGrath who accompanies her home after her public performance. He appears to be her true companion.

What « General Sands » will not fail to point out in his vengeful publications is that the Palantir and CIA protégé is the companion of Julian Assange's pseudo-wife (screenshots of Sands)

I've really seen a lot today, though. It's time for me to go. »

Londres en liberté – 29.10-3.11.2021 – La City et autres lieux de pouvoir. A la recherche de Jacques Attali – Liberté pour Julian Assange – Monika Karbowska (monika-karbowska-liberte-pour-julian-assange.ovh)

La lutte pour Julian Assange le 27-28 octobre 2021 – le spectacle, fausses et vraies cours de justice, Stella Morris et MC McGrath – Liberté pour Julian Assange – Monika Karbowska (monika-karbowska-liberte-pour-julian-assange.ovh)

Fin ultime du storytelling Julian Assange ? La liberté à Londres du 25 octobre au 2 novembre 2021. Stella Morris, Tracy Ward et les ducs de Beaufort – Liberté pour Julian Assange – Monika Karbowska (monika-karbowska-liberte-pour-julian-assange.ovh)

About Peter Thiel and Palantir

«Palantir Technologies is a data science and analytics software and services company based in Denver, Colorado.

The company develops and markets two software products dedicated to data fusion, visualization and operational work with data: Palantir Gotham and Palantir Foundry.

Gotham is primarily used by the U.S. intelligence community (NSA, CIA, FBI4, U.S. Marines, U.S. Air Force, and Special Operations), as well as the NYPD and LAPD5 police departments. This software is also used by the intelligence services of a dozen European countries6,7 including France (Direction générale de la Sécurité intérieure8,9).

The NSA uses Palantir software to facilitate the use of XKeyScore (government surveillance software)10.

GCHQ has used Palantir as part of Project Lovely Horse to collect data in the public domain such as tweets, blog information and news articles.10

Palantir has also diversified with Palantir Foundry into the financial, insurance, healthcare (UK NHS11), transportation and consumer goods sectors. It also makes its technology available to NGOs such as the World Food Program12 and Community Solutions »

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palantir_Technologies

https://www.lesechos.fr/idees-debats/sciences-prospective/peter-thiel-et-le-reve-de-lhomme-immortel-1127632

https://foundersfund.com/our_team

https://www.numerama.com/tech/564297-au-fait-pourquoi-palantir-sappelle-palantir.html

https://www.palantir.com/platforms/foundry/

https://www.palantir.com/pt_media/palantir-ceo-alex-karp-defends-his-companys-relationship-with-government-agencies/

And who is going to set up Tracking for Corona Virus with his company Palantir

Peter Thiel, founder of PayPal, Business Angel, in connection with FB, financed by the CIA through its In-Q-Tel fund and French counter-espionage.

We remind you that the MC Mc Grath Society is linked to Palentir through the Thiel Foundation.

Palentir works in collaboration with :

The CIA and Trump

https://www.lemonde.fr/economie/article/2019/11/29/l-americain-palantir-est-toujours-indispensable-aux-espions-francais_6021016_3234.html

Palantir arms the American anti-immigration police since 2014 (Obamah)

In addition to Facebook, Peter Thiel has made numerous investments in start-ups including Slide, LinkedIn, Friendster, Palantir Technologies, and IronPort. Slide, LinkedIn, and IronPort were each founded by Thiel colleagues at PayPal. Fortune magazine reported that PayPal alumni have founded or invested in a dozen start-ups worth, according to Thiel, about $30 billion.

At the end of 2004, Peter Thiel  is Facebook's business angel with an investment of 500,000 dollars. Microsoft recently acquired 1.6% of the company for $240 million, bringing Facebook's value to about $15 billion[5] and Thiel's share to about $1 billion[3].

In September 2006, Thiel announced that it would donate $3.5 million for research against old age through the Methuselah Mouse Prize

Foundation.

http://www.histophilo.com/peter_thiel.php

https://koober.com/it/blog/article/Les-5-idées-à-retenir-du-best-seller-Zero-to-one-de-Peter-Thiel

Thiel's husband, Matt Dazensein, worked for Black Rock.

The citizen known as Stella, Sara, Morris, Morriz, Smith, Gonzales Devant being in close connection with MC Grath, himself in connection with Palantir, the CIA and the DGSI, it is legitimate to think that, she herself, is in close connection with the CIA and therefore with those who, according to the story-telling, wish to kill her, sequester her secretly and torture the one she claims to have married. She has proven links to the CIA through her mentor at the Jane Sauvé Foundation, Stephen Saideman (About Stella Morriz aka https://youtu.be/qMSTCNDaiXI). The wife of a hostage sequestered in secret in a Dark Place and tortured does not meet his torturers and does not work for his torturers. 

At this stage of the investigations, many forces of unknown legal form can be identified and defined since word War II.

• The Parakratos City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC

The Parakratos City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC defined in complaint 1 of the Human Rights Association, WJJA (Attached). This Parakratos is an entity of unknown legal form. As it is not legally a sovereign country, it cannot sign treaties, sit in the UN or lead a sovereign country. To date, the presence of this Parakratos at the command of the territories that make up the North American continent means that the United States of America does not legally exist as a sovereign country. It cannot sit in the UN, sign treaties, or pass international laws. It is this Parakratos City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC that create and runs agencies such as the CIA, which in fact are entities of unknown legal form that employ mercenaries who therefore commit crimes and terrotist attacks. This Parakratos also runs the Federal Reserve and the Pentagon. As the North American Continent is not a sovereign state as it is ruled by the Mountbatten Windsor Brotherhood via the Navigation Act, all actions taken from the North American Continent are illegal and fall under international criminal law.

See complaint 1 WJJA

http://monika-karbowska-liberte-pour-julian-assange.ovh/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Plainte-Wikijustice-pour-Julian-Assange.pdf

Based on the evidence, it appears more than likely that there was collusion between Parakratos City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC and the Nazi government of Adolf Hitler. Pierre Bénouville seems to be one of the elements acting for both the Parakratos City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC, the Nazi socialist national regime and the French Parakratos led by members of the terrorist organisation la Cagoule.

• The French Parakratos : Cagoule - The Mitterrand Gang - The Franco-German Defense Council

The French Parakratos led by the members of the terrorist organisation la Cagoule, to which belonged, or belong, Pierre Bénouville, Eugène Shueller, François Dalle, Jacques Corrèze, François Méténier, all friends of François Mitterrand, who was decorated with the Francisque and who has collaborated with the Nazi regime, since he had been stationed with Maréchal Pétain. This Parakratos committed a first coup d'état after the Armistice by scheming and threatening the members of the Lebrun government to force them to vote full powers to Pétain so that he could abrogate the Constitution of France, thus destroying the sovereign French state.

« Laval negotiates.

The parliamentarians that I will gather here in less than a week are, themselves, influenced and I will get the vote to repeal 1875. Democracy will have lived. The government I will form will be composed of ministers who are committed to our world view, and my authority will be exercised without restriction.

(…)

I will see Doriot to create a tense atmosphere in the city. By confronting the parliamentarians with the dangers of a military coup d'état, with the reactions of public opinion which is, in its active part, very hostile to the assemblies, we will surely win the vote.

(…)

All the capitulards, all the fascists, all the traitors appointed by Goebbels howl at the top of their voices that it was the French wolves who attacked the Hitler lamb.

(…)

Laval's double game

Laval tried to appear, in the eyes of naive or complicit parliamentarians, as the last bastion of freedom. However, he multiplies in the administration of the country measures of authority: forbidden newspapers, merciless censorship are the distinctive signs of the new order which is still camouflaged under the sign of the Republic.

(…)

Abetz, who is back from Berlin, declares :

The furher wants, in a few days, or in a few weeks to propose peace to England. Our conditions will be : THAT LONDON LEAVES US MASTER TO LEAD THE DESTINIES OF EUROPE AND THAT THE FREEDOM OF THE SEAS IS GUARANTEED TO US; IN RETURN, WE WILL NOT DISCUSS WITH GREAT BRITAIN ITS EMPIRE.

The Treason Notebooks - Backstage of Vichy by a witness - Paris - Librairie des Sciences et des Arts - 1945

Since the Pompidou government, it is very likely that all French governments have been Parakratos, secretly directed by members of the Cagoule, notably by Pierre Bénouville.

In view of the facts, the Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to determine if Pierre Bénouville was the occult president of France since World War II until his death and if so to determine who replaced him after his death. In her book of interviews, Before the Night Comes, Laure Adler says that she meets Pierre Bénouville every week at the Elysée Palace : « I ran into him every weekend for months at the very end of the 1980s. I called him the Friday visitor. I soon learned that his punctuality was matched only by the regularity of his meetings with François Mitterrand who - whether by chance or simple coincidence, role-playing or a desire for alliances, no one will ever know - made an appointment for us to meet on the same day at the same time on the second floor of the Palais de l'Elysée where I was working at the time, in front of the painting. » What does a man from the private sector, a member of the terrorist and collaborationist organization, The Cagoule, linked to Allen Dulles, the OSS, now the CIA, MI6 and Z, Marcel Dassault's eminence grise, so directly linked to security, defense and arms dealers, do every week, in the office of a French president? Before him, another member of the Cagoule, involved in the Vichy government, François Méténier, used François Mitterrand's offices when he was minister of France, as if they had been his own. The French vote for citizens who defend programs, not for « agents dealing », a role that Pierre Bénouville and François Méténier seem to play with François Mitterrand.

In view of the links of François Méténier and Pierre Bénouville with a foreign power, the entity of unknown form « City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC », it is therefore legitimate to consider that François Mitterrand also works for this entity of unknown legal form. During his two terms of office, François Mitterrand therefore violated Article 411-4 of the Criminal Code by maintaining « intelligence with a foreign power, with a foreign or foreign-controlled enterprise or organization, or with their agents, with a view to provoking hostilities or acts of aggression against France. » like he did during the 1939-1945 war by putting himself at the service of Marshal Pétain and the Vichy government, Vichy government which was itself under the orders of the terrorist organization The Cagoule, of which Pierre Bénouville and François Méténier were members. It thus seems legitimate to deduce that François Mitterrand, in collusion with Pierre Bénouville, thus with the Parakratos « City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC », led a subversive war against the institutions of France and the French people. This means that the subversive war waged by the Macron government against the Institutions of France and the French people is merely a continuation of the tactics of deploying the subversive war initiated by the terrorist Organization The Cagoule, within the Vichy government. (See WJJA Information Circular for Civil servants and Citizens)

In view of the facts, the Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to determine whether Pierre Bénouville, François Mitterrand, François Méténier and the teams of the Mitterrand clan have « maintained intelligence with a foreign power, with a foreign or foreign-controlled enterprise or organization, or with their agents, with a view to stirring up hostilities or acts of aggression against France », with which entities, of what legal nature, they maintened intelligence, affiliated with which countries and since how long time.

In view of the facts, the Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to determine whether Pierre Bénouville was the leader of the terrorist organizationThe Cagoule or any other terrorist organization and determine the birth identity of the person who took his place at the head of this terrorist organization.

In view of the facts, the Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to determine whether Pierre Bénouville obstructed justice in the proceedings for war crimes and crimes against humanity against the Nazi Klaus Barbie in collusion with Charles Hernu, François Mitterrand and other French state officials.

In view of the facts, the Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to determine whether CIA Director William Casey or other directors of agencies such as MI6, BND, etc., have obstructed in the proceedings for war crimes and crimes against humanity against the Nazi Klaus Barbie, in collusion with Pierre Bénouville, Charles Hernu, François Mitterrand and other French state officials.

In view of the facts, the Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to determine if Pierre Bénouville is involved in the assassination of Jean Moulin in collusion with Klaus Barbie, Karl Boemelburg and other agents working for the Nazis, the OSS, MI6, Z, La Cagoule, etc.

The latest name of the French Parakratos: Conseil de Défense Franco-Allemand

« Isolation, silence, corruption, a false idea of religious duty that deceives and intimidates the conscience, these are the means used by tyrants to keep people under their subjection. They also use brutal force, surrounding themselves with satellites who watch over their defence, carry out their commands, and spread the terror that prevents insurrection, or quell it with blood.

On Voluntary Servitude - Estienne de la Boetie - 1548

On the treason and crimes against the Nation committed by the Macron and Merkel governments

On the treason

Article 411-2

Modifié par Ordonnance n°2000-916 du 19 septembre 2000 - art. 3 (V) JORF 22 septembre 2000 en vigueur le 1er janvier 2002

The act of handing over to a foreign power, a foreign or foreign-controlled organisation or their agents either troops belonging to the French armed forces or all or part of the national territory is punishable by life imprisonment and a fine of 750,000 euros.

Article 411-3

Modifié par Ordonnance n°2000-916 du 19 septembre 2000 - art. 3 (V) JORF 22 septembre 2000 en vigueur le 1er janvier 2002

The act of delivering to a foreign power, a foreign or foreign-controlled company or organisation or their agents materials, constructions, equipment, installations or appliances assigned to national defence is punishable by thirty years' imprisonment and a fine of 450,000 euros.

Crimes and Offences against the Nation

(https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/id/LEGISCTA000006149841/)

Article 411-4

Modifié par Ordonnance n°2000-916 du 19 septembre 2000 - art. 3 (V) JORF 22 septembre 2000 en vigueur le 1er janvier 2002

« The fact of maintaining intelligence with a foreign power, with a foreign or foreign-controlled enterprise or organisation or with their agents, with a view to instigating hostilities or acts of aggression against France, is punishable by thirty years' imprisonment and a fine of 450,000 euros.

Providing a foreign power, a foreign or foreign-controlled enterprise or organisation or their agents with the means to undertake hostilities or carry out acts of aggression against France is punishable by the same penalties. »

Prior to the implementation of the unconstitutional COVID measures, the Macron government has previously betrayed the French people by depriving them of their national independence, dispossessing them of their sovereignty, undermining the integrity of their territory and their institutions, when it violated Article 5 of the Constitution of 4 October 1958, « The President of the Republic is the guarantor of National Independence, Territorial Integrity and Respect for Treaties », by delegating the governance of France to an entity of unknown legal form, non-sovereign, called « Franco-German Council of Ministers » or (and) « Franco-German Defence and Security Council » after the signing of the Treaty of Aachen on 22 January 2019.

Parakratos : Serial murder as a rule of governance

Like the mafia, the Parakratos get rid of troublemakers, opponents or traitors by summarily executing them or by interning them in secret in Dark Places. We remind that the Terrorist Organization la Cagoule is the first to have implanted Dark Places in France. The list of crimes below is not exhaustive. It will be completed as the investigations progress.

In view of the facts, the Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to identify the masterminds and perpetrators of these crimes, their names and places of birth and whether they acted at the behest of an entity of unknown legal form (MI6, Z, Bank, Cagoule, etc…) or for a Parakratos.

Laetitia Toureaux Case

However, the Cagoule killers murdered Latitia Toureaux (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lætitia_Toureaux) in the metro on 16 May 1937, four months after murdering Dimitri Navachine. Between 1936 and 1937, the members of the Cagoule were involved in numerous crimes. Léon Jean-Baptiste, in October 1936, and Maurice Juif, on 8 February 1937, eliminated by Darnand's men for treason. More of them are stabbed with knives, which is one of the most common weapons used by the Cagoule.

About Laetitia Toureaux, Laetissia Nourrissa,

http://www.paris-unplugged.fr/1937-porte-de-charenton-lenigme-du-meurtre-de-laetitia-toureaux/

https://www.pariszigzag.fr/secret/histoire-insolite-paris/enigme-meurtre-metro-porte-de-charenton

https://cultea.fr/laffaire-laetitia-toureaux-le-premier-crime-parfait-du-metro-parisien.html

« Laetitia Toureaux belonged to the Cagoule and was the mistress of Gabriel Jeantet. He had entrusted her with many secrets.

"To her misfortune, Laetitia was talkative. The bonnet did not forgive her for her relations with the 2nd Bureau. She was tried and sentenced to death like other thieving and talkative hoods. It was Filliol who was in charge of her execution. »

The whole truth about the Cagoule affair, its treason, its crimes, its men - Joseph Désert (Librairie des Sciences et des Arts - 1946)

We recall that Gabriel Jeantet was one of Mitterrand's godfather for the Francisque. François Mitterrand and, consequently, Pierre Bénouville, have direct links, close links, with the murderers of Dimitri Navachine, Laetitia Toureaux and the Rosselli’s brothers : Jean Filiol and Jean-Marie Bouvier, aka Jean Bouvyer. François Mitterrand knew Gabriel Jeantet, the lover of the victim, Laetitia Toureaux, and therefore probably also the victim. François Mitterrand therefore knows the victim and his two murderers.

Jean Filliol, Pierre Bénouville and Jean-Marie Bouvier, aka... are all members of the terrorist organisation « The Cagoule ». François Mitterrand is officially not a member of the Cagoule even if many of his friends are members, but he worked for Marshal Pétain and the Vichy government during the war. François Mitterrand did nothing to ensure that justice was done to Laetitia Toureaux. Neither did Pierre Bénouville. François Mitterrand even came to the aid of Jean-Marie Bouvier when he was imprisoned.

« Jean Filliol and Eugène Deloncle, understanding the danger resulting from the assassination of the Rosselli brothers, decided to put the movement in order. They advised Bouvier to leave France without delay. As he had not yet done his national service, the young man took the opportunity to answer the call: he was immediately assigned to the platoon of officer cadets in a regiment of African chasseurs in Constantine, Algeria. In 1937, almost all the protagonists of the Cagoule were arrested, with the exception of Bouvier. His weakness of character go to lose him. Drunk or out of bravado, he ventured to confide in some of his regimental comrades. Quickly arrested, François Mitterrand's childhood friend was repatriated to France between two gendarmes and appeared before Judge Béreille, to whom he confessed quite spontaneously to all the events in which he had participated without fully measuring the consequences of his statements. On the one hand, he risks death, because OSARN is not soft on traitors and talkers. It is said that even at that time, snitches or members in charge of arms procurement or fund transport who had taken large sums from the organisation's coffers were simply executed. Thus, Léon Jean-Baptiste, in October 1936, and Maurice Juif, on 8 February 1937, eliminated by Darnand's men for treason. The threat hanging over Bouvyer is therefore very real, especially as his testimony directly accuses the men of the steering committee, the young Charentais being careful to minimise his own role.

Informed of her son's imprisonment, Antoinette Bouvier warned François Mitterrand who, in his dual capacity as a law student and member of the French Social Party, seemed the most likely to find a solution. François Mitterrand, as he would do throughout his life, answered the call without hesitation. In a few days, he managed to find the right man and convince him to defend his friend. The man is one of the leading figures of the Paris bar, also a companion from the early days of Colonel de la Roque : he is Xavier Vallat. A renowned lawyer and member of the Croix de Feu until their dissolution, this war invalid (he lost a leg in combat) is viscerally anti-Semitic and anti-Freemason.

(…)

François Mitterrand's choice was not innocent: he knew Vallat's convictions, which he had seen and no doubt had the opportunity to meet at the national volunteers. He could not ignore his militant anti-Semitism, which was shared by many members of or close to the Cagoule. Vallat also intervened on behalf of an accomplice of the murderers of the Rosselli brothers, in the face of prestigious colleagues from the Paris bar, such as Mr Moro-Giaferri, the lawyer for Carlo Rosselli's widow.

Appointed commissioner for Jewish issues, Xavier Vallat hired Jean Bouvyer, in 1941, still charged with complicity in the murder of the Rosselli brothers. He made him a contractual redactor. The Commissariat aux Questions Juives (CGQJ) was in charge of all antisemitic activities of the French state, based on instructions given by the Vichy administration. But the CGQJ also follows up on the letters of denunciation sent to it, which some historians believe numbered between three and five million. They sometimes passed through the Institute for Jewish Studies, directed by the indigent Captain Paul Sézille, which had a police section, the SEC (Section d'Enquête et de Contrôle), specialised in investigations against the Jewish community. As for Bouvyer, who was installed in the building on Place des Petits-Pères, which had been looted from the Léopold Louis-Dreyfus bank, he centralised the correspondence received and transmitted it to the various departments of the police station. He carried out this task for two years: « for example, every day on average, a letter was sent by him to the Jewish Affairs Police and then to the Investigation and Control Section ».

Under the direction of Joseph Antignac, who, in fact, headed the CGQJ from 1943 onwards, the exploitation of letters of denunciation became systematic. According to Laurent Joly, the investigation and control section proceeded with « the arrest of nearly nine hundred people, more than half of them following denunciations ». We know that of the eight hundred and fifty to nine hundred people arrested, more than six hundred and fifty were deported… It was during these years that Jean Bouvier became the companion of Marie-Josèphe Mitterrand, one of the sisters of François Mitterrand.

In 1944, Bouvier prudently left France to escape the purge and took refuge in South America, where he was hired by a subsidiary of L'Oréal. He would later avoid meeting his childhood friend, so as not to interfere with his political career. But in 1946, when his son Jean-Christophe was born, François Mitterrand appointed the faithful Antoinette Bouvier, aka Bouvier, as his godmother.

François Mitterrand enters Francisque Cagoule - François Gerber - L’Archipel 2006

A section of the French police force draws the attention of the executive and the legislature to the unconstitutionality of the Joxe-Valls decree on the code of ethics of the police force, and therefore to its illegality. The parliament is not taking any steps to oppose this illegal, dictatorial measure and to condemn the criminals (violating the constitution is a crime). It is clear that the Hollande government, which could be called the Parakratos Hollande, is acting as a subversive force against France and the French state.

In view of the facts, the Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to determine whether Parakratos Hollande acted in collusion with Parakratos City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC or any other entity acting in collusion with him, mI6, CIA, WHO, etc. and to determine whether there was intelligence with a foreign power contrary to France's interests.

In view of the facts, the Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to determine whether Pierre Bénouville, a member of the Cagoule, an agent of MI6 and Z, acted as a shadow president during François Hollande's mandate.

In view of the facts, the Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to determine which members, dead or alive, of the successive governments of France, work, have worked, since the Vichy Government, for the Parakratos City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC or for any other entity of unknown legal form working under its orders. Investigations must be made of all Presidents of the Republic, all members of the government, all state officials, all parliamentarians in order to determine who might be a member of the Cagoule (Or a member of any other organisation with a different name but acting, like it, behind the scenes of Power. - Pierre Bénouville managed Dassault and the French executive-legislature until his death in 2001 - who replaced him?), among others : Georges Pompidou,  Valéry Giscard d’Estaing, François Mitterrand,  Jacques Chirac, François Hollande, Nicolas Sarkozy,  Emmanuel Macron, all the ministers, all the deputies, all the senators and all the unofficial ones like Pierre Bénouville, Pierre Berger, Bernard Henri Lévy, Régis Debray, the Mitterand clan, of which Robert Mitterrand, Jacques Mitterrand, Christophe Mitterrand, Gilbert Mitterrand,  Mazarine Pingeot, Brigitte Macron, aka Brigitte Trogneux, Christophe Deloire, those whom Jean Edern Hallier refers to as the Solutré Gang : « Thus, his loyalty to the years of collaboration came full circle with the pilgrimage where his disciples accompanied him on his ascent since the « big charnel ground ». Behind Mitterrand, Roland Dumas, the shadow, Badinter, the yellowish sycophant and his sub-human Keijman, Charasse, the coprophagus, Lang, the pedocrat, Bergé, « the mother pimp », Fabius, the contaminated vampire, Hanin, the dirty Navarro on dirty cops, Joxe, the controller of dirty work, Rousselet, the hard cash caddy, Hernu the comic trouper, Beregovoy, the good proletarian and Attali, the relic dealer. They're thirteen to the dozen to make bonus, the Solutré gang. » (Non-exhaustive list)

In view of the facts, the Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to determine which chiefs or members, dead or alive, trade unions and political parties, French and other sovereign countries work, have worked, since the Vichy Government, for the Parakratos City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC or for any other entity of unknown legal form working under its orders. (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catégorie:Syndicaliste_français_par_syndicat) No union or trade union leader, no party or political party leader has informed French citizens of the unconstitutional nature, and therefore contrary to the interests of France, of the measures taken by successive governments of France since Vichy. Only a part of the French police informed the executive and the legislature of these repeated violations of constitutional laws when they denounced the Joxe-Valls decree. Marine Lepen, Jean-Marie Lepen, Jean-Luc Mélanchon, Olivier Besancenot, François Asselineau, Jean Lassale, Laurent Munerot, Dominique Métayer, Laurent Berger, Philippe Martinez, Yves Veyrier, François Hommeril, Philippe de Villiers, etc have not informed the French people about the repeated violations of the constitution by the successive governments of France, nor about the Petainist-Nazi drift of this different governments (Violation of all the fundamental liberties guaranteed by the constitution, inalienable, unalterable, imprescriptible). None of these trade union leaders, none of these politicians, none of the mayors of France, have informed the French people of the mafia-like and illegal nature of French different governments. None of these union leaders, none of these politicians, none of the mayors of France, have informed the French people of the illegality of all the French elections organized in a country that no longer has a Constitution since it has been violated by those who have the duty to respect it and are in charge of enforcing it. However, all these citizens, all these parties, all these civil servants are the guarantors of the constitutional values of France and in charge of enforcing them.It is legitimate that the French people understand why their representatives, guarantors of the Constitution and democratic laws, have failed in their mission and abandoned the French institutions in the hands of subversive and mafia forces. It is legitimate for the French people to know if there was intelligence of those who represent them with a foreign power or with a Parakratos of the type Parkratos City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC or with entities of unknown legal form such as MI6, Z, CIA, OMS. It is legitimate that the French people know if those who represent them have betrayed the Constitution and the democratic values of France: FREEDOM - EQUALITY - FRATERNITY. It is legitimate that the sovereign peoples know if they have been the victims of the successive French Parakratos, the last of which is called the Franco-German Defense Council. It is legitimate that the French people know if among those who represent them there are citizens originating or paid by a foreign power.

In view of the facts, the Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to determine if the citizens Régis Debray and Bernard Henri Levy, or others French citizen, have contributed, at the orders of various illegal and mafia-like French Parakratos, to subversive destabilization in sovereign countries. « And then, there are intellectuals at the Elysée, Debray the donor of the Che, the retiree of the Cordilleras of the Andes, or Attali, sniffer of the historians of 3rd order, Manceron and writers of 4th in the concentric circles. In cold blood, Régis Tasbide,  Gallo, Guimard, Jouffroy, Pingaud, the others just have to shut up. This is an improvement over the famous organic intellectuals with a Marxist state apparatus as their rack, but who at least were linked to the ideology: they are the president's privates, his cops and his watchdogs. They bark: the intellectuals are us. They are all plagiarists, frustrated, forgers. (…) I pinned them down hard one after the other. Present, by chance in Canada, I warned the AFP correspondent that Debray, who had come to give a lecture, would not fail to say something stupid, which inevitably happened. Then, I gave Attali the weapon of his crime, which he used himself - Ernst Jünger's Hourglass Treaty - which he plagiarized in a touching way in his history of time, which allowed me to unmask him. If I come back to this affair, it is because it illustrates the ideology of confiscation, pickpocketing - of privatisation for the benefit of every man for himself - and the intellectual swindle in which the regime has installed itself at the highest level (…).» Let us recall that Régis Debray was in Chile at the time of Pinochet's coup d’état. Let us remember that Régis Debray is looking for Barbie in Bolivia

.

In view of the facts, the Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to determine if the citizen Régis Debray is involved in the death of Che Guevarra and the coup d'état of Augusto Pinochet and to determine if he works for an entity of unknown legal form such as Z, MI6, CIA, etc. (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Régis_Debray)

In view of the facts, the Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to determine if Bernard Henri Levy was working for a foreign power whose interests in this conflict were contrary to the sovereign interests of France during the war in Yugoslavia. Indeed, during this period, French diplomacy, with Alain Juppé at the helm, sought to safeguard Yugoslavia and tried to set up a negotiation with the Serbs and the Russians to end the war.. Organ trafficking was carried out on Serbian prisoners. (https://www.courrierdesbalkans.fr/+-trafic-organes-uck-+?debut_derniersarticles=8#pagination_derniersarticles) Consequently, the Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to determine which entities of unknown legal form, which Parakratos are involved in this war, trafficking and crimes against humanity and whether Bernard Henri Levy was working for one of them in this area. In February 2011, at the time of the anti-Mouammar Kadhafi uprising in Benghazi, Libya, Bernard Henri Levy went to the country and arranged for the French government to legitimise the Benghazi Committee as Libya's legal representative. Sarkozy then recognises this puppet government and sends French army to reinforce the American aircraft carriers that landed in Libya. The operation led to the summary execution of Kadhafi.

In view of the facts, the Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to determine if Bernard Henri lévy is not a secret ambassador of the Parkratos City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC which harms the sovereign interests of France.

In view of the facts, the Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to determine the circumstances of Mouammar Kadhafi's execution and to identify the entities of unknown legal form responsible for his execution.

n view of the facts, the Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to determine whether Nicolas Sarkozi works for the Parkratos City of London Corporation - Virginia Corporation - Washington DC or any other entity of unknown legal form and what is its involvement in the execution of Mouammar Kadhafi.

The Association for the Defense of Human Rights, WJJA, requests the judicial authorities of sovereign countries respectful of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter to open an investigation to determine whether Mouammar Kadhafi financed Nicolas Sakozy's campaign (https://www.asso-sherpa.org/financement-campagne-sarkozy-libye).

https://www.francetvinfo.fr/politique/affaire/financement-de-la-campagne-de-sarkozy/financement-libyen-cette-enquete-dans-l-enquete-ne-fait-que-commencer-estime-fabrice-arfi-apres-la-mise-en-examen-de-mimi-marchand_4652157.html

https://www.lesechos.fr/2016/06/financement-libyen-le-document-entre-sarkozy-et-kadhafi-est-authentique-selon-la-justice-francaise-207552

https://libnanews.com/un-juge-libanais-du-haut-conseil-de-la-magistrature-accuse-de-corruption-dans-le-cadre-de-laffaire-sarkozy-kadhafi/

In December 2013, the Maidan operation was mounted to destabilise Russia in Ukraine. The demonstrations were allegedly paid for by US foundations, the Nazis of Pravy Sektor and the Svoboda Party, which is leading the campaign against President Yanukovych. BHL then went to Kiev several times. He appeared alongside Nazis brandishing their flags, which made him perfectly identifiable. On 2 May, it was the Odessa massacre, the ATO punitive expedition against the Donbass.

Le Massacre d’Odessa porte en lui les germes de la guerre en Ukraine – Du droit des peuples à disposer d'eux-mêmes (wordpress.com)

The Odessa Massacre bears the seeds of war in Ukraine – Du droit des peuples à disposer d'eux-mêmes (wordpress.com)

Les nazis ukrainiens crèvent l’écran d’une Europe Otanisée – Du droit des peuples à disposer d'eux-mêmes (wordpress.com)

Ukranian Nazis burst the screen of NATOmized Europe – Du droit des peuples à disposer d'eux-mêmes (wordpress.com)

De Donetsk à Boutcha et Kramatorsk : revue des crimes de guerre dénoncés en Ukraine – Du droit des peuples à disposer d'eux-mêmes (wordpress.com)

« On a Banderist website, one could still read in 2015 his conception of « social-nationalist » ideology, signed with his name: Андрій Білецький.

Very useful for students reviewing their courses on Nazi Germany, his breviary is translated at the end of the article. For now, a few exergues should be enough (emphasis added):

« The main mystical idea of social nationalism is to create, instead of a group of disparate individuals united mechanically by the name « Ukrainian » inscribed on their passports, the National Supercommunity – a single biological organism composed of new people – by their physical, and intellectual and spiritual development. From the mass of individuals must emerge the Nation, and from the weak modern man – the Supreme-human [in German, « Übermensch« ]. »

His principal « triad« : « Socialism, Racism, Total Sovereignty » ..

« If Ukraine is an earthly paradise, it is only because our Race has made it a paradise. Therefore, the treatment of our national organism must begin with the racial purification of the nation. And then a healthy national Spirit will be reborn in a healthy racial body, and with it the culture, the language and everything else.

« Thus, social-nationalism raises on its shield all the ancient Ukrainian Aryan values, forgotten in modern society.

« The task of the present generation is to create the Third Empire [in German, « Third Reich »] – the Great Ukraine. And this question, curiously, is not so much political as biological.”

A person who writes such a plagiarised ideology is a Nazi, strictly speaking.

The first task that the Ukraine Euromaidan entrusted to this excellent student of Adolph Hitler, was to lead in eastern Ukraine, located on the edge of Russia, the militiamen of Praviy Sektor, sweetly nicknamed the « men in black », from March 12, 2014. Knowing that Praviy Sektor brings together paramilitary factions bearing ideologies related to that of Biletsky, that he will be in charge of, in particular, Luhansk and Donetsk, while being integrated into the staff of the Ministry of the Interior, we can say that the repression of opponents to maïdan government or “Junta“ (called anti-maidan, then « pro-Russian », then « separatists », and finally « terrorists », if not sub-humans) is placed in expert hands. »

https://dudroitdespeuplesadisposerdeuxmemes.wordpress.com/2022/04/19/ukranian-nazis-burst-the-screen-of-natomized-europe/

About Xavier Joseph Vallat

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xavier_Vallat

https://www.cairn.info/revue-revue-d-histoire-de-la-shoah1-2001-3-page-9.htm

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00104652

http://www.ajpn.org/personne-Xavier-Vallat-5833.html

Dimitri Navachine, aka Navatchine, aka Navashine

Dmitri Navashin is a Russian journalist and economist with links to the USSR. He is vice-chairman of the Central Committee of the Red Cross for prisoners of war. He was a member of the economic study bureau of the Bank for Trade and Industry of Moscow in 1924. He was director of the Commercial Bank for Northern Europe from 1925 to 1930. He was a friend of the minister Anatole de Monzie, who had the USSR recognised by France. He negotiated the repayment of the Russian loan.

On 23 January 1937, he was assassinated with six truncated bayonet shots, including one in the heart, by Jean Filiol, of the Cagoule, on Avenue du Parc-des-Princes, between the Bois de Boulogne, from which he was returning as usual at 10.30 a.m., and his home, 28 rue Michel-Ange.

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimitri_Navachine

https://www.gettyimages.ca/detail/news-photo/le-discours-de-charles-spinasse-à-lenterrement-de-dimitri-news-photo/1357466084?language=fr

Navachine is the friend of Gaston Bergery (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaston_Bergery), a not very recommendable collaborator who married Loubia Krassine in her second marriage, who is said to be the daughter of Leonid Borissovitch Krassine (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonid_Krassine), Lenin's right-hand man. Their son Jean-François Bergery is Cocteau's godson. In her second marriage, Loubia Krassine married Etienne Astier de la Vigerie.

(https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmanuel_d%27Astier_de_La_Vigerie).

Together they have two sons, Christophe and Jérôme.

« Meanwhile, Navachine also had generated ennemies in France. In The 193o, he accepted e great deal of consulting work with powerful multinational firms, such as the American Matford automobile company. He attended conferences and wrote books of the Depression, in the process becoming an increasingly prominent figure in French political circle, especially among the socialists. Considered a mathematical genius by many, he offered advice on credit manipulation, state financial planning, and the recycling of old debts. His brand of socialism, however, was closer to that of the Popular Front than that Stalin. In France, Navachine helped to organize a circle of like-minded moderate industrialits, intellecttuals, and policians who were dedicated to exploring ways in wich France could escape from the worldwide economic crisis. The group, known as "X-Crise", became the bête-noire of left-wing conspiracy theorists in the 1930s and 1940s, such as Marcel Déat, editor of the newspare l'Oeuvre. Déat and his followers insisted that X-Crise was merely a front for the much more sinister Synarchie or Mouvement Synarchique d'Empire, a sort of clandestine organization they were convinced souht to dominate France through a secret corporate technocracy that woul eventually overthrow the republic. This conspiracy theory, like those associated with Jews and The protocols of Zion, derived from forged documents and overwrought imaginations. Those who fought the Synarchie in France evinced a profoubd fear of rapid and morally disruptive modernization and the all-encompassing, dehumanizing capitalist society they believed resulted from it. Collaborating with X-Crise brought Navachine into contact with the group fonder, Jean Coutrot, and other controversial figures associated with right-wing politics at the Banque Worms, such as future Vichy collaborattors Gabriel Leroy-Ladurie, Pierre Pucheu, and Hippolyte Worms. Navachine moves in multiple but often opposing political circles, and thus there were probably many people from a variety of hostile camps withs cause to want him eliminated.

(…)

Thus, in January 1937, Navachine was an influential man with enemies from his homeland, but no more or fewer than many others Russian exiles in France. Seemingly unconcerned about a possible attempt on his life, he kept a busy schedule of seminars, consulations, and publishing. A middle-aged, professorial fellow of regular habits who lived a respectable upper-class life style in a fashionable neighborhood near the Bois de Boulogne, hi high public profile meant that he was a difficult target for assassination despite the many political enemies he had accrued. Given that in the 1930 Paris was home to at least twenty thousand Russian exiles, many of them actively plotting to overthrow the soviet government, the city seemed to be crawling with easier prey.

Murder in the metro - Laetitia Toureaux and the Cagoule in 1930S in France - Gayle K. Brunelle and Annette Finley-Croswhite - Louisiana University Press - 2010

« Was Bénouville the leader of the Cagoule?

(…)

The man behind the « arrest of Caluire », and therefore of Jean Moulin, was not in the Dugoujon house, but in the city of Lyon. Pierre Bénouville was very well received in Vichy. The car that drove him here and there bore the badge issued by Philippe Pétain's government to facilitate passage to Switzerland, among other places, for the Germans.

Pierre Bénouville joined the Resistance in November 1942, when the bad wind was beginning to blow against the Germans. This did not prevent him from writing in the anti-Semitic newspaper « L’Alerte » ; his last article was published in March 1943…

(…)

The picture would not be complete, if we forgot to report this essential sentence also pronounced by Pierre Bénouville before Laure Adler:

« I had rented an apartment in Geneva which became a central office. All sorts of people came to work there. Everything that mattered, that had to do with Switzerland, passed through there. Including François Mitterrand's private envoy, Bettencourt, who didn't know that it led to me. »

(…)

It's funny how small the world is : here it is tiny! Even the Mitterrand of the fine Schueller team (cf. the magazine « Votre Beauté », at the Liberation), the father-in-law of André Bettencourt and the father of the Liliane of the same name, at whose house the Sarkozy of sinister memory went...

When one adds that in 1995, the meeting for the transfer of presidential power between François Mitterrand and Jacques Chirac took place at the very home of Pierre Guillain de Bénouville, is there not a whole universe taking shape? »

https://blogs.mediapart.fr/michel-j-cuny/blog/091214/pierre-guillain-de-benouville-l-homme-qui-fait-tomber-jean-moulin

From the documents and testimonies, it is clear that Pierre Bénouville played a key role in the various French governments that have followed one another since the Second World War. Assuredly a member of the terrorist organisation the Cagoule. Presumed head of the terrorist organisation the Cagoule, he governed in the shadows, distributing, in his own words, his directives to François Mitterrand every week. François Méténier and Pierre Bénouville succeeded one another as Mitterrand's servants of the state in the manner of « dealing agents».

« Did François Mitterrand ask you for advice? Yes, he asked me. For him, you were a second family? Yes, because I had belonged to the family for too long. One day, for example, when he was a minister, he said to me: « I'm worried, who will be appointed to Sud Aviation? » I said, « Politically, you need to do something that would be fair and show that you are acting without any bigotry. » I would name Jacque Mitterrand. He said to me, taken aback : « Really? » - « Yes, I would appoint him, he is an excellent general officer. He is an army general. - More, he's an real aeronautical technician and since he's the brother of a man who's supposed to embody the left, everyone will be breathless, starting with him. » - "Ah," he said to me, « I'll talk to the president of the Republic about it. » Jacques was appointed. François often consulted me before important appointments in the industrial and political world. Often, I would say to him: « You are wrong, because he will surely betray you. I saw these people live, I knew their dark and light sides. »

Before the night falls - Interviews by Pierre Bénouville with Laure Adler - Grasset et Fasquelle - 2002

In view of the facts, it is legitimate to think that members of the terrorist organization called The Cagoule have been leading French presidents and governments since the Second World War.

During the Second World War, Pierre Bénouville aka…, made weekly trips to Switzerland without being bothered in the least by the nazis. According to the testimonies, the Petain government ensured his safety and his free movement. There he met Allen Dulles  and surely Claude Dansey, head of, among others, MI6 and the spy entity of unknown legal nature called Z. Z and the Cagoule are two private entities of unknown legal form.

« André Marie received from Boissarie in February-March 1947, in addition to new proof of Hardy's lies about his escape on June 7, 1943, the assurance that Barbie had negotiated with Hardy's two leaders, Frenay and Bénouville : Before June 7, the date of Hardy's arrest, and after June 11, 1943, these negotiations had led to the elimination of their two « bêtes noires », Delestraint and Moulin. The hatred common to the Sipo-SD and the Combat leaders was shared by Dulles, the backer, informed, on a daily basis, by Bénouville and (in Berne) by Davet, and as linked to the Petainists and the anti-communist left in France as to the German Nazis or Nazifieds (of the Zentrumcatholic) and the Italian fascists. »

The non-purification of France - From 1943 to the 1950s - Annie Lacroix-Riz - Armand Collin 2019

Pierre Bénouville is linked to Allen Dulles and several killers of the Cagoule and, indeed, to the crimes they committed.

« As for Bénouville, it was Servan-Schreiber who attacked him as follows: « I had little merit in pointing out, as soon as the new Parliament was elected, that killers were entering it and I knew at least three of them ». »

https://cluny-histoiresdhistoire.com/2021/09/30/berty-albrecht-le-sacrifice-du-matin-24/

Another government servant official, adviser to François Mitterrand, Pierre François Marie de Grossouvre, who was found dead in his office at the Elysée Palace, also declared a few months after the death of Minister Pierre Bérégovoy, murdered with two revolver bullets in the head, that there were killers in the French government : « Serge Raffy notes that, after the death of Bérégovoy in particular, François de Grossouvre had redoubled his vehemence: "François de Grossouvre had summoned his small troop of media confessors, equipped with their respectful notebooks, separately of course. And there, the words were terrible. « I have spent thirty-five years of my life in the service of a man. You see where it has led. All this corruption, easy money, and worse. You'll see, one day it will all come out. Among them, there are assassins, men ready to do anything. They are dangerous. » » (State suicide at the Elysée - The incredible death of François de Grossouvre - Eric Raynaud - Editions Alphée . Jean-Paul Bertrand - 2009)

René Lucet

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/René_Lucet

https://www.franceinter.fr/emissions/rendez-vous-avec-x/rendez-vous-avec-x-10-juin-2020

https://www.haoui.com/newsletter/newsgab.php?date=2019-08-06

Pierre Bérégovoy

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Bérégovoy

François Marie de Grossouvre

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/François_de_Grossouvre

https://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/2010/06/18/01016-20100618ARTFIG00575-grossouvre-sa-famille-conteste-la-these-du-suicide.php

https://www.liberation.fr/france/2019/07/19/francois-de-grossouvre-l-ombre-d-un-president_1740947/

Perversion, the signature of Nazi behavior

Did François de Grossouvre classify Pierre Bénouville, like Servan Schreiber, as a killer? Like Pierre Bérégovoy, François de Grossouvre went to war against this state corruption. Like Bérégovoy, he had begun to write a book denouncing them. Like Bérégovoy, his head and brain were destroyed by a 357 magnum. A symbolic death : destroying the thought that allows to confound the criminals. This killing is similar to that of the Chilean singer and composer Victor Jara, whose executioners cut off his fingers one by one before executing him. It is a fascist constant, to kill intelligence where it has sinned, that is to say, by the vector it has used to oppose the crime, to challenge and fight against a dictatorship. Not only serial killers have a criminal signature, criminals against humanity, mass murderers, Nazis, fascists, etc. also have a criminal signature.

« Signature crime refers to a distinctive crime so similar in pattern, scheme, modus operandi to previous crimes that it identifies a particular defendant as the perpetrator. Signature crimes are also offenses involved the same victim and contained nearly identical alleged fact scenarios. However, the prior crime and the charged crime need not have to be so-called signature" crimes sharing unique and distinguishing characteristics in order to be considered closely related. In State v. Davis, 389 So. 2d 71 (La. 1980), it was held that a finding that the crimes were signature crimes was not by itself determinative of admissibility, because it was also necessary that the other offenses be relevant to a real issue such as identity. The test for finding signature crimes is not whether there was evidence that a defendant committed both crimes, but whether there was a unique method used in committing the crimes »

https://definitions.uslegal.com/s/signature-crime/

The Nazis used sexuality and violent punishments to train future soldiers, creating what Klaus Theweleit calls a fragmented body and consequently a fragmented mind, of the MKultra type. « The « new man », this product of the old man, trained to fight himself, feels indebted only to the machine that gave him birth. He is a pure product of the taming machine, conceived without the help of women, without parents. If it has links or relations, it can only be towards other specimens of new men, to which it assembles in macro-machine-troupe. » (Fantasmalgories - Klaus Theweleit - 1977)

The « new man », nazi human or MKultra human conditioned by a fragmentation of the body and the spirit, is a corporal cuirass devoid of psyche. The only consciousness that he has of himself is « to be able to do what it is necessary » without however being able to measure if this « to be able to do what it is necessary » is moral or legal since his mechanized emotional functioning only predisposes him to obey to masters or impulses.

It is worth noting in passing that it is England, which is secretly holding and torturing the prisoner of war and hostage known as Julian Paul Assange, that opposed the extradition of the criminal against humanity and torturer Augusto Pinochet, friend of Margareth Tatcher. The Lords considered that the dictator Augusto Pinochet should continue to benefit from his immunity although an international warrant had been issued against him for crimes against humanity.

Perversion - « The action of diverting something from its true nature, from normality; the result of this action and the action of changing into evil, of corrupting and the result of this action » - is the founding principle around which the verb, the mental structure and the acts of the individuals who consider themselves as a cell of the « body » of the Nazi « social body » or submit to its diktat are articulated. Nazi rhetoric is that of the antinomy, the antithesis, the oximore, the counter-order.

The Nazi structure is hierarchical, the strongest dominating the weakest, this supremacy being obtained by force. It is based on the principle of « prohibition - Injection », the surreptitious transgression of the prohibition being encouraged, even organized by those who command. This incoherence at all levels of the group creates emotional and intellectual incoherence that eventually turns into psychopathology, which in turn can lead to more or less severe psychosis. 

« Psychopathy is a personality disorder characterized by emotional disorders and antisocial behavior. (…) Conscious of his acts, capable of prudence and premeditation, devoid of any compassion, the psychopath is also, according to psychiatry, not very receptive to the dissuasive character of punishment [5, p. 72-76]. The justice system must therefore establish preventive measures to deal with a type of criminal whose risk of recidivism appears to be very high. Long considered synonymous, antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) and psychopathy are, according to Hare, quite different disorders. The DSM-IV [1, p. 645-650] defines antisocial personalities according to a series of seven behavioural criteria: (1) repeated failure to conform to social norms, (2) deception characterized by swindling as well as repeated use of lies and fictitious identities, (3) impulsivity or inability to plan, (4) irritability and aggression characterized by regular physical attacks or conflicts, (5) indifference to one's own safety and that of others, (6) irresponsibility or inability to meet one's professional and financial obligations, (7) lack of remorse made evident by the indifference displayed and the rationalization of one's faults and/or crimes. To be diagnosed as an antisocial personality, the patient must possess at least three of the characteristics listed, be at least eighteen years of age, and have experienced "conduct disorder" before the age of fifteen.

At least three of the seven criteria for identifying an individual that can be applied to antisocial personalities apply to most of the individuals involved in the Assange case : « (1) repeated failure to conform to social norms (constant violation of the laws), (2) deception characterized by swindling as well as repeated use of lies and fictitious identities, (7) lack of remorse made evident by the indifference displayed and the rationalization of one's faults and/or crimes. »

Hare's Psychopathy Checklist consists of twenty items, the set of symptoms whose correlation forms the syndrome. The first set of factors indicates the interpersonal and emotional characteristics of psychopathy : casualness and superficial charm, grandiose self-esteem, pathological lying, tendencies to con and manipulate, lack of remorse and guilt, shallow emotions, insensitivity and lack of empathy, inability to admit responsibility for one's actions. 

The psychopath's specific lifestyle characteristics and antisocial attitudes are described by the second set of factors : need for stimulation/high propensity for boredom, parasitic lifestyle, lack of realistic long-term goals, numerous short-term marital relationships, impulsivity, irresponsibility, poor behavioural control, early behavioural problems, juvenile delinquency, revocation of parole, sexual promiscuity, criminal versatility Based on semi-structured interviews and a thorough review of the patient's biographical data, the clinician assigns each item a score ranging from zero to two. When the total sum of the scores is greater than or equal to thirty, the probability of psychopathy is considered high.

(…)

A number of empirical tests have been used to specify the personality traits of the psychopath: attenuated experience of fear and empathy, difficulties with certain types of instrumental learning, weakness in moral reasoning and reduced knowledge of the emotional content of words.»

https://www.cairn.info/revue-psn-2014-1-page-31.htm

When we switch in the psychopathic universe, almost all of the symptoms indicative of the presence of the syndrome in an individual are found in the Nazis, in the members of the Paraktatos described in this complaint, in entities of unknown legal form, in the members of secret societies and in a good part of the members of sovereign governments during Covid 19 terrorist Operation, and more particularly in France, where all, or almost all of them have been complicit in torture, and even worse, in the torture of children, without showing the slightest signs of empathy or culpabilty. These symptoms can also be identified in the French teachers who tortured the children in their care without being aware that they were endangering the physical and psychological health of the children in their care, without being aware that they were committing a crime against humanity and proving at the same time their inability to respect the laws and constitution of their country. In France, the teaching profession as a whole has demonstrated gregarious psychopathological behaviour : « (1) repeated failure to conform to social norms, (5) indifference to one's own safety and that of others, (7) lack of remorse made evident by the indifference displayed and the rationalization of one's faults and/or crimes, lack of remorse and guilt, shallow emotions, insensitivity and lack of empathy. » Charles Hernu, who obstructed justice, lied, and threatened Captain Paul Barril with death, also showed symptoms of a psychopath. When Pierre Bénouville says that he finds refuge in a hotel that he says invaded by the Germans when it is impossible, that this building turns out to be the USA embassy, he is lying, he is fabricating, he is reinventing history, he is manipulating the citizens who don't know him, he is passing himself off as something he is not, as someone he is not.

When, after donning the uniform of the Nazi in the hotel room assigned to him, he says: « It was extraordinary, this situation where I was forced to assume the identity of my enemy », he openly mocks the readers of his book. He displays the behaviour of psychopaths and with psychopaths you have to be very careful because every word they use is used to deliver the truth, or a part of truth, without telling it. The word « extraordinary » has a positive connotation. Bénouville finds the experience out of the ordinary but not unpleasant. In this situation, in enemy's territory, no resistance fighter would have expressed his feelings in this way, primarily because he would have had to face his fear and disgust. This is one of Pierre Bénouville's characteristics, he is never afraid. He says that he is forced to take on the identity of his enemy, but there is no reason for him to take on this uniform. He is alone in the room. He does not use the word uniform but « identity ». So he explains that he is taking on the identity of a Nazi. It is therefore likely that in this sentence Bénouville means to his readers, without saying so openly, that he is a Nazi, that this Nazi, although being himself, is his own enemy - a thing which, by its nature, is in opposition to another thing and can harm the latter - because he plays other roles, notably that of a Resistance fighter, even if, contrary to what he says, this is belatedly. This Nazi is an American Nazi because this hotel, full of Nazis, is the US embassy. Moreover, Bénouville himself confirms his chameleon nature when he tells Laure Adler : « I have often had to transform myself. And that's when you had to hold a steady hand. The fact of having to choose and being morally obliged to do so led to an almost metaphysical transformation. » (Before the Night Comes - Interviews with Laure Adler - Grasset et Fasquelle -2002) Finally, he shows an « inordinate amount of self-esteem » when he says of his role at Dassault: « I still belong to the board today. When I arrive, there is a delegation of workers at the head office waiting to say hello to me, one after the other, and to inquire about me as if I were a precious object. It's me they come to shake hands with first. This naturally touches me. »

Reading these words, it is legitimate to wonder who runs Dassault Industries, Pierre Bénouville or Marcel Dassault. 

All psychopaths operate on the same principle. They are con artists, predators who lie to get their way, and to make their lies believable, they always introduce in it elements of truth. This psychopathological functioning is constant in the protagonists of the Assange affair or in the Mitterrand clan. Stella Morriz, aka… repeatedly announces the possible suicide of her fake husband without showing a hint of emotion. Mitterrand hides an alduterine daughter while France as a whole does not care about her existence and she is in no more danger than her sons. Why make so much noise about an event that is not an event? This is how con artists, psychopaths, Nazis do it. They light counterfires to distract the audience from the crimes they are committing. The first disguise of reality is the disguise of identity. 

« Among all the reasons, two support the maintenance of the homosexual ban: on the one hand, homosexuality should not be allowed to develop into a sexuality that would be difficult to manage and control.

On the other hand, its legalisation would have brought down a realm of transgression in which being initiated and accepted was synonymous with belonging to the secret domain of the ruling elite. It was not possible for the Nazis to give up both, because there was no other area of social life that gave them access to power. Instead of giving the freedom to choose, they gave the freedom to break the forbbiden.

It is a way of subjugating in two ways: on the one hand, by linking to the movement that grants it, and on the other, by turning this link into a binding relationship: if you no longer do what the « movement » demands, you can be slandered or called to account. In the end, it is another double bind which, on the homo-masculine side, is added to that of the prohibition/injunction of incest: you must love men but under no circumstances be homosexual. And you must break the ban but you will be punished for it (if it pleases the powerful). These fabricated double binds are time bombs of sorts; although tightrope walkers who are particularly comfortable with power plays may walk on the « razor's edge »- they will never abolish the double bind.

At best, they obey and suppress contradictions. Potential deterritorialisation (abolition of certain bourgeois prohibitions) is on the whole channelled in such a way that it leads to a system of confusion and dependence which is only liveable if it is accepted as a system of unconditional obedience or as a system of endless intrigue. Only power holds it all together.

(…)

The process of the principal is different from that of the torturer. The body cannot discharge itself by the blow that relieves, the pleasure must come from sight and hearing. It is partly produced through the identity of « bloody mush » perception, with a few more particularities. (…) This pleasure is partly due to the perception of what the punishment produces: the change of state of the victim. If the latter is able to resist at the beginning by fighting wildly or screaming, at the end he lies or hangs, apathetic and bloody, reduced to silence or still uttering a few grunts. The operation targets the skin and flesh. The skin must burst, the flesh must twitch. The objects used - ox nerve a riding crop, or the rubber club commonly used by the soldiers occupying the Ruhr in 1920 - do not usually damage the bone structure.

(…)

Bandera in Uruguay is the form of torture that consists of beating the limbs of a prisoner bounces until they flap in pain like a flag in the wind.

(…)

The great spectacle of physical punishment is not reduced to savagery, it follows protocols and rules, as Foucault rightly points out - but not only. Everything that happens to the torture victim is calculated: the amount of beating he can take, the intensity of the pain, the effect on witnesses who might have been in the torture victim's place; but what about the masturbation of the SS? Why does the victim who has to scream have to be a « fag »?

(…)

With each blow and each scream, a considerable amount of the pleasure that the victim is supposed to have experienced is detached from him and penetrates the voyeur.

(…)

he important thing is to describe the bodily processes and to try to understand them. For the torturer certainly does not « want » anything that Améry attributes to him (« to go beyond this world », etc.); he strives to contain his body, and this is something that men will strive to do by torture as long as they are not able to save it from fragmentation by any other means.

In other words, one would be well advised to renounce, for example, the concept of sadism in order to unload the historical heaps that prevent one from approaching the phenomena; this is what is happening to all conceptual systems, and especially to thinking that is predominantly abstract; caught up in the eternal auto-historical-reflexive spiral, it is no longer able to pierce the crust of reality. »

Fantasmâlgories - Klaus Theweleit - L’Arche - 2015

Even if Klaus Theweleit calls for the concept to be consigned to oblivion in order to liberate the word of the sadists, it is essential to underline that the relationships between beings within the Nazi group are marked by sadism. « Sadism is the search for pleasure in suffering (physical or moral: domination, control) voluntarily inflicted on others (possibly an animal or a child). (…) In psychoanalysis, sadism is most often coupled with masochism.» (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sadisme)

In the Nazi social universe, sadism is rarely coupled with masochism because sexuality is used as a dressage tool from childhood onwards, as a punitive weapon aimed at the submission of the one who is raped, with sodomy ensuring the supremacy of the victor for the dominant male, with the sodomised one, who is considered weaker, being relegated to the rank of « good wife » how says Gore Vidal, and as a torture.

« It remains to be seen why a certain form of sexual intercourse between men can, in existing normative hetero societies and from a psychodynamic point of view, take on the function of brutal self-engendering intercourse. In other words, how does one turn anal intercourse into a maintenance process?

Two hypotheses in this regard :

Firstly, there is a strong possibility that the divisive tendency (which can go as far as the murder fantasy) of the (passive) object is not only directed against the abused partner.

If penetrating the anus implies penetrating a « forbidden territory », treading on the « non erect », wandering of desire, as Hocquenghem shows, then the violent and persecutory penetration of this same territory is akin to a persecution of desire in itself.

In so doing, anal (murderous) coitus would succeed in engendering the totality of the persecutor in the same way that the devitalizing act of white terror aims to turn the victim into a « bloody pulp »

If the anus is the place targeted by the aggression, it would be because it conceals vast deterritorialization that the being, not yet arrived at term, senses and that it seeks, for this reason, to neutralize, on pain of being torn apart itself..

Secondly, the anus could become the privileged place for the persecution of desires because it would make it possible to bypass engulfing femininity without having to renounce the dangerous vitality of venereal evil. This could be the case when the fear of being engulfed again by erotic femininity is so great that this type of man does not even dare to approach the woman in order to annihilate her.

One could even see in it the fear of being annihilated on the spot by the symbiosis of engulfing femininity or of losing all control - to the point of becoming violent or pitiful - to the point of seeking refuge in anal sex.

These two hypotheses do not relate to the attributes of a sexual organisation of the homosexual type, they only acquire their plausibility (if at all) on the condition that they are based on a social organisation where homo-masculine sexuality is forbidden. Indeed, the anus can only assume this function in a society where it takes the place of a « desire to have desire » against which a dissolution is conducted.

Passively enduring anal intercourse is considered particularly demeaning. »

Fantasmâlgories - Klaus Theweleit - L’Arche - 2015

« Jacob stayed two days and three nights in the dungeon without receiving any food. Other prisoners brought him food at night, risking their lives. These days were before a Sunday.

That Sunday I accidentally saw how Bachmayer, in the company of Hauptscharfurher Heider, approached Jacob. He took an iron pickaxe about 30 cm long and hit Jacob ten to fifteen times in the face. Then Bachmayer took the unfortunate man and tied him up. He tied his arms and legs behind his back and hung him in a room. He pulled down the blackout curtains and closed the room.

Bachmayer was helped by the Lagerältester Schöp, a German detainee allegedly held for security reasons. The Hauptscharfurher Heider was present and looked on with interest, like a curious person watching the slaughter of an animal. At about 7 a.m. on Monday, Jacob was still in the dungeon. Bachmayer ordered an SS man to remove Jaco's jacket, which the SS did. Then he killed him.

(…)

These K prisoners were immediately sent to the prison. Their clothes were removed and they were taken to the "shower rooms". The shower room, located in the cellars of the prison, near the crematorium, was specially designed for the execution of prisoners, either by shooting or by asphyxiation.

A very special measuring rod was used for this purpose. The prisoner was placed under this measuring, which automatically dropped a bullet in the back of his head as soon as it reached the top of his skull. When « K » 's delivery was too important, instead of wasting time measuring them, it was exterminated by asphyxiation by means of a gas sent through the water pipes.

(…)

Bachmayer was a sadist. His specialty was to arouse two dogues on the inmates and have them tear. In the language of the camp, it was said: « Inmate X died from a kiss from the dog ».

(…)

In at least 50% of the cases, the interrogation consisted solely of beatings. When the cries of pain of the beaten inmates rang out in the premises, all members of the SS interrupted their work and ran into the premises to participate in the action or simply to witness it.

The 186 steps - Mathausen - Christian Bernadac - Editions France Empire - 1974

Sadism is the backbone of the Nazi mafia system. Every authority figure is sadistic because the structure is only viable if there is drastic coercion in all its workings. The dominant one maintains himself by blackmail, fear, manipulation and torture. Theweleit puts it perfectly : « … that it leads to a system of confusion and dependence which is only liveable if it is accepted as a system of unconditional obedience or as a system of endless intrigue. Only power holds it all together. »

As all social ascension passes through a secret sadistic initiation, an indefectible interdependence is created between individuals. They all have each other, because any perversion revealed in broad daylight can cause their downfall in a social environment that is not entirely under their dominance. Once again, Theweleit has conceptualized it perfectly : « On the other hand, its legalisation would have brought down a realm of transgression in which being initiated and accepted was synonymous with belonging to the secret domain of the ruling elite. It was not possible for the Nazis to give up both, because there was no other area of social life that gave them access to power. Instead of giving the freedom to choose, they gave the freedom to break the forbbiden. »

The Nazi social body is unhealthy because the cohesion between the « human-cells » that compose it is maintained only through the absolute submission of a few elements and through an education that use the fragmentation of bodies and minds, of the MKultra type. It is as if the Nazi system was constantly functioning on life support. It is enough to eradicate the « stem cells » to eradicate the whole system. Contrary to the claims of what Joseph Goebbels called « political dogma », the Nazi system does not follow the rules of natural selection, since the « human-cells » of the Nazi social body do not confront the ecosystem that colonise, but bypass it by neutralizing by cunning everything that hinders their deployment. The structure that takin place can only be maintained by remaining hidden, a bit like a cancer that advances by stealth. They lie, they cheat to prevent the « body » they colonize from setting up a defense system, if we follow their biological logic applied to the social, they prevent any colonized body from activating its « social immune defenses ». This explains why Adolf Hitler said that « the Empire would be made by the Sword and by the Cradle ». They need to infect the « stem cells » of what he call the social body, in order to ensure a fighting force. Hence the importance of Lebensborn and Baden-Powell type warrior trainers. Nazism is a social pathology that advocates a « political dogma » as Goebbels so rightly states.

« The military cadet is locked within four walls. Outings, in principle forbidden, are only allowed if he strictly observes the rules in force in the establishment.

The relationship between residents is hierarchical. Age is the first hierarchy. Then comes the rank of the cadet according to his merit. All cadets are ranked in relation to each other, so that each can tell who is above or below him. Each has authority and the right to punish his subordinates and the duty to obey his superiors. Whoever is at the very bottom of the hierarchy must arrange for someone to be even lower.

Everything is planned and everything is public. Nowhere to retreat to. The doors of the toilets show the feet and heads of the person who occupies them. The pants have no pockets. The cadet must open the letters he receives and present the signatory.

The letters with a female signatory are read by the instructor and most often torn up; only the mothers' letters are returned.

No one lives alone. The dormitories have no doors but large openings. It is forbidden to speak from one bed to another. From a small room in the corner of the dormitory, an officer had a view of the whole room through a window hidden by a curtain.

No warning is given. A mistake is only recognized after it has been made by the reaction of the one who already knows. Each newcomer has to make all the mistakes (which can vary according to the degree of intelligence) that the predecessors have made, which the latter wait for, of course, to do to the newcomers what they endured when they arrived in the institution. Their principle of justice: the same torments for everyone. The principle is strictly observed; there is no reason to excuse error.

The punishments that cadets inflict on each other are exclusively about the body. Solomon witnessed, from the very first day, the torture inflicted by a non-commissioned officer on a cadet for a miserable offence: the cadet had to remain with his knees bent while holding, with his arms held, a tray in balance covered with charms, all without being pricked by the compass the non-commissioned officer had placed, open to one hundred and eighty degrees, exactly between the heels and the buttocks of the « offender ». The accomplished task means an immediate advancement in the hierarchy. The cadet is no longer the last « bundle » - all newcomers are "bundles" and are treated accordingly: emptied, decored, stuffed.

(…)

Even my brother, by now, was inclined to believe my theory that I was a foundling. A guy like that, he said, could not be my brother.

In the end, even the shit (which return too much to the interior of the punished) turns into an attack against the peripheries of the body. It will be necessary to pay in pretium doloris, the only currency of exchange:

The cadets formed a circle around me. Each carried a badine. Leather straps were attached to the wooden handles. They were used for cleaning clothes. Glasmacher walked over to me, took me by the arm and led me to the table. I climbed it with difficulty and lay on my stomach. Glasmacher put his hands around my head. He closed my eyes and pressed my skull against the table top. I gritted my teeth and tensed my muscles. Already the first blow was fall on me. I flinched but Glasmacher held me. Then it was a hail of blows, on my back, my shoulders, my legs. An endless fire of blows. My fingers clutched the edges of the table. I banged my knee, shin and toes against the wood to ease the pain. Now all the pain seemed to enter the table. My hips and ribs banged against the shivering wood. Each blow put a new explosive charge into the mass of muscle, skin, blood, bone and veins. In the end, my body was swollen and tense to burst. I abandoned my head entirely in Glasmacher's hands, gave one last gasp and finally collapsed with a groan.

(…)

Little by little, the body accepts the pain administered to its periphery as a response to the search for pleasure. It takes it at face value. The pleasure principle is removed. It is brought back into line, reorganising the whole into a body that masters the « pain principle » : what hurts is good.

Finally, the « ballot » receives his baptism de la ligne - no wonder this bullying appears in German naval manuals as one of the highlights of a sailor's life. But the real end of the ballotage was the visit to the town dentist, with all his instruments. The elders, jubilantly, asked the bundles to go to the company office. And, willy-nilly, each bundle had to sit in the little chair. The one the cadets called « Uncle Dental » worked for quite some time with his pliers in the poor victim's wide open mouth. One after the other, he pulled out all the baby teeth still present.

The dental uncle watched me with a devilish grin as I spat blood into a bucket intended for that purpose. Later, Glasmacher consoled me by telling me that in the past, it was even customary to give the "Ballots" a good portion of castor oil to swallow, so that they were cleaned, so to speak, from the inside.

With the last milk tooth, the last anchorage in the maternal sea goes away in a bucket of blood. The rock stretches its neck over its uniform collar. »

Fantasmâlgories - Klaus Theweleit - L’Arche - 2015

« Baden Powell was triumphant: for two hundred and ten days, he made the besiegers believe that he had three thousand soldiers when he did not have seven hundred. All day long, civilians disguised as soldiers unrolled skeins of wire tangled with string, simulating the missing barbed wire. They dug shafts where they buried disturbing round boxes full of sand, because they did not have any mines. Sometimes, disaster struck, one of these mines - an innocent charge - exploded. Stretcher-bearers evacuated bloody fake wounded with chromium mercury. Ten-year-olds, many of them natives, but trained as spies, would slip into the Boer lines. They knew how to observe, how to report, how to use the codes. If they were caught, they reluctantly revealed the locations of powerful fortifications, innumerable artillery pieces, food and ammunition depots, and stressed that the morale of the troops was high. The Boers released them, because they did not have the heart to throw kids in jail. »