The more than ten years lasting Assange affair is a compendium of lies, corruption, cheating, fraud, blackmail, extortion, usurpation of office, usurpation of identity, falsification of official documents, violations of fundamental human rights, violation of international law by private entities operating on the principle of mafias, acting in collusion within sovereign states that they have plundered of their sovereignty by colonising and undermining their institutional and governmental machineries.

The Assange case is a compendium of fake news, inept storytelling and defamation propagated by the mainstream media in violation of their own Munich Charter.

The Assange case is a mock trial conducted by illegal private entities, on private territory belonging to the Crown of England, under feudal law and the Navigation Act of 1660, in private Courts not governed by English sovereign law but by the British Crown, based on an indictment violating the US Constitution and international law (see rationale below), conducted unlawfully by an grand jury mandated by the Obama-Clinton administration against a citizen known only through the pseudonym Julian Paul Assange, aka Julian Paul Hawkins, aka Mendax and not by his birth name.

The Assange case is the trial of a man without name, tried by judges who are not qualified to do so, defended by lawyers who have deep interest ties with the highest interests of the accusation side located in the USA.

The Assange case amounts to ten years of arbitrary sequestration incommunicado and torture inflicted on a citizen who is free of any charge.

Through the Assange case, the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange has been instrumentalised by entities such as the Wau Holland Foundation, the Obama-Clinton administration, the British crown, political parties like DIEM 25, notably in link with the establishment of a universal jurisdiction.

This universal jurisdiction does not serve justice. It stages mock trials that end up destroying fundamental human rights and letting crimes unsanctioned or hidden. It allows private entities that are not subject to international law to take possession of the institutions of certain sovereign countries in order to neutralise them for set up a world government.

The Assange affair is a keystone of a subterranean war, more and more visible though, a war expressed in different manner and words, by political leaders such as Alexandre Loukachenko, Donald Trump, Jean-Luc Mélenchon, or Boris Johnson who appeals to the spirit of the Blitz and the New Jerusalem so dear to the heart of the English people.

This New Jerusalem, conceived by the English under Nazi bombings, like the social security system created by Ambroise Croizat at the end of the war, are the fruits of the grains sowed by the European philosophers of the Enlightenment, inscribed on the pediments of our institutions: Liberty, Equality, Fraternity.

This investigation report and this complaint aim essentially at bringing to the attention of the judicial authorities, the crimes and presumptions of crimes which threaten these fundamental values which are the cement of democracies in sovereign countries.

This investigation report and complaint are the property of everybody. We urge the judicial authorities of sovereign countries and all citizens of the world to use it to put an end to all crimes committed by the private or public entities against which it is filed.

We urge the judicial authorities and all citizens of the world to use it to free the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange, who was held incommunicado and tortured by private entities whose crimes he denounced, crimes that endanger all citizens of the world.

It is urgent that the sovereign governments of the world ensure the safety of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange and give him the opportunity to testify publicly about the crimes he witnessed and suffered. Many citizens from different countries have also been victims of these crimes. They have the right to know the truth. The citizen known as Julian Paul Assange and the governments of sovereign countries have a duty to tell it to them.

For all intents and purposes, we recall that the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange, presented by the media storytelling to the public, presents distinctive signs that make it possible to identify him.

Boris Johnson : “In the depths of the second world war, in 1942 when just about everything had gone wrong, the government sketched out a vision of the post war new Jerusalem that they wanted to build. And that is what we are doing now – in the teeth of this pandemic.”

https://www.conservativehome.com/parliament/2020/10/the-prime-ministers-full-text-he-says-that-like-churchills-wartime-government-his-is-sketching-out-a-vision-of-a-new-jerusalem.html

Jean-Luc Mélenchon denounces the closed-doors “Defence council“ which governs France instead of the Council of ministers. We have to guess that this council set up the “Global security law” agenda, which gives to private security agents similar power as state policemen. MPs life goes on during lock-down.

https://youtu.be/DvxAc0V1s-M

Alexander Loukashenko uncovers the 900 M$ IMF “offer“ to force covid lockdown in Belarus. He calls “hybrid war“ the NATO/EU interventional pressure to get him out of presidency (for the pure love of democracy so indisputably incarnated by president Macron or his mentor Angela Merkel).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvEN6mGhhHs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=5&v=gl6RtxVLRj8&feature=emb_title

https://www.belta.by/president/view/net-bolshej-tsennosti-chem-suverennaja-i-nezavisimaja-belarus-lukashenko-nikomu-ne-pozvolit-slomat-395381-2020/

https://greatgameindia.com/belarus-world-bank-coronavirus-conditions/

https://blogs.mediapart.fr/basicblog/blog/051020/ingerence-et-propagande-de-guerre-contre-les-bielorusses-et-loukachenko

https://mindanaogoldstardaily.com/lockdown-for-money-2/

Donald Trump: The NYT titles “Trump’s War Against ‘the Deep State’ Enters a New Stage”.

Trump’s legal team claims to have tremendous proofs of massive 2020 electoral fraud. Donald Trump says that USA itself is in danger to disappear, together with freedom and democracy. If the massive fraud is real, Trump is probably right. If the fraud is made up by his team (huge lies to keep the power), then US democracy is also in great danger. In both hypothesis, a war on democracy, i.e. against people will, is on-going.

https://www.ntd.com/trump-says-he-will-never-concede-to-fake-ballots-and-dominion_532070.htm

After a year and a half of investigation, Human Rights Association WJJA have proved that :

The name Julian Paul Assange is a pseudonym. The citizen known as Julian Paul Assange cannot be prosecuted under a name with is not his birth name. All proceedings against him are false and illegal. Swedish prosecutions and European warrants issued under Julian Paul Assange pseudonyms are therefore false and illegal. The political asylum and nationality established under the pseudonym Julian Paul Assange are therefore false. Any paper drawn up under the pseudonym Julian Paul Assange (identity card, driving licence, passport) is false and illegal.

➔ The birth certificate of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange does not bear his mother's signature and no father's name is mentioned. The name on this birth certificate, Julian Paul Hawkins and the information concerning this citizen have no legal value. The citizen known as Julian Paul Assange, aka Julian Paul Hawkins, aka Mendax, has no legal identity. He cannot be the subject of legal proceedings under any of these names.

We ask the sovereign government of the United Kingdom to kindly bring the official identity of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange to the attention of the general public and to provide proof of that identity.

As none of the legal proceedings against the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange are made under his birth name, none of these proceedings are legal.

https://www.planv.com.ec/sites/default/files/anexo_3.pdf
page 13 and page 20

The citizen known as Julian Paul Assange is therefore not subject to any legal proceedings. He must be released immediately

➔   The Criminal Court of Old Bailey is owned and operated by the City of London Corporation. It is an enclave which is legally independent from Britain and is a possession of the British Crown. The City of London Corporation, as a corporation, guild, association of businessmen, is not a subject of international law and therefore cannot sign treaties with states. The citizen known as Julian Assange cannot be tried in a court that is not administered by the UK Department of Justice. This procedure is a sham trial.

The citizen known as Julian Paul Assange is therefore in the hands of private entities who are holding him hostage.

➔  As defined by its constitution, the United States cannot be considered as a sovereign "state", but a conglomerate of private entities. They are managed by private entities that are not linked to each other or to a central federal power. Each private entity, wrongly called a state, functions autonomously and cannot be considered as a sovereign state, subject to international law.

Consequently, the USA cannot be considered as a sovereign interlocutor by any other sovereign state, nor can it be a prescriber with regard to any international decision involving sovereign countries. Even US domestic elections are marred by this legal dysfunction. We urge the President of the United States of America and Congress to remedy this as soon as possible.

As long as American federalism is not managed by a sovereign central government, each entity composing it can only be considered as a private entity subject to the international laws voted by the other sovereign states. Consequently, they can be conquered and annexed to any other sovereign state. They have no legality. As a further consequence, the U.S. Army cannot be considered a regular army in the service of a sovereign state, but rather mercenary units in the service of private entities that any sovereign country is entitled to drive out of its territory without there is a declaration of war.

➔   Judge Vanessa Baraitser was in charge of the Alexandre Djouhri case involving Nicolas Sarkozy. This case links Judge Baraitser to the Carlyle group of which Olivier Sarkozy was president. The Carlyle Group is the parent company of Booz Allen & Hamilton, headed by Robert James Woolsey, former director of the CIA, the company where Edward Snowden worked. The citizen known as Julian Paul Assange helped the citizen known as Edward Snowden flee the United States. There are therefore several major conflicts of interest between the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange and Justice Baraitser. These conflicts of interest are contrary to the rules of fair trial.

➔   Stella Morris, aka Stella or Sara Gonzalez Devant, aka Stella Smith Robertson who claims to be the partner of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange is not a member of the English Bar. She therefore lied about her profession. She cannot be the lawyer for the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange. She does not have the right to be in the courtroom where she is yet regularly present. She has three names, none of which appears to be her birth name. She does not appear to have a legal identity. She worked at the Jeanne Sauvé Foundation where her mentor was Canadian Stephen Saideman.

Stephen Saideman has ties with NATO and especially the Council on Foreign Relations, on whose board David M Rubinstein, Cofounder an Co-executive Chairman of the Carlyle Group, Thad W. Allen Senior Executive Advisor Booz Allen Hamilton and Janet Napolitano, President Barack Obama's first Homeland Security Secretary (2009-2013) sit. It is legitimate to consider collusion between Stella Morris, aka Stella or Sara Gonzalez Devant, aka Stella Smith Robertson, Vanessa Baraitser, Booz Allen Hamilton and the Carlyle Group to harm the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange. From the Obama-Clinton administration to the Booz Allen Hamilton led by Robert James Woolsey, all have a vested interest in the disappearance of prosecution witness Julian Paul Assange.

Moreover, since Stella Morris, aka Stella Gonzalez Devant, aka Stella Smith Robertson lied about her profession, it is likely that she lied about the nature of her relationship with the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange and her motherhood.

Through Booz Allen Hamilton and Robert James Woolsey, there is a link with Lord Jacob Rothchild by Genie Energie (Robert James Woolsey, Dick Cheney, Rupert Murdoch and Jacob Rothchild) and the Crown of England, owner of the private entity the City of London and therefore of the management of the Old Bailey. All these collusions are contrary to the rules of fair trial.

➔   Many of the lawyers for the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange are not registered with the English Bar and therefore cannot defend him. This is the case, among others, of Jennifer Robinson, Stella Morris aka Stella or Sara Gonzalez Devant aka Stella Smith Robertson, Geoffrey Robertson. They should not be in a courtroom. This is a major procedural flaw.

➔   Wikileaks is a portal that privatises informations. It is the opposite of open source.

Wikileaks was created by Andy Muller Maghun, director of the Berlin foundation Wau Holland. The Wau Holland foundation is linked to the Chaos Computer Club (CCC), which was in the past working with the Bundesnachrichtendienst – German Intelligence Service. Julian Assange is director of the 04 Wikikealeas project. He is an employee of the Wau Holland Foundation. His boss is Andy Muller Maguhn.

Julian Paul Assange is creative director on Collateral murder. The citizen known as Julian Paul Assange is therefore not criminally responsible for Wikileaks publications.

Wikijustice Report of the Wau Holland Foundation Project 04 Wikileaks

http://monika-karbowska-liberte-pour-julian-assange.ovh/index.php/2020/11/02/wikileaks-as-a-project-of-the-german-wau-holland-foundation/

➔   Collateral murder is a fictional document. It is not a historical document. It is not a journalistic work whose source and provenance are clearly determined. The citizen Julina Paul Assange is the creative director and producer of this document fiction. Making a documentary-fiction is not a crime liable to prosecution

➔   The citizen known as Julian Paul Assange is held incommunicado and tortured on English territory by a private entity whose nature must be determined. He is the subject of a mock trial in private structures with no connection to the legal institutions of the United Kingdom. His identity was deliberately falsified by those who sequestered him so that no identification was possible and proceedings were instituted if, by misfortune, he was killed.

The citizen known as Julian Paul Assange is a hostage or prisoner of war in the hands of private powers who advance in disguise.

After a year and a half of investigation, investigators from the human rights association WJJA believe that the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange may not be the only citizen sequestered by these private entities. Other citizens, presumably including children, appear to be deprived of their fundamental freedoms, abused, mistreated and exploited by these private entities both in the UK and in other countries such as the USA, France, Ukraine, Poland, Palestine, Belgium, Switzerland, Sweden, Germany, Australia and others yet to be identified.

This could be the largest international human trafficking operation by a mafia acting in collusion ever identified.

As the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange has apparently done everything possible to denounce this traffic and the paedocriminal networks that feed on it, he is in great danger since he is in the hands of those whose crimes he has denounced.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/27438

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/2077

https://search.wikileaks.org/?query=%22Jeffrey+Epstein%22&exact_phrase=&any_of=&exclude_words=&document_date_start=&document_date_end=&released_date_start=&released_date_end=&new_search=True&order_by=most_relevant#results

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/53745

Aware that rapid intervention by the judicial and police authorities is desirable in view of the critical situation in which the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange finds himself and the many lives at stake, particularly the lives of very young children, the human rights association WJJA has decided to lodge a complaint with the judicial authorities of the sovereign government of the United Kingdom and with all the judicial authorities of sovereign countries.

After a year and a half of investigation, the human rights association WJJA found that there was widespread corruption in most of the state bodies of sovereign countries that had been gangrenous by these private mafia-like entities.

These corrupt officials hamper investigations and are often themselves involved in trafficking, including at the highest levels of government. Only international cooperation between the police and the judicial authorities of the different sovereign countries that are victims of their crimes, supported by the authorities of those who are spared, will enable the dismantling of this now sprawling mafia.

Citizens other than the one known as Julian Paul Assange have tried to denounce the criminal actions of this international mafia.
We call on the judicial authorities of all sovereign governments to reopen investigations in order to shed light on all their crimes and to eradicate them from all areas where they can or could still be active.

This complaint has universal value. It is addressed to all judicial institutions in the world. It is for the good of each and every one of us. It can be filed by any citizen who wishes to do so with the authorities of his or her country.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/27438

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/2077

https://search.wikileaks.org/?query=%22Jeffrey+Epstein%22&exact_phrase=&any_of=&exclude_words=&document_date_start=&document_date_end=&released_date_start=&released_date_end=&new_search=True&order_by=most_relevant#results

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/53745

Complaint

We, WikiJustice Julian Assange association for the Defence of Human Rights (WJJA), file a complaint addressed to the English, USA and German Courts, and to the judiciary Courts of the sovereign countries which ratified the Universal Declaration of Human Rights for :

►   Incommunicado Detention of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange, as Julian Paul Hawkins, as Mendax

►   Torture of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange, as Julian Paul Hawkins, as Mendax

►   Attempted crime on the person of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange, as Julian Paul Hawkins, as Mendax

►   Manipulation and torture in order to drive the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange to suicide. However, we would like to draw the attention of the justice system to the fact that one of our informant (We protect our sources when they wish to remain anonymous) has mentioned the suicide of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange as early as 2019. Julian Assange was still in the building at 3 Hans Crescent Street. The exact phrase (that has been repeated to us several times is) was: "Julian Assange is going to commit suicide on the plane that is going to extradite him. If I were him, that's what I would do."

The citizen known as John Shipton, whose financial interests are at stake in the Wikileaks case since he owns the domain names collateralmurder.wikileaks.org and Wikileaks.org, and The citizen known as Stella Morris, aka Stella or Sara Gonzalez Devant, aka Stella Smiths Robertson, announce the suicide, one of her alleged son, the second, of the alleged father of her children, if the latter was to be extradited. This unanimous and repetitive statements sound more like an oracle pronounced by the Pithie in the antique temple of Delphes, than a simple fear.

The combativeness of the citizen known as Julian Assange during the various Court hearings does not let our association observers the impression that citizen known as Julian Paul Assange would have suicidal tendencies.

In view of these elements, it is legitimate to think that a crime against the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange is programmed with the intention of disguising it as a suicide.

►   Manipulation and torture citizens of many sovereign countries. Wearing the compulsory mask and confinement are deleterious MKultra type tortures, both physically and psychologically.

Numerous testimonies attest to serious psychopathologies, loss of spatial and temporal reference points, and in children, pathogenic anxiety contrary to the proper development of their bodies and brains, as well as serious respiratory pathologies due to the inhalation of their own carbon dioxide. Under-oxygenation also the respiratory insufficiency and neuro-motor capacities of both children and adults.

We recall that harming children is a violation of the Universal Declaration of the Rights of the Child. (see below).

►   Rendition, containment in dark place or dark room and torture. We kindly ask the judicial authorities of the sovereign countries to reopen the Agisa and El Zery case as well as all other renditions cases.

►   Violation of the Vienna Convention

►   Violation of the Geneva Conventions

►   Violation of the UN Charter

►   Violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and all texts related to human rights

►   Violation of the UN Convention against Torture

►   Violation of fair trial and Habeas Corpus

►   Human slavery

►   Paedocriminality

►   Murder of Karl Koch alias Hagbard, Boris Floricic alias Tron, Ibrahim Botani alias Ibrahim Copy Botani whose circumstances of death remain mysterious and whose birth names may not be legal

A few things about the Chaos Computer Club, Karl Koch and Boris Floricic

https://psychedelicdungeon.wordpress.com/2010/09/15/wikifreaks-pt-4-the-nerds-who-played-with-fire/

https://berlin.ccc.de/~andy/CCC/TRON/wikipedia/erklaerung.htm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tron_(hacker)

https://www.welt.de/wirtschaft/webwelt/article192456/Wie-ein-toter-Hacker-wikipedia-de-lahmlegt.html

http://networkclan.de/pdf/KarlKoch.PDF

https://www.afcea.org/committees/cyber/documents/impactofbndprojectrahabandccconthefutureofcomputer-networkmediatedespionage-cuckooseggpreque.pdf

http://monika-karbowska-liberte-pour-julian-assange.ovh/index.php/2020/11/02/wikileaks-as-a-project-of-the-german-wau-holland-foundation/

Years 2007 to 2009 – implementation of the 04 Wikileaks project in the Wau Holland Foundation

https://www.wired.com/1998/12/out-of-chaos-comes-order/

https://www.lifo.gr/team/sansimera/33786

We call upon the justice of the countries concerned and all the sovereign countries to reopen the investigations concerning these three hackers.

We call on the judiciary of the countries concerned and of sovereign countries to investigate whether other hackers have not died in disturbing circumstances or disappeared after having been in contact with the Chaos Computer Club, Wau Holland, manager of the Wikileaks portal, Pirate Bay or Booz Allen Hamilton (Edward Snowden case).

►   Murder of CIA agent William Buckley involved in the MKultra program

►   Disturbing disappearance of Youri Nosenko involved in the MKultra program

CIA agent William Buckley was one of the key agents involved in the development of the MKultra programme. He participated in the MKultra torture to which Russian agent Yuri Nosenko was subjected beyond reasonable doubt.

After being tortured, CIA agent Nosenko was placed in the witness protection programme and disappeared. It is reasonable to assume that Russian and CIA agents jointly developed a MKultra programme on both sides of the Iron Curtain. The Patrice Lumumba University in Moscow could have piloted the Russian Mkultra-like project.

Yuri Nosenko agent might have been a key link between the American MKultra program and a possible Russian MKultra like program. Witnesses speak of children involved in these torture programs as were those of the Family cult in which the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange was allegedly raised.

We therefore call upon the judicial bodies of sovereign governments to investigate whether there have indeed been two mind control programs, with partial or intense cooperation between security agencies of the USSR and the USA, whether there has been any exchange or sharing of children, whether these children were stolen from sovereign countries other than the USSR and the USA. It should also be determined what these children were used for and what became of them. Could they have served as "Manchurian candidates" or served during the Vietnam War under Agent Buckley.

CIA Agent William Buckley, who was unable to protect President Anouar el Sadate from his criminals, is said to have died after unspeakable torture at the hands of Dr. Aziz Al Aboub on behalf of the Hezbollah. William Buckley was a seasoned agent. The way he was set up by the Hezbollah is barely credible. An agent does not travel alone, sending his driver away while he is bringing sensitive documents, especially in a state as unstable as Lebanon at war. There are signs that agent Buckley was an embarrassing witness having been made to disappear.

In 1967, Agent Buckley allegedly produced a report against American soldiers following the extraction of a Vietnamese soldier's heart by an American doctor. The report would have been closed without further action.

We therefore call on the judicial authorities of sovereign countries to open an investigation to shed light on the death of Agent William Buckley, his involvement in the MKultra programme and the assassination of Anouar El Sadate, his involvement in the torture of Agent Yuri Nosenko and the disappearance of the latter in the witness protection programme.

We request the US government to kindly provide the courts of sovereign countries with images of the torture inflicted by Dr. Aziz el Aboub on Agent William Buckley. We ask the leaders of the Hezbollah to give their version of the facts. No claim for the death of William Buckley seems to have been officially made by the Hezbollah leadership.

►   Disturbing disappearance of Sarah Harrisson

Sarah Harrison joined the team of the "04 Wikileaks" project as a collaborator of Julian Assange in July 2010. She is supposed to come from the Center for Investigative Journalism but the activity reports of the CIJ Charity and CIJ Company from 2003 to 2020 never mention her name.

Mark Davis' film "Inside Wikileaks" shows her in the role of project manager of "Wikileaks" publications, while Julian Assange promoted the project in the media. She was very close to Julian Assange with whom she worked daily as shown in the press conferences of 25 October 2010 and 4 November 2010, the photos taken by the press in front of the Westminster Court in December 2010 and February 2011, as well as the testimonies of eyewitnesses such as the author of the "Unauthorised Biography" of Julian Assange, Andrew O’Hagan.

Laura Poitras' film "Risk" shows Sarah Harrison as a companion of Julian Assange. It also shows her role as manager of the "Wikileaks" project in July 2012 when Julian Assange enters into captivity in the flat at 3 Hans Crescent Street in London. Sarah Harrison is shown by the media as a collaborator of Edward Snowden from June to September 2013.

Subsequently the German media wrote that Sarah Harrison would live in Germany from 2014. She is credited as having headed the "Courage Foundation" from 2014 to April 2017, while the Wau Holland Stiftung creates a "whistleblower support" project Zivilcourage. Wau Holland Stiftung's directors must know Sarah Harrison since they are the directors of the WikiLeaks project for which she worked but her name is not inscribed in their public documents. In May 2016 she appears in video at a colloquium at the Université Libre de Bruxelles about Julian Assange, and on 4th of June 2016 at a European Parliament meeting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxvltfJ_kVc

https://geoffroydelagasnerie.com/2016/05/28/lart-de-la-fuite-seminaire-sur-laffaire-assange-et-wikileaks-le-30-mai-a-luniversite-libre-de-bruxelles/

She has since disappeared. It is not possible to contact her, write her or see her. No one from Julian Assange's former entourage seems to know where she is. The media announce her withdrawal from the "Courage Foundation" in April 2017, but the last picture that shows her is a photo from 8 December 2010 at the Gavin MacFadyen tribute ceremony organised by the Centrer for Investigate Journalism at Goldsmith University in London. Since then there are no more photos or information about her.

https://twitter.com/cijournalism/status/80692807921820876

►   Disturbing disappearance of Rodney Wayne Lomax, aka Prime Suspect

The characters Mendax (Liar in latin), Anthrax and Prime suspect appear in Suellette Dreyfus' novel Underground. We remind you that Edward Snowden is also known as Verax (Who speaks the truth in Latin).

Since the existence of these characters and their exploits seems to be attested only in Skeleton Dreyfus' book, we ask the judicial authorities of sovereign governments to kindly determine the official identities of each of them, to locate them and to kindly ask them to testify in the Assange case.

Rodney Lomax, aka Prime Suspect, allegedly made contact with the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange while he was sequestered in the building at 3 Hans Crescent.

Since then, Rodney Lomax, aka Prime Suspect, seems to have disappeared.

We therefore request the judicial authorities of the sovereign countries to please open an investigation to determine where Rodney Lomax is and whether he is still alive.

In addition, Rodney Lomax aka Prime Suspect is connected to the Australian criminal case Family Murder. Alan Barnes, one of the victims, is alleged to have been a friend of his. He is pictured next to Assange on his Twitter account above.

The Family Murder case refers to torture practices of the Mkultra type as in the Assange type.

We therefore urge the judicial authorities of sovereign countries to reopen the investigation into the crime of Alan Barnes and the other victims of the Family Murder case.

Family Murder and Alan Barnes

https://unresolved.me/the-family-murders/

https://blogs.mediapart.fr/edition/liberez-assange-ethiques-et-medias/article/070919/julian-assange-gathering-citizen

https://www.facebook.com/rodney.lomax.71

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Family_Murders

https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/lost-diary-gives-south-australia-police-new-lead-into-alan-barnes-murder-by-the-family/news-story/eaf66c4823f20f55981177c02d2bb657

https://crimestopperssa.com.au/case/alan-arthur-barnes/

https://fletchermarple.com/post/185756324799/the-family-murders-between-1979-and-1983-the

https://www.facebook.com/295563197769474/posts/on-monday-18-june-1979-alan-barnes-aged-17-years-was-reported-missing-by-his-mot/334344420558018/

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/the-family-murders.983092/

https://www.pedestrian.tv/podcast/family-murders-adelaide-unsolved/

https://murderpedia.org/male.V/v/von-einem-bevan.ht
mhttps://www.reddit.com/r/UnresolvedMysteries/comments/g8bbob/adelaides_family_murders_only_one_man_has_been/

https://www.perthnow.com.au/news/sa/ross-barnes-a-relative-of-family-murder-victim-alan-barnes-reported-missing-in-adelaide-ng-ea7ba8298091f38ba64fe57b2dd35a48

https://www.academia.edu/1475/

The_search_for_finality_Serial_killing_the_narration_of_sexual_injury_and_the_promise_of_consolation

►   False writing, forgery and defraud

►   Corruption, judiciary corruption and political corruption

►   Misappropriation of public property and misappropriation of funds

►   Breach of trust

►   Human Trafficking

►   Transnational Organized Crime

►    Violation of the Munich Charter

►    Disclosure of false information

►    Propaganda

►    Defamation

►    Violation of labour laws

►    Violation of image rights

►    False testimony

We, WikiJustice Julian Assange association for the Defence of Human Rights (WJJA), file a complaint addressed to the English, USA and German Courts, and to the judiciary Courts of the sovereign countries which ratified the Universal Declaration of Human Rights against :

►   An extra-constitutionnel and extra-territorial state that violates the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, all the texts related to human rights and the UN Charter.

This illegal state is denounced in a complaint by the government of the United States of America, District of Columbia : Criminal Action No. 20-165-JEB / United States ofAmerica v. KEVIN CLINESMITH. It produces the testimony of Christopher Earl Strunk.

Like the sovereign government of the United States of America, we suspect this extra-constitutional and extra-territorial State of circumventing international laws and violating fundamental human rights by using private entities, tax and legal havens under feudal law and the Navigation Act of 1660.

These private entities belong to the Crown of England and are managed by the family known as Mountbatten-Windsor and in particular by Charles known as Charles of Wales. Some of them are called Dominions. The central power of this extra-constitutional and extra-territorial state seems to lie in the Virginia City of London, aka City of London, possession of the Crown of England, matter of feudal law and the Navigation Act of 1660.

The Virginia City of London and the Crown of England were involved in the Assange case, notably through the City of London and the Old Bailey (See below). Because of a legal vacuum concerning the management of the possessions of the English crown, the State of Virginia of the United States of America remains subservient to the City of London by the Navigation Act of 1660.

However, if the State of Virginia is subservient to the City of London, it means that all American institutions, the Pentagon, the Congregation, the Federal Bank and the White House are also subservient to the City of London. This state of affairs is detrimental to the sovereignty of the United States of America which loses all sovereignty and is no longer a subject of International Law as long as the legal vacuum remains.

Furthermore, it is legitimate for the sovereign countries, subject to International Rights, to ask themselves who rules the United States of America: the sovereign state of the United States of America or the extra-constitutional and extra-territorial state in connection with the City of London, the Crown of England and the Dominions. Either the United States of America is a centralized sovereign state with Federal States under its control, subject to international law, or it is a conglomerate of private entities under the domination of an extra-constitutional and extra-territorial state whose governance seems to be localized in the City of London.

If it is the second hypothesis that prevails, none of USA actions has legality from the point of view of international law. They are not subject to international law.

They can't subject to international law. Only a sovereign country can be. From a territorial point of view, since each state is a private entity, none of them have no legality from a constitutional point of view, neither of international law, since it does not participate in the management of the central state and that, more, none this central state, none federal state are defined by the American constitution. What laws do the federal states obey if they do not belong to a sovereign state that centralizes powers and homogenizes laws?

Who runs the United States? A sovereign state with a president at its head or an extra-constitutional and extra-territorial state based in the City of London? This legal vacuum is of unprecedented seriousness because it places the United States of America outside international law and makes it lose all legitimacy. It is the open door to all violations of laws, national and international, to a secede between states or to war. This legal vacuum threatens the geopolitical balances and the sovereignty of all other sovereign countries. (See demonstration below)

►   We therefore call upon the sovereign government of the United States of America and the sovereign states of the world to open as soon as possible an investigation to determine who rules the different states of America, an extra-constitutional and extra-territorial state whose governance would be in the City of London, in the hands of the Crown of England and its allies, or sovereign governors of different federal states subject to central sovereign governance whose center of command would be the White House, its président and the Congress, respecting a same constitution.

►   If we are asking the governments of sovereign states to jointly open an investigation with USA government into this extra-constitutional and extra-territorial state, it is not to infringe on the sovereignty of the United States of America and its citizens, but on the contrary to help their regain it by law.

Many institutions of sovereign states seem to have been colonized by this extra-constitutional and extra-territorial state. Only an alliance of world jurisdictions will be able to defeat this extra-constitutional and extra-territorial state without resorting to an armed war.

►   We request the heads of sovereign states, guarantors of fundamental human rights and the sovereignty of their countries, to jointly open an investigation to identify the leaders and members of the extra-constitutional and extra-territorial state, in connection with the City of London and the Moutbatten-Windsor family, in order to dismantle it because it is not subject to international law and has not been validated by the citizens who have become its subjects in spite of themselves.

►   We ask the heads of sovereign states, guarantors of fundamental human rights and the sovereignty of their countries, to create an official legal status in accordance with international law to the Dominions and other private entities owned by the Crown of England.

►   We call upon the sovereign American government and the sovereign heads of state to jointly initiate an investigation to determine whether the extra-constitutional and extra-territorial state in relation to the City of London and the Crown of England is not involved in the American electoral fraud. Too much evidence of this fraud has been brought to the attention of the general public. No democratic country can and should tolerate electoral fraud.

If the United States courts refuse to open an investigation because they would be in headed by the extra-territorial and extra-constitutional state against which this complaint is made, it is vital that a coalition of sovereign countries' courts conduct this investigation. U.S. citizens have the right to access the truth, guaranteed by the First Amendment to their Constitution, and the right to hold a new election, with peace of mind, if fraud is proven.

►   We call on sovereign states to open an investigation to determine whether this extra-constitutional and extra-territorial state is not involved in Operation Covid 19, which appears to serve a high level financial scam involving the sale of the assets of sovereign countries to private entities whose nature remains to be discovered. Where ever they occur, this abuse of public property amounts to treason.

Operation Covid 19 allows for the confiscation of institutions outside any legal framework by establishing terror through coercive measures, amounting to torture, on civilian populations (wearing masks, confinement, etc.) and through genocide on targeted populations, particularly in retirement homes, in France by Revotril, amounting to a crime against humanity.

►   The citizen known as Stella Morris, aka Stella or Sara Gonzalez Devant, aka Stella Morris Robertson, aka…?

►   Margaret Tatcher who was involved in many cases, her government and those that followed, Theresa May and the management and staff of English government

►   The management and staff of Belmarsh Prison

►   The Management and Staff of SERCO

A Part of Belmarsh Prison, the Thameside Prison, Griffin Manor Road London, SE28 0F, is run by the private Serco group which also provides private transfer of prisoners. Julian Assange was taken with a Serco van to 181 Marylebone Road on the 3 occasions that eyewitnesses were able to see him - on 21 October 2019, 20 December 2019 and 13 January 2020.

Serco was also seen by witnesses bringing prisoners to the Old Bailey on September 7, 8 and 9.

Julian Assange had shown the 3 times we have seen him a great fear of these militia men in a private company who keep him in detention.

On the other hand, Serco is involved in rape cases. Women detained at the Yarl's Wood Immigration Centre made 6 allegations of sexual assault against staff. The assaults are alleged to have taken place between 2013 and 2015 at the centre, which is run by Serco in Bedfordshire.

It is therefore legitimate to wonder if the Serco company is not involved in a rendition system as well as in the incommunicado incarceration and torture of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange.

We therefore request the legal authorities of the sovereign government of Great Britain to open an investigation to determine whether SERCO is not a private entity working for those who persecute or allow the persecution of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange and is not a militia in the service of private interests.

We request the legal authorities of the sovereign government of Great Britain to open an investigation into the rapes committed in the centers and prisons run by SERCO and to determine whether there are other victims.

About SERCO

https://www.serco.com/

https://www.serco.com/about/the-board-and-governance/plc-board-director-profil
ehttps://spacestor.com/insights/industry-trends/talent-talks-with-kirsty-bashforth-ways-of-working/

https://www.biduk.org/posts/437-hidden-histories-yarl-s-wood-and-its-captive-women

https://leftfootforward.org/2020/02/theres-been-decades-of-abuse-at-a-serco-detention-centre-so-why-has-it-been-given-another-contract/

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-36804714

►   The citizen known as Judge Baraitser, named by the media Vanessa Baraitser

►  Judge Emma Aburthnot

►  Judges Duncan Ouseley, Howard Riddle, judge Snow and judge Tanweer Ikram and all judicial personnel from all countries who worked on the Assange case for conducting false extradition proceedings against a citizen being prosecuted under a pseudonym and thus referring to illegal documents. The European Warrant was issued by the Swedish judicial authorities under the pseudonym Julian Paul Assange and not under the birth name of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange, whose birth name has yet to be determined. This arrest warrant has no legal value. None of the documents issued against the pseudonym of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange has any legal value. All the judges and judicial bodies in charge of the Assange case, regardless of their country, have conducted illegal proceedings by validating false documents.

►  Barak Obama, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton and the management and staff of US Government

►   The management and staff of US Democrats in link with Assange case and all offenses in link with the Assange case

►  Andy Müller Maguhn, Klaus Schleisieck, Bernd Fix, Jens Ohlig, Winfried Motzkus and Wau Holland Stiftung

►  The management and staff of Chaos Computer Club

►   The management and staff of Courage Foundation, Nathan Fuller, Sarah Harrison and Naomi Colwin

►  Sevim Dagdelem, Heike Hänsel and The management and staff of Die Linke in link with Assange case and all offenses in link with the Assange case

►   Angela Merkel and the management and staff of German government

►  The citizen known as John Shipton owner of the domain names of Wikileaks.org and collateralmurder.wikileaks.org

►   Kristinn Hrafnsson, Ron Gonggrip, Ingi Ragnar Ignason, Gudmundur Ragnar Gudmundson, Nadia H, Karl Neptunus, Jenny Lee, P.L., Smari mac Carthy, Borgnyr Thoroddsen, Marie S, Daniel Schmitt, Gottfrid Svartholm, Jérémy Zimmerman and all management and staff of Sunshine Press Production

►  Fredrik Neij, Gottfrid Swartholm, Carl Lundstrom, Peter Sunde and Pirate Bay

►  Birgitta Jonsdottir and the management and staff of Pirate Party in link with Assange case and all offenses in link with the Assange case

►  Suelette Dreyfus

►  The citizen known as Anna Ardin, aka Svea Anna Carolina Ardin, aka Anna Bernadin, the citizen known as Sofia Wilen, Seth Benson,

►    The management and staff of Christian democrats of Sweden in link with Assange case and all offenses in link with the Assange case

►   Anna Ardin and Sofia Wilen

►  Marianne Ny, Maria Haljebo Kjellstrand, Ingrid Isgren, Thomas Bodstrom, Elisabeth Massi Fritz, Irmeli Krans, Niklas Swenson, and the management and staff of Sweden gouvernment

►  Niklas Svenson

►  The City of London administration. Executive Director of Mansion House and Central Criminal Court, Vic Annells. The Mayor of the City of London William Russell. The two sheriffs Michael Mainelli and Christopher Hayward.

►  The management and staff of the Old Bailey

►  The management and staff of the Westminster Court

►  The citizen known as Rosie Silvester and the management and staff of Security company Mitie. The citizen known as Julian Paul Assange was afraid of some of Mitie's employees. Several of our delegates and our doctors witnessed the fearful manifestations of Mr. Julian Paul Assange.

►  The management and staff of Imperial college of London Saint Marys’ Hospital

►    The management and staff of CIJ (Center for Investigative Journalism): Joseph Farrell, Suzan Benn, Caroline Nevejan, Isabel Hilton, Andy Müller Maguhn, Eyal Weizman, Finlay Dobbie, Becky Gardiner, Gill Philipps, Iona Craig, Barbara Bukovska, Martin Tomkinson, Elaine Potter, Michael Langley, Christopher Hird, Brian Basham, David Leigh, James Leigh, Gavin Miller, Josephine Glanville, Sami Akhine, Juliet Ferguson, Jake Charles Rees, Marina Calland, Tom Sanderson, Tom Sanderson.

►   The management and staff of the of The Chase Manhattan Bank, Lloyds Bank, Commerzbank Kassel

►   The management and staff of the Bertha Foundation and Anthony Selwyn Tabatznik known as Tony Tabatznik

►   Rafael Correa Delgado, Lenin Moreno, Ricardo Paturo Aroca, Guillaume Long, Andrés Fernando Hidalgo Bautista (Director of Documentation and Archive Management), Jorge Vantroi Moreno Fierro (Consul of Ecuador in London), Juan Fernando Salazar Granja (General coordinator of legal advice), Jose Luis Jacome Guerrero (Deputy minister for human mobility), Jorge Oswaldo Troya Fuertes (Directorate-General for Civil Status, Identification and Registration), Maria Auxiliadora Mosquera Real (General co-ordinator of legal advice, in charge), Santiago Javier Chavez Parera (Deputy minister for human mobility), Byron Rolando Suarez Sanchez (Minister for Foreign Affairs and Human Mobility, deputy), Maria Fernanda Espinosa Garcès (Minister for Foreign Affairs and Human Mobility, deputy), Carlos Abad (Ecuador's Ambassador to the United Kingdom), Fidel Narvaez, Maria Eugenia Avilés, Cathy Ward, and the management and staff of Ecuadorian government and Ecuadorian Embassy.

All the people named above appear on the asylum application and naturalisation documents of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange. Lenin Moreno violated the Geneva Conventions by withdrawing political asylum from Julian Assange through an arbitrary act.

What has been given by the law can only be defeated by judgment and by law. Consequently, the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange still enjoys political asylum.

►   The management and staff of Santiniketan park Association, the Great White Brotherhood, the Family Cult and other sects that could be linked to the Assange affair such as scientology, Black Sun, or organisations such as Fabian Society, etc.

►   The management and staff of Australian Government

►   The Crown of England : Philippe de Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg, aka Philippe of Moutbatten; Elisabeth II, aka Elizabeth Alexandra Mary of Windsor, aka Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Bowes Lyon, his mother's name, the only identifiable name; Charles Philip Arthur George of Wales whose presumed name is Charles Philip Arthur George Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg; Anne presumed born Anne Elizabeth Alice Louise Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg, first husband Mark Philipps, second husband Thimothy James Laurence Hamilton so now known as Anne Elizabeth Alice Louise Laurence Hamilton; Andrew Albert Christian Edward of York whose presumed name is Andrew Albert Christian Edward Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg, aka Andrew Inverness, aka Air Miles Andy, aka "His Buffoon Highness", according to some of our informants, aka Andrew Hamilton; Edward Antony Richard Louis of Wessex, presumed name Edward Antony Richard Louis Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg; William William Arthur Philip Louis of Cambridge, presumed name William Arthur Philip Louis Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg, Henry Charles Albert David of Sussex, aka Prince Harry, aka Toby Melvill, presumed name Henry Charles Albert David Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg; and all members of the alleged Mountbatten Windsor family.

Prince Andrew pseudonym

https://www.euroweeklynews.com/2019/12/14/top-newsprince-andrew-used-fake-name-to-set-up-firm-with-tycoon/https://www.msn.com/en-nz/news/world/revealed-how-prince-andrew-used-pseudonym-to-set-up-a-secret-firm-with-a-sports-tycoon-who-organised-2001-thailand-trip-during-which-duke-was-spotted-on-yacht-with-topless-women/ar-AAK7sfy

https://m.facebook.com/blockEUfee/posts/2636722893215272

Pseudonym of Prince Harry aka Toby Melvill

https://static1.businessinsider.com/prince-harry-hates-twitter-2014-7

In the presumed royal family is called Mountbatten Windsor, it's a bit like in the Assange family, no one is named Mountbatten Windsor.

We remind you that no title can be used as a birth name. The lineage is transmitted by the family name, therefore by the name of birth, generally attached to the initial feudal fiefdom.

Several families are eligible for the English crown: the descendants of the Stuart family, the Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg and the Oldenburg family.

Identity and political legitimacy

The identity of any sovereign is crucial to ensure his/her legitimacy. Identity is based on the transmission of the family name. In patrilineal European societies the name is transmitted by the father to the children (the mother's name is transmitted in the father's absence or by exception).

The name is an identity fixed at birth and cannot be changed other than by a court decision and for Princess Alice of Battenberg, just among the righteous important political and social reasons. Any use in public life of a name other than the bequeathed name misleads the interlocutor. In the case of persons with political responsibilities, the arbitrary use of a name other than that bequeathed by the family can be assimilated to fraud, deception with serious consequences for society as a whole.

The names of current British sovereigns who are also heads of state of the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth states are questionable and this has important political consequences not only for the citizens of these states, but given Britain's role as a world power (nuclear power, member of the UN Security Council and founding member of the UN) this situation is detrimental to the people of Europe and to world balance and peace.

Indeed, the name Windsor - Mountbatten has no historical legitimacy. It is an artificial name created in 1917.

The family occupying the throne of England, the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth is a German family, von Sachsen Coburg Gotha.

George von Sachsen Coburg Gotha, father of Queen Elizabeth, is the great-grandson of Queen Victoria Sachsen Coburg Gotha, born Sachsen Coburg Saalfeld and von Braunschweig Lüneburg Calenberg (also called House of Hannover) and of Albert von Sachsen Coburg Gotha, husband of Victoria Sachsen Coburg Saalfeld Braunschweig Calenberg. These original fiefdom names, which in the case of noble families become surnames, shot that the royal family of England is a family of German origin (today's Land Hesse and Thuringia for Coburg).

Victoria von Sachsen Coburg Gotha is also the niece of Leopold I, the first king of the Belgians, in fact Leopold von Sachsen Coburg Saalfeld, her mother's brother. Victoria von Sachsen Coburg Gotha is considered to be the founder of the British monarchy in its present form. She came to power in 1837 thanks to exceptional circumstances (no male heir from the Braunschweig Lüneburg family) and the support of her uncle Lepold von Sachsen Coburg Saalfeld. His son Edward became King of Great Britain from 1901 to 1910. This son's son - George - became King from 1910 to 1936 and changed the original name of Sachsen Coburg Gotha to Windsor.

Married to Mary von Teck, George V von Sachsen Coburg Gotha was the father of Edward VIII, King of Great Britain who abdicated in 1937 for both personal and political reasons - his support for Nazi Germany is known to historians. His son Albert became George VI from 1937 to 1952. Albert von Sachsen Coburg Gotha married in 1923 to Elisabeth Bowes Lyon should never have become king, it was the exceptional political circumstances of his brother's abdication that led him to be the ruler in the troubled times of the British Resistance against the Nazis and the construction of the "New Jerusalem" after 1945 as well as the construction of the United Nations and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Albert von Sachsen Coburg Gotha should also have represented his country as head of state in the negotiations crucial for the future of Europe and humanity - the conferences in Teheran, Yalta, Podstam and Bretton Woods, with the negotiators of the other sovereign states having the rank of head of state. Albert von Sachsen Coburg Gotha was a member of Freemasonry because he was not expected to become Head of State, which may have influenced his way of governing - members of Freemasonry have bonds of brotherhood among themselves that transcend other class and family ties they may otherwise have. It would be important to know what role in British politics King George VI's adherence to Masonic principles played.

Elisabeth, the present Queen of the United Kingdom should bear the name of her father, von Sachsen Coburg und Gotha. Her children should bear the name of their father, Elisabeth's husband since 1947, Philipp von Battenberg, actually Philipp von Schleswig Holstein Sonderburg Lüneburg.

Philipp von Battenberg is the son of Alice von Battenberg and André King of Greece (actually André von Schleswig Holstein Lüneburg Glücksburg, a branch of the Oldenburg family). Alice de Battenberg is the daughter of Victoria von Darmstadt Hesse and Louis de Battenberg (actually Louis Darmstadt Hesse). Victoria von Darmstadt Hesse is the daughter of Alice, the second daughter of Queen Victoria and Louis von Hessen. Victoria von Darmstadt Hesse married Louis von Battenberg in 1884. Battenberg is a nickname given by the Russian Tsar Nicholas to Louis Battenberg's mother, the Pole Julia Hauke (married in 1851 to Alexander von Darmstadt Hesse, a natural and therefore legitimate son of the von Darmstadt Hesse family).

Alix von Darmstadt Hesse, sister of Victoria von Darmstadt Hesse, becomes Tsarina of Russia by marrying Nicholas II Romanov in 1894. She is executed together with her husband and children by the Russian Revolutionaries in 1918.
Victoria von Darmstadt Hesse marries Battenberg, who died in 1950 and is the great-grandmother of the heir to the present throne of the United Kingdom Charles. She knew him at the time of his birth.

Philipp of Mounbatten, the husband of Elizabeth II, who was called Prince Consort, has a nickname that conceals his true origins: his mother's name, Battenberg, is the nickname of his grandfather Louis Battenberg (actually Louis von Darmstadt Hesse). In keeping with the patrilineal nature of family transmission in Europe, Philipp Montbatten should have been called Philipp von Schleswig Holstein Sonderburg Lüneburg. His son Charles should then have been named either Charles von Battenberg (named after his grandmother Alice von Battenberg by Louis von Battenberg) or Charles von Schleswig Holstein Lüneburg Glücksburg (by his grandfather André from Greece, a member of this German-Danish family).

In any case it is not normal that the name of the future sovereign and head of state of the United Kingdom should be so uncertain and his German origin concealed from the eyes of British citizens as well as from world public opinion. Given Britain's importance in the concert of nations and the important political consequences this has for citizens in Europe and the world, and given the troubled history of Charles' father's family called Windsor.

His father Philippe Battenberg was taken from his mother Alice Battenberg at the age of 10, who was locked up in a psychiatric asylum for 10 years. Released, Alice von Battenberg returns to Greece where she takes part in the Anti-Nazi Resistance. She is the founder of an Orthodox religious order, she is Just Among the Nations. But she was never allowed to educate her children and influence their destiny. The father of Philipp, Andrew of Greece, died in troubles circumstances in France in 1944.

We ask that an investigation be opened to determine his precise name and precise filiation in order to shed light on his political legitimacy.
Philipp Battenberg did not pass on his name to his children and complained publicly about this. This raises a number of questions, given that in our European legal system filiation must be indisputable for the transmission of an heritage, especially when this heritage is important in terms of property and spiritual and political symbols. It should also be remembered that the King is also the head of the Church of England, but also the Tsar of Russia is the head of the Church of Russia.

We ask that an investigation be opened to determine his precise name and precise filiation in order to shed light on his political legitimacy.
Philipp Battenberg did not pass on his name to his children and complained publicly about this. This raises a number of questions, given that in our European legal system filiation must be indisputable for the transmission of an heritage, especially when this heritage is important in terms of property and spiritual and political symbols. It should also be remembered that the King is also the head of the Church of England, but also the Tsar of Russia is the head of the Church of Russia.

Now, through Alice von Battenberg, his grandmother, Charles known as « Windsor » is a possible heir to Russian royalty. Indeed, his paternal grandmother Alice von Battenberg is the daughter of Victoria von Darmstadt Hesse and Victoria is the sister of Alix von Darmstadt Hesse, the last Czarina of Russia, whose children and husband Nicholas Romanov were assassinated in 1918. The missing Romanov children were therefore Alice Battenberg's first cousins. Philipp von Battenberg and his descendants are the heirs to the legitimacy of Russian history and possible power (if the Russian people wished to re-establish a legitimate monarchy).

Through Andrew von Schleswig Holstein Lüneburg Glücksburg (known as Andreas of Greece), whose mother is Olga Constantinova Romanov, Phlipp von Battenberg's children are also the direct grandchildren of the Romanovs. This double heritage means that Charles so-called of Windsor can claim the spiritual, historical and possibly political heritage of the Russian state and people on an equal footing with the other branches of the Romanov family, the heirs of the 6 sons of Xenia de Romanov (sister of Tsar Nicholas II), saved from the turmoil of the Bolshevik revolution, but scattered throughout France, Great Britain and the United States.  Xenia Romanov's descendants were also stripped of their property.

The nationalisations carried out by the revolutionaries took away his real estate, but his jewellery passed into foreign hands. The French branch of the Romanov family considered itself wronged by the "Windsor" Sachsen Coburg Gotha family because it was the family reigning in the United Kingdom, Georges V and Mary de Teck, who recovered the jewels from the Russian royal family. Why this historical, symbolic and political Russian family heritage, currently in the hands of Elisabeth and Charles "Windsor", find itself in their undue possession.

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenia_Alexandrovna_de_Russie

www.passion-histoire.net/viewtopic.php?f=88&t=9787

The Russian royalist sources are attached to the person of Philipp of Battenberg, but do not give any symbolic, spiritual legitimacy to Charles "Windsor", who is supposed to be his son. Why?

http://lizotchka-russie.over-blog.com/article-le-duc-philip-d-edimbourg-les-romanov-et-pouchkine-59821419.html

https://www.thevintagenews.com/2019/04/09/mountbatten-and-romanova/

Furthermore, Charles "Windsor" is currently playing a leading role in the "Grand Reset" operation led by the World Economic Forum in Davos, a "global governance" operation that powerful political forces not controlled by sovereign and democratic states want to impose on all the peoples of the world. The identity and legitimacy of this man to play this role must be questioned for the good of humanity, but his legitimacy in the United Kingdom's power system must be analysed and questioned, given his identity and his uncertain filiation.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/world-economic-forum-step-two-resetting-future-work-agenda-after-great-reset/5729175

We remind you that it is illegal to sign official papers under a pseudonym. Prince Andrew must run his businesses, sign official papers and have a passport under his birth name.

We request the judicial bodies of the sovereign government of the United Kingdom and the judicial bodies of sovereign countries to investigate the names of the lineages of citizens who call themselves Mountbatten Windsor and are known only by their titles.

We request the judicial bodies of the sovereign government of the United Kingdom and the judicial bodies of sovereign countries to investigate whether the name Mountbatten Windsor has been registered in the English civil registers and whether citizens have been registered under that name at birth.

We call on the judicial bodies of the sovereign government of the United Kingdom and the judicial bodies of sovereign countries to open an enquiry to ensure that no lineage of heirs to the Crown of England has been subject to spoliation, usurpation of function.

We call on the judicial bodies of the sovereign government of the United Kingdom and the judicial bodies of sovereign countries to open an enquiry to ensure that none of the members of any of the heir lines of the Crown of England are held hostage by private entities.

It is important that the judicial bodies of the sovereign government of Great Britain answer these questions because the Crown of England owns the City of London and also the Imperial College, two private entities involved in violations of laws, human rights and, concerning Imperial College, in the Covid-19 crisis followed by worldwide violation of laws (See explanations and documents below).

https://www.goodhousekeeping.com/life/a20083318/prince-george-full-name-royals/

►   The management and staff of the UC Global

►   Sheldon Adelson and the management and staff of Sands Corporation

►   Robert James Woolsey and the management and staff of Booz Allen Hamilton

►   The management and staff of the Carlyle Group

►   All management and staff of US governments since Lyndon B Johnson

►   Alan Dershowitz, Baltazar Garzon, the citizen known as Jennifer Robinson, Mark Summers, Gareth Peirce, Alaistar Lyon, Amal Clooney, Geoffrey Robertson, Edward Fitzgerald, Liam Walker, Renata Avila, Per Samuelson, Juan Branco, Barry J. Pollack, Margaret Ratner Kunstler, Melinda Taylor, Deborah Hrbek, Greg Burns, James D Catlin, Bjorn Hurting, Leif Silbersky, Monckton Chamber, Paul Galbally, Eric Dupond Moretti, Antoine Vey, Héléna Ann Kennedy of Kershaw, Philippe Sands. There are reportedly 126 lawyers, but we have only managed to identify this group.

►   The management and staff of the International medias who, in violation of the Munich Charter, propagated fanciful stories and not source and verified their informations, lied, resorted to defamation and slander, confused the profession of journalist with that of advertiser or propagandist, accepted interference from governments or private entities.

We recall that media managers and journalists have a duty to defend freedom of information under the Munich Charter, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, in the USA, the First Amendment, and the Fundamental UE Charter of Fundamental Human Rights.

By misleading the public, by not disseminating vital information, they have violated the basic laws of democracy and seriously harmed the interests of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange. Today, the life of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange is in great danger.

The media by telling nonsense, by withholding information are responsible for the injustices, incarceration incommunicado and torture he has suffered.

►   Twitter, FaceBook and You Tube for censorship. Our twitter account has been closed twice without any justification having been given to us. However, we have asked Twitter to justify itself, but to date we have received no response. Our account is therefore still suspended without legal justification. On You Tube, it is impossible for us to post comments underneath the videos. Again, no valid explanation has been given. Moreover, the opacity of You Tube, as well as that of Twitter, makes any comprehension, conciliation or complaint procedure impossible.

►   Rebecca Vincent, Christian Mihr, Christophe Deloire, management and staff of Reporters without borders

►    The management and staff of Amnesty International

►   The management and staff of UN for violation of fundamental human rights and UN Charter in connection with the management of the Pact on Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration

►   The management and staff of WHO for its management of the Covid 19 Crisis in violation of fundamental human rights which are inalienable.

About WHO director : Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus

https://www.genocidewatch.com/single-post/2017/07/24/An-Open-Letter-to-Dr-Tedros-Adhanom-Ghebreyesus-Director-General-of-the-UN’s-World-Health-Organization

https://lesobservateurs.ch/2020/04/22/bill-gates-a-installe-un-terroriste-genocidaire-a-la-tete-de-loms/

https://www.tesfanews.net/gangster-who-head-tedros-adhanom/

https://www.europereloaded.com/is-w-h-o-director-tedros-a-terrorist-global-ties-to-gates-clinton-fdn-fauci-china-genocide/

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/china-helped-put-man-charge-world-health-organization—-it-paying-136002

https://lecourrier.vn/des-leaders-du-monde-sengagent-a-accelerer-le-developpement-doutils-nbsp/777067.html

https://www.politico.eu/article/tedros-adhanom-ghebreyesus-gives-who-a-headache/

https://www.politico.eu/article/tedros-adhanom-ghebreyesus-gives-who-a-headache

Julian Paul Assange SOS

We have a duty to lodge a complaint because Mr Julian Paul Assange does not have the possibility to express himself and has sent an SOS to one of the doctors of our association.

If we don't file a complaint, we will be violating the duty to rescue and the golden rule which requires everyone to do everything possible to save a citizen in danger.

What our delegates found when attending the hearings or trying to get in touch with the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange

Our delegates attended almost all of the procedural hearings to which Mr. Julian Assange is subject. They can testify that:

• Julian Paul Assange rights to express and defend himself are violated.
  

Hearing 13012020: Face to face with Julian Assange

Véronique Pidancet Barrière’s Testimony, president of the Human Rights Association WJJA, on the state of fear of Mr. Julian Assange during the hearings.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/hearing-13012020-face-julian-assange-pidancet-barrière-véronique/

Medical reports Political prisoner Julian Paul Assange. Julian Assange is being tortured in United Kingdom.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/wjja-third-medical-report-julian-assange-being-véronique/

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/wjja-second-medical-report-political-prisoner-julian-paul-véronique/

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/rapport-médical-du-prisonnier-politique-julian-paul-par-véronique/

Psychological torture originally developed by the Nazis. Nils Melzer. UN. 2020.

https://youtu.be/XsXSOo8umh8

No official document signed by any responsible civil servant of the United Kingdom, proving that Mr Julian Paul Assange is detained in any UK prison, has ever been published. Hence, the situation is equivalent to the fact that the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange is incarcerated incommunicado.

It is impossible to get in touch with the citizen known as Julian Assange, to obtain visitation rights, to call him on the phone or to converse with him by e-mail.

The citizen known as Julian Paul Assange cannot get in touch with anyone (XX). However, he has the right to request the support of a human rights association such as WJJA and to see a doctor of his choice. This is written in the prison regulations published by the UN.

There are doubts about where the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange is being held prisoner. He could have been renditioned or be held hostage by a private sect type entity. That Mr. Julian Paul Assange is most of the time present by video link which are not filmed in the same places. Uniforms of the guards change from one video to another.

Some people are present next to Mr. Julian Paul Assange. It is clear that he is afraid of them and that he cannot express himself freely. This is contrary to the rules of fair trial and habeas corpus. Where is Julian Assange being held incommunicado in the UK? If it is in Belmarsh, it means that the prison management does not respect human rights laws in prisons. There is every reason to believe that there may have been a rendition up to eleven years ago.

Reports of WikiJustice on the trial of Julian Assange

7 - 9 September 2020

http://monika-karbowska-liberte-pour-julian-assange.ovh/index.php/2020/09/23/elements-on-the-installation-of-a-dictatorship-in-europe-julian-assange-at-the-old-bailey-september-7-to-10-2020/

http://monika-karbowska-liberte-pour-julian-assange.ovh/index.php/2020/09/23/julian-assange-julian-assange-in-front-of-the-family-at-the-old-bailey-on-september-9-2020/

14 August 2020

http://monika-karbowska-liberte-pour-julian-assange.ovh/index.php/2020/08/15/hearing-of-julian-assange-on-14-august-westminster-court-turns-into-kindergarten-nursery-school/

27 July 2020

http://monika-karbowska-liberte-pour-julian-assange.ovh/index.php/2020/07/28/scripted-chaos-julian-assange-appears-at-the-westminster-magistrate-court-on-monday-27-july-2020/

24-27 Februar 2020

http://www.defenddemocracy.press/proces-de-wikileaks-ou-proces-de-julian-assange/

19 Februar 2020

http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=28167

23 January 2020

http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=28000

13 January 2020

http://www.librairie-tropiques.fr/2020/01/jualian-assange-remonter-de-la-dark-place-a-la-lumiere.html

13 January 2020

Analyse of Véronique Pidandet Barrière president of Wikijustice Julian Assange

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/hearing-13012020-face-julian-assange-pidancet-barrière-véronique/

19 , 20 December 2019

http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=27727

13 December 2019

http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=27661

18 November 2019

http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=27540

21 October 2019

http://tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=27400

https://www.defenddemocracy.press/comment-traverser-les-murs-de-la-dark-place-a-une-rencontre-incroyable/

Analyses Véronique Pidancet Barrière

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/extradition-trial-julian-assange-fake-private-court-owned-véronique/?published=t

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/pane-surprises-listening-lips-high-above-silence-im-your-véronique/

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/situation-report-1-political-prisoner-julian-assange-véronique/

Monika Karbowska

http://monika-karbowska-liberte-pour-julian-assange.ovh/index.php/2020/06/27/romantic-end-to-the-julian-assange-case-objections-analyses-and-actions-of-wikijustice-part-1/

http://monika-karbowska-liberte-pour-julian-assange.ovh/index.php/2020/07/01/fin-de-partie-romantique-de-laffaire-julian-assange-2/

Rendition is the illegal act of surrendering a citizen to the CIA for incarceration in a secret prison.

The UK and Sweden are accused of making numerous renditions and of being involved in the torture of citizens who are victims.

Reed Allegation of UK Complicity in torture (House of Lords, House of commons joint commette of human Rights - 2008-2009), Detainee Mistreatment and Rendition (Intelligende and Security Comimitte of Parliament 2001-2010) and CIA Torture Unredacted, An investigation into the CIA Torture Programme (Sam Raphael, Crofton Black, Ruth Blakeley)

Extraordinary Renditions

https://www.therenditionproject.org.uk

https://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/rendition701/updates/updates.html

https://www.statewatch.org/observatories/rendition-the-use-of-european-countries-by-the-cia-for-the-transport-and-illegal-detention-of-prisoners/

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/apr/24/uk-public-money-fighting-libya-rendition-case-abdel-hakim-belhaj-fatima-boudchar

https://www.theguardian.com/law/2019/mar/31/police-investigating-role-of-uk-officers-in-torture-of-al-qaida-suspect

https://www.statewatch.org/news/2018/july/uk-true-scale-of-uk-role-in-torture-and-rendition-after-9-11-revealed-two-damning-reports-reveal-british-intelligences-treatment-of-terrorism-suspects/

https://www.antiwar.com/blog/2013/02/05/20-facts-about-extraordinary-rendition-torture-and-secret-detention/

https://monarchprogramming.wordpress.com/tag/cia-renditions-group/

https://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/rendition701/timeline/timeline_1.htm

All procedures are carried out under the usual name of Mr Julian Paul Assange and not under his birth name. They are therefore all illegal. All proceedings must be conducted under the birth name of the accused. Moreover, the identity of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange is not, to date, clearly established.

• All the hearings are staged and filmed by an unknown entity.

Director Marc Richard Hamilton, aka Hamish Hamilton, supervises some of the filming of the hearings. Who commissioned him? Marc Richard Hamilton, aka Hamish Hamilton, takes notes during the hearings as a director does during a film shoot. What is the purpose of his images?

Who uses them? Has the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange been asked to give his authorization as provided by the law on image rights? Why are unknown entities allowed to film and no one from outside Wikileaks? Are they allowed to film by sovereign UK Justice? Who issued the filming permits? We recall that the name Hamilton is that of the guru of the Family Cult known as Ann Hamilton Byrne, aka Grâce Victoria Edwards aka Evlyne Harris, aka Anna Riley.

http://monika-karbowska-liberte-pour-julian-assange.ovh/index.php/2020/09/23/elements-on-the-installation-of-a-dictatorship-in-europe-julian-assange-at-the-old-bailey-september-7-to-10-2020/Révolte à la Woolwich Court - Faire Vivre le PCF

About Ann Hamilton Byrne, aka Grâce Victoria Edwards aka Evlyne Harris, aka Anna Riley

https://wrldrels.org/2018/01/03/the-family/

https://www.famechain.com/family-tree/67278/anne-hamilton-byrne

https://www.rescuethefamily.com/blog-posts/reflections-on-the-death-of-anne-hamilton-byrne-on-thursday-13-june-2019

No incriminating or exculpatory debate takes place during the hearings. No prosecution or defence witnesses are called to testify, at least at the hearings we were able to attend. No charges of pseudo-prosecution are contemplated.

Defence lawyers do not plead. Who gave them a mandate? The citizen known as Julian Paul Assange? Why didn't they ask for an annulment in a mistrial? Who is Julian Paul Assange's legal team? Who pays for it? Many of these lawyers are not registered with the English Bar and therefore have no legitimacy in a courtroom. They cannot be the official lawyers of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange.

We recall that many citizens have generously donated money to WikiLeaks and the Courage Foundation so that the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange could benefit from the best lawyers. These citizens did not give their money to pay lawyers with links to the CIA or defending torture like Alan Dershowitz; or former judge Baltazar Garzon accused by tenth of Spanish autonomists to have covered up torture in his jurisdiction.

If the money collected by the Courage and Wikileaks Foundation is not used for the defence of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange, there is fraud, misappropriation, embezzlement and breach of trust.
We therefore call upon the justice of the sovereign government of the United Kingdom and the sovereign justice of the different nations’ governments to open an enquiry to determine to whom the raised funds have been allocated.

The « 07 Zivilcourage project » which appears in the 2014 activity report of the Wau Holland Stiftung can be identified with the « Courage Foundation » of which Andy Müller Maguhn, also President of the Wau Holland Stiftung, is a « director » and of which Julian Assange's friend and collaborator on the « 04 Wikileaks project » Sarah Harrison was the « president » until April 2017.

https://www.couragefound.org/tag/andy-muller-maguhn/

" 8. Project 07 : Civil Courage"

"The Project Area 07 was newly established in 2014 under the name "Zivil Courage" in order to pay special tribute to and, if necessary, support persons who have distinguished themselves in the sense of the Foundation's statutory objectives. In 2014, a small amount of travel expenses for participation in events was reimbursed here, also in order to make the activities of the Wau Holland Foundation in this area better known »-

http://www.wauland.de/media/2014_Jahresbericht.pdf

We put the words « president » and « director » in between quotes because there are serious doubts about the legal structure of this organisation, which neither has an address in any European country, nor does it provide any legal documents or publish any report on its activities.

The only contact is a form on the site and nobody ever replies to messages left. Wau Holland's annual report for 2015 does mention a «collaboration with the Courage Foundation in Great Britain (http://www.wauland.de/media/2015_Jahresbericht.pdf), but the only « Courage Foundation » in the register of associations in Great Britain deals with children and has nothing to do with whistleblowers.

The only address visible on the site is the one under the name of the bank to which donors are invited to send money: The Chase Bank in New York – « Bank Account Courage Corp, account number 000 000 83 87 31 689, BIC SWIFT code CHASUS 33, Routing number IBAN 021 000 21, Reference : Courage Foundation, bank address Chase Bank, 270 Park Avenue, New York, NY 100 17, USA. Recipient address: Courage Foundation, 201, Varick Street, PO. Box #766, New York , USA ».

https://www.couragefound.org/donate/

The address of the bank to which citizens are invited by Andy Müller Maguhn and other leaders to send their money to support Julian Assange and other whistleblowers is not in Europe, but in the United States, which can only come as a surprise, given that this country is particularly hostile to « Wikileaks » and is pursuing Julian Assange for criminal allegations. The recipient bank is the major American bank Chase Manhattan Bank and the address of the account of the « Courage Corp » is Park Avenue. But it gets worse: the mailing address of the Courage Foundation is 201 Varick Street in New York City, an office belonging to the US federal state in which the Immigration Court is located, but also the National Urban Security Technology Laboratory part of United States Department of Homeland Security !

https://www.justice.gov/eoir/new-york-varick-immigration-court

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Urban_Security_Technology_Laborator

Also the « Courage Foundation or Courage Found » was not found in the registers of German, French or British NGOs. But it does not exist in the registers of NGOs in New York State either. On the other hand, the « Courage Corp » does exist as a private company, a « Domestic Business Corporation », created on 30 May 2017 and registered under DOS ID number 5145362 in the New York Department of State Division of Corporation. The address of its registered office is that of its manager Nathan Fuller, 2790 Brodway, apt. 4D, 100 25, New York.

In the United States, as in Europe, the law obliges charitable organisations and non-governmental organisations that live from donations to submit their accounts to a supervisory authority and to make them public. Citizens' money must be used for the purpose stated in the legal statutes of these structures and the public must have the means to verify this. Any use of citizens' money for another purpose is an abuse of social good.

So what can be said about the maintenance of a private capitalist profit-making enterprise with citizens' money? This kind of practice is condemned by law and morals in our capitalist societies. A « business » must sell services and goods and cannot live on public charity.

The Courage Corp, its leaders and those who encourage donations to Courage Corp are thus committing an abuse of social good, perhaps even a scam by collecting donations from citizens who want to help whistleblowers. This is all the more serious as the US business entity Courage Corp masquerades as a charity, the Courage Foundation, an entity that in reality does not legally exist anywhere. It is time for the judicial authorities to remind the leaders of these structures, both Nathan Fuller in New York and Andy Müller-Maguhn in Germany to their responsbility.

Müller-Maguhn, who appeals to the generosity of European citizens to make donations to a private American business enterprise, cannot escape his legal responsibility, all the more so as he remains today a leading member of the Board of Directors of the Wau Holland Stiftung, a foundation with its headquarters in Hamburg, which is listed in the registers of foundations of the Free City of Hamburg

The hearings do not comply with any of the rules of legal procedure.

In the courtroom, seated at tables reserved for defence and prosecution lawyers, there are citizens who have no legitimacy because they have nothing to do with the trial. The activist MC Mc Grath for example. Some of these citizens are teenagers or very young adults. They play on their mobile phones or computers throughout the hearings.

Judge (Vanessa) Baraitser does not behave like a judge but like a school principal supervising a playground. These verbal interventions are never legal form. It is difficult to find any trace of Vanessa Baraitser on the WEB. She appears in the press, as a judge exclusively, first for a few minor cases, then in the Alexandre Djouri criminal case involving the French president Nicolas Sarkozy, whose brother Olivier Sarkozy was general director of the Carlyle Group from 2008 to 2016.

The Carlyle Group is the parent company of Booz Allen & Hamilton, headed by Robert James Woolsey, former director of the CIA, where Edward Snowden worked.

Other members of her family have public records : Michael Baraitser, Marion Baraitser, Alexandra Baraitser, Paula Baraitser and Lisa Baraitser.

In the complaint context, where paedocriminality and human trafficking issues proliferate, the company in which Paula Baraitser works can be questioning since she works in the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Health of the Royal College of obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

« Vanessa » judge Baraitser

Judge Baraitser appears at Julian Assange's hearing on 21 October and conducts all trial hearings until 1 October 2020. Judge Baraitser continuously violates the fundamental rights of prisoner Julian Assange and violates the fair trial procedure.

She is allegedly a magistrate judge appointed by the Judicial Appointment Commission. Her name appears on the list of district judges on the UK Department of Justice's justice.gov website. The problem is that there is no first name on this list in front of the surname Baraitser who was appointed as a judge in 2011.

The judge whom WikiJustice delegates were able to observe 19 times from 21 October 2019 to 9 September 2020 never shows up in the courtroom. She is never introduced by name by a bailiff. Her name is never written on the public documents posted in the courtroom on the doors or the notice board. Her name is not written on a display in the courtroom. So the public does not know who is judging, which is very problematic.

« Vanessa's » first name was given to the public by the press present in Room 1 of Westminster Court on 21 October 2019. Since then the name and surname has been propagated and broadcast thousands of times by the media and by gullible activists.

But there is no evidence that this person is called by that name. This woman looks like a twin to another public figure whom the media portrays as "Vanessa Baraitser's sister". Lisa Baraitser is a professor at the Birbeck College of Psychosocial Studies at the University of London. She specialises in gender, sexuality, motherhood, feminism, queer theories and psychoanalysis. Lisa Baraitser is a clinical psychologist and psychotherapist.

Her 2018 book on motherhood is prefaced by the famous American queer feminist sociologist Judit Butler. The public media such as the BBC promote it. Lisa Baraitser is also the director of the Pur theatre company founded in 1995 by Simon Goodengough Bayly a business partner of her father Michael Baraitser. She became Director of the Pur Theater in 2006.

Maybe Lisa Baraitser is Judge Baraitser? She has the social position to be appointed as a magistrate judge since it is enough to be an honest citizen and to have 26 half days per year to apply to sit in a magistrate courtroom. The Judicial Commission favours women and academics to be appointed as magistrate judges.

Lisa Baraitser also has the ability to organise such a "play" because she has many years of experience in directing her "pyschological theatre ».

Furthermore, witnesses testify that her physical appearance, voice, diction, way of speaking is very similar to the voice and physical appearance of "Vanessa" Baraitser.

However, the hearings concerning the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange, do not respect any of the rules of fair trial and international law. It resembles a theatrical game.

These two links of the Baraitser family, on the one hand in procreation and childhood, on the other hand in theatre, are troubling to say the least. Indeed, the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange denounced networks of paedocriminality, sexual slavery and child trafficking. Such trafficking often takes place in hospitals. Informants told us of thefts of babies from maternity wards to unwilling mothers.



The hearings are staged, do not respect any laws and take place in private entities with no connection to the sovereign judiciary of the United Kingdom.

Furthermore, through the Alexandre Djouri case, Judge Baraitser has secondary links with the Carlyle Group parent company of Booz Allen Hamilton headed by Robert James Woolsey who was the boss of Edward Snowden. The citizen known as Julian Paul Assange helped the citizen known as Edward Snowden flee the USA.

Seen as a whole, these operational and interest links cast serious doubts on the impartiality of judge magistrate Baraitser towards the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange

Lisa Baraitser Berlin

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=2095764027340909

Indeed, witnesses who insisted on remaining anonymous (we protect our sources), told us about the abduction of children in maternities, notably by midwives or with the complicity of midwives. These testimonies are corroborated, below, by the historian Marion Sigaut and by an interview of the Queen Elisabeth during Covid’s confinement.

The historian, Marion Sigaut, from a WHO statement on Coronavirus, and a speech by the Queen to the British people, an overview of the abominable story of children abducted for their own good.

Marion Sigaut

https://youtu.be/sbhwLiTk984Queen

Elisabeth about children

On 30 March 2020, through its Executive Director Michael Ryan, the WHO considered, under the pretext of COVID-19, isolating certain members of family units. A week later the Queen of England envisaged the same thing with regard to children.

https://youtu.be/DEAA7U2OqZw

Australia police arrest the mother and kidnap the child

https://youtu.be/XioN-_Q1dpY

https://web.archive.org/web/20190515205419/http://www.drsallybaker.com/tag/benedict-birnberg/

• During the hearings, the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange does not have the right to stand up, testify or ask questions.He only has the right to give his surname, first name and date of birth.
• 
  
• Afterwards, he remains silent until the end of the hearing and if he tries to express himself, Judge Baraitser orders him to keep quiet. This is a violation of fair trial and habeas corpus.

• It is difficult for journalists from outside the Wikileaks seraglio to get accreditation to enter the courtroom. Joseph Farell, members of the ICJ and Wikileaks ensure the sorting of journalists.

• Every effort is made to discourage anyone who is not tight to the Wikileaks, CIJ, Wau Holland Stiftung, Frontline Charity Trust and Courage Corp seraglio from entering the court and attending the hearings. The trial is not public as stipulated by the fair trial.
  

We recall that trials must be held in public.

The security agencies in Westminster Court, Woolwich Court and Old Bailey, do not seem to be driven by the British government.

Westminster Court, Woolwich Court and Old Bailey are private entities where a legal trial of the nature of that of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange cannot take place.

Stella Morris, aka Stella Gonzalez Devant, aka Stella Morris Robertson, aka, aka?... is present at some of the hearings. She is at the side of the lawyers but she does not plead. According to the documents to which we had access, she is not a lawyer and is not registered with the English Bar. Upon which title is she admitted in the Court among lawyers, rather than in the public area? She claims to be the companion of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange. If she were a lawyer, she would not have the right to plead. This is a procedural flaw that nullifies all the proceedings in progress.

Stella Morris never answered our written solicitations. As for the Assange lawyers, they maintains Mr Julian Paul Assange isolated from independent citizen defenders who try to provide him assistance.

About Stella Morris
Stella Morris, aka Stella or Sara Gonzalez Devant, aka Stella Smith Robertson who claims to be the partner of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange is not a member of the English Bar. She therefore lied about her profession. She cannot be the lawyer for the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange. She does not have the right to be in the courtroom where she is yet regularly present. She has three names, none of which appears to be her birth name. She does not appear to have a legal identity. She worked at the Jeanne Sauvé Foundation where her mentor was Canadian Stephen Saideman.

➤   Stephen Saideman has ties with NATO and especially the Council on Foreign Relations, on whose board David M Rubinstein, Cofounder an Co-executive Chairman of the Carlyle Group, Thad W. Allen Senior Executive Advisor Booz Allen Hamilton and Janet Napolitano, President Barack Obama's first Homeland Security Secretary (2009-2013) sit. It is legitimate to consider collusion between Stella Morris, aka Stella or Sara Gonzalez Devant, aka Stella Smith Robertson, Vanessa Baraitser and the Carlyle Group to harm the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange. From the Obama-Clinton administration to the Booz Allen Hamilton led by Robert James Woolsey, all have a vested interest in the disappearance of prosecution witness Julian Paul Assange.

➤   Moreover, since Stella Morris, aka Stella Gonzalez Devant, aka Stella Smith Robertson lied about her profession, it is likely that she lied about the nature of her relationship with the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange and her motherhood.

➤   Through Booz Allen Hamilton and Robert James Woolsey, there is a link with Lord Jacob Rothchild by Genie Energie (Robert James Woolsey, Dick Cheney, Rupert Murdoch and Jacob Rothchild) and the Crown of England, owner of the private entity the City of London and therefore of the management of the Old Bailey. All these collusions are contrary to the rules of fair trial.

In the light of all these facts, it is clear that the citizen known as Mr Julian Paul Assange is not receiving a fair trial in the United Kingdom and is being tortured.

Status of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange
So, it is legitimate to question the status of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange in this case. He is not the subject of regular proceedings. He is held incommunicado and tortured by private entities that appear to be connected with the Crown of England or part of it, English government or part of it, the German Government or part of it, USA government or part of it, and others governments reviewed along in this complaint.

At this stage of our investigations, three main possibilities arise concerning the defender status.

✦  Is the citizen known as Julian Assange a hostage? In whose hands? Are negotiations under way? Between which entities? Governmental entities? Unlawful entities? Both? Who is in charge of the negotiations? Which states are involved?

✦  Is the citizen known as Julian Assange a war prisoner? If so, what kind of war is it? To which army, police or security agency does the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange belong?

✦  If Julian Assange is a prisoner of war, there's a good chance it's because he penetrated enemy lines, divulged information related to this war and got caught.

✦  Furthermore, one of our IT people said, "We should have taken his computer away from him sooner!" Earlier? Before he denounced Epstein, Dutroux, the criminals of Outreau? Before they denounce the deployment of rogue entities?

Why a war prisoner?

According to public domain information, it is reasonable to believe that the spread of the C19 pathogen and the containment and muzzling of the population is akin to a military-like deployment operation. Many geopolitical facts and diplomatic events involving various states show that we are in a pre-war or war situation.

The French government has sold all its wheat stocks. This decision puts France in great danger. Since this decision is contrary to the interests of the people of France, a legitimate question arises : were there secret alliances between private entities or the governments of foreign powers and the French government? This act of treason is reminiscent of the cruel hours in history when Marshal Pétain and the Vichy government had pledged allegiance to Nazi Germany and served its interests.

Sale of French wheat

https://insolentiae.com/nous-sommes-en-train-de-vendre-tout-notre-ble-et-vous-naurez-plus-de-farine-ledito-de-charles-sannat/

https://www.reussir.fr/grandes-cultures/les-exportations-francaises-de-ble-tendre-parties-pour-un-record-historique?fbclid=IwAR3JXm9M0HSbBWgaBjT5awcAGxMM4cRk410BQGGuP-atFDmSoCSsoCu4G1c

The army service is delivered in Chloroquine

https://youtu.be/v_LihBmPf4U

Patent of the Pasteur Institute

http://www.verite-covid19.fr/docs/2-File1-Conference_The_Whole_TRUTH_about_Covid-19_and_Covid-19_Vaccines_August_2020.pdf

The Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier

In March, during the confinement, television and media propaganda reported the contamination of 1046 sailors embarked on the Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier. For days, from 20 to 31 March, the media propagated the accusation that the sailors were contaminated during a stopover in Brest in March during which their families were allowed to board. They therefore blamed the people of Brest and the families.

However, according to our informants, the disease spread not after the port of call in Brest, but after a visit to Sounda, the NATO base in Crete in February. These sources believe that the French sailors were deliberately contaminated by a pathogen - a weapon of war - to test their resistance and to carry out an in vivo experiment of contamination in confined environment.

The media panic in March served above all to make civilians accept the lock-down, although no soldiers died. The primary lock-down impact in France was the desertion of physicians from metropolitan areas: many people died or lately reached hospitals before receiving any antibiotic cure.

Mr Emmanuel Macron and his government put in great danger the sovereignty of France by signing the Treaty of Aachen, without proper public information, public debate nor consultation of French democratic representatives. Franco-German ministerial councils are already being held, with wide scope social, political and strategical prerogatives.

The covid-19 quarantine rules imposed on French citizens, limiting their right to move freely, are based on highly contestable grounds: the state of epidemical seriousness in France is not evaluated in terms of the internationally recognized medical grounds. It is more than legitimate to wonder if the French epidemical monitoring AND counter-productive sanitary deployment is decided by the French government and President.
In any case, these long lasting measures are illegal because they violate fundamental human rights (right to free movement, right to physical integrity, right to freedom to work, etc.) which are inalienable.

As a consequence, France is partially isolated from nations which settled specific quarantine measures, among which Germany, United Kingdom, Israel…

There exists quite obviously and naturally, geopolitical links between the long run Assange-WikiLeaks polymorphic affair, and the internationally coordinated politico-sanitary covid19 operations. The question is, if the density of these links, the density of individual and organized protagonists highly involved in both world-wide scale events, informs about the nature of these links: whether contingent links, or in alignment with mean term strategy of a number of powerful entities.

More and more public information, including patents and researchers’ analysis, suggest that the pathogen C19 from Operation Covid 19 is a laboratory-produced pathogen :  virus-bacteria coupling, DNA sequence, random non-viral propagation, heteroclite symptoms dissimilar from one infected subject to another. The most serious of these symptoms is a sudden loss of smell, with no other clinical signs, which is neurological in nature. (e.g., loss of smell, taste and feelings of hunger and satiety, memory problems, dizziness, tremors, skin rashes, tightening of intercostal muscles, compression of the diaphragm and heart, mucus in the lungs, inhibition of the swallowing reflex).

The symptoms of agent C19 are also reminiscent of those presented by individuals exposed to sarin gas.

Furthermore, wearing the mask weakens in the long run the immune system and therefore particularly exposes the wearer if the Covid-21 illness mentioned by Canadian politicians (error? lapsus? warning?), attacks the immune system and the intestinal microbial flora.

It is legitimate to wonder whether the wearing of the mask has not been imposed on populations to facilitate the work of a new biochemical agent.

All these elements reveal a context of biochemical warfare in which the "ethnic bombs" that Sydney Gottlieb, one of the fathers of the MKultra, began to make in the laboratory at Fort Detrick and experimented on the Vietnamese during the Vietnam War.

We therefore call on the judicial authorities of sovereign countries to open an investigation to determine the nature and origin of the C19 pathogen in order to anticipate a future attack (C21?) and to protect populations (antidote, rapid medical treatment in hospitals by chemical weapons specialists).

Masks, social distancing and confinement further expose populations by weakening their natural individual defences and collective immunity.
The first step in combating a biochemical agent is to identify the enemy and to take military action to prevent harm.

The biochemical weapon hypothesis is too much serious to be ignored. We therefore call upon the judicial authorities of sovereign countries to open an investigation to identify those responsible and to determine who manufactured and disseminated the pathogenic agent C19.

President Donald Trump has several times alluded to a kind of internal war that he has been waging since the beginning of his mandate. Successive French governments diverge from any national common interest, resulting in destruction of public services, loss of strategic industrial assets, destruction of the economy, destruction of heritage by selling it off to countries such as the United Arab Emirates or Saudi Arabia, impoverishment of the population, torture of the population by MKultra-style health measures in violation of fundamental human rights and the constitution, without any rationale about their efficiency, nor monitoring of the physical and mental harmful effects reported by numerous doctors.

Muzzling by mask is a MKultra torture practiced in Guantanamo. In the photos we have added to this complaint, we also observe that the Guantanamo prisoners are wearing socks. This is the case of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange in many photos. This is one more detail added to solid clues indicating he could have been victim of an extraordinary rendition.

If rendition has taken place, it has been staged in the media for more than eleven years. It is therefore a live crime that we are witnessing. The "Truman Show", said Kristinn Hrafnsson, but in the Truman Show the demiurge is forced to free his creature. Unfortunately, we are not in a Hollywood movie. The citizen known as Julian Paul Assange has been tortured, incarcerated incommunicado, exposed as a curious beast, defamed and soiled by the press.

Now, his “suicide” is announced loudly by others, as if he would cowardly accept his defeat before having fought. The reality is that people speak at his place, while he is forced to keep his mouth shut by the judge. Denial of his human rights and humiliation have no limits.

Whatever his name, nationality, function, even if he was a CIA or military agent, a war prisoner, it would not change the case, the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange is subject to international law. He can only be tried in a State Court by magistrates serving a country under sovereign law.

Human rights do not stop at the gates of barracks, security agencies, police stations, prisons or gym locker rooms. Men are born free and equal in rights and as such can only be judged through the rule of law. Even if Sydney Gottlieb affirms it, no citizen is not and must never become a "disposable subject" even if he or she is an intelligence agent or a member of the military.

Strategic object of this

In this undeclared war, at the stage of our investigation, we have identified a strategic object, the Pact for safe, orderly and regular migration, the cornerstone of the establishment of a global governance that would emerge if sovereign states are destroyed.

We have also identified three phases of this process of conquest :

➤   Operation Assange 4 : the destruction of the legal structures of the rule of law, the implementation of censorship, and the establishment of a universal jurisdiction that will not respect fundamental human rights. This operation is a necessary action to be taken to destroy the sovereignty of States. Private entities conduct mock trials on fictitious charges in private courts (Old Bailey, Westminster Court) on privatised territories (City of London Corporation) that are not subjects of international law and have no legitimacy to dispense justice.

The citizen known as Julian Paul Assange denounced the danger of this universal jurisdiction. It is therefore legitimate to think that his lawyer Balthazar Garzon, who promotes this universal jurisdiction, has no interest in defending his client. Other lawyers involved in the Assange case are working to promote this universal jurisdiction: Helena Kennedy of Kershaw, Philippe Sands, Alan Dershowitz, Balthazar Garzon.

The Garzon Foundation for Universal Justice which is a partner of Civitas

https://fibgar.org/Localization/es/docs/fibgar_plan_actuacion_2018.pdf

Busy accounting report but difficult to know who finances Garzon

https://fibgar.org/Localization/es/docs/fibgar_memoria_anual_2017.pdf

All of these lawyers have in common that they defend human rights and have written about torture, but none of them have applied for the release of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange. None of them, not even Amal Clooney who denounces torture in Ireland, has filed a complaint while torture is proven. None of the lawyers in the Assange case have asserted their client's rights. None of the lawyers in the Assange case denounced an empty file or violations of procedures and laws. None of these lawyers demanded that national and international law be applied by the different states involved in the Assange case. None of these lawyers filed a complaint for violation of the Vienna Convention and the Geneva Conventions by the English state. Why?

This is a clear conflict of interest which proves, once again, that this procedure is a false one. By fictitiously condemning the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange, the private entities piloting the mock trial are about to set up this universal jurisdiction illegally. The lying and storytelling methods used are similar (magnitude, vectors, nature) as in the Covid 19 operation.

The citizen known as Julian Paul Assange about Universal Juridiction

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=526251077913115

About Héléna Kennedy of Kershaw and Philippe Sands

https://fr.timesofisrael.com/un-fils-de-nazi-joue-lavocat-du-diable-en-defendant-son-bourreau-de-pere/

https://www.ucl.ac.uk/european-institute/news/2015/may/defence-right

shttps://ucleuropeblog.com/tag/philippe-sands/

https://youtu.be/fsvhD4PZNk0

https://youtu.be/JcTWv06IebE

https://publiclawforeveryone.com/2015/10/23/phillipe-sandes-on-britain-europe-and-human-rights/

https://www.lag.org.uk/article/202279/bill-of-rights-commission-report--the-choice-before-us

https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/analysis/what-connects-us-can-the-answer-be-human-rights/68818.article

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/nov/16/philippe-sands-alarm-bells-human-rights-east-west-street-baillie-gifford-prize-intervie
whttps://londonlifewithliz.com/2018/10/23/helena-kennedy-qc-on-why-british-justice-is-failing-women-and-what-we-all-should-do-about-it/

https://www.baobabsurvivors.org/content/patrons

https://www.refugeewomen.co.uk/set-her-free-5-years-of-campaigning-against-immigration-detention/

Clooney Foundation

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/uk/celebrities/news/a13069604/amal-clooney-recommended-to-join-the-house-of-lords/

https://cfj.org/people/helena-kennedy-qc/

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-31318181

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/amal-clooney-accuse-ted-heath-authorising-torture-northern-ireland-10239318.html

About death penalty in South Arabia

https://www.doughtystreet.co.uk/sites/default/files/media/document/

Helena%20Kennedy%20Report%20on%20Death%20Penalty%20KSA%20-%2029.7.19%20.pdf?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook

About Palestinian child victims of Israeli torture

https://www.ibanet.org/Article/NewDetail.aspx?ArticleUid=b5f285ad-720d-4a8e-a93e-65f15d09f056

https://wrp.org.uk/features/palestinian-child-victims-of-israeli-torture/

Kennedy, Robertson, Sands and Lord Carlile Arbuthnot husband links

http://www.lawyersatrisk.org/members/

Helena Kennedy and Helen Bamber

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helen_Bamber

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/sep/05/my-hero-helen-bamber-helena-kennedy

Gareth Peirce and Helena Kennedy

https://www.versobooks.com/events/127-gareth-peirce-and-helena-kennedy-the-law-and-human-right

➤  Operation Covid 19 : appropriation of territories by subjugation of the population using torture of the type used in Guantanamo Bay, such as the wearing of masks.

The mask makes one lose the notion of time and space, creates a withdrawal of the individual on himself, induces serious psychopathologies and prohibits any coalition aiming at resistance.

Fear, fuelled by the propagandist media, keeps the limbic brain of primitive emotions in constant activity, even overheating, forbidding citizens to use their cortex and neo-cortex to construct a rational thinking that would allow them to analyse the events they face with common sense. This social engineering operation based on torture is a psychiatric weapon of war.

It has two objectives :

➤   the first is to prohibit the individual from opposing the illegal measures taken by the governments involved in this territorial conquest, and to make the people docile by keeping them in a state of stupor that will enable them to accept any arbitrary measure, liberticidal law, including one that would take away its fundamental rights (right to physical integrity, right to free movement, right to work, right to information, etc.).

➤   The second is to make the individual a particle of the social body by making him lose his status as a human being. Suppression of fundamental inalienable rights (right to free movement, to physical integrity, to work) by unconstitutional and illegal measures. Prohibition of family gathering, of honouring the dead, of visiting elderly parents, children taken away from families.

All these measures are violations of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Universal Declaration of Children's Rights, of which the UN is the guarantor. All fundamental human rights are inalienable. Operation Covid 19 is a crime against humanity. There are suspicions of genocide in retirement homes, and poisoning by the compulsory wearing of the mask on a daily basis since it is established that this mask does not protect against viruses (written on the boxes) and that people inhaling their own miasmas, bacteria and toxins, under oxygenation, slowly poison themselves and weakens their immune system.

2020. Februar. A pneumococcus unrelated to the Wuhan virus has hit the ship repair shop in Marseille.

He tells us that the Marseille ship repair industry employs 4,000 people. However, the website of the Marseille ship repair company, itself a subsidiary of the Genoese group SAN GIORGIO, lists 110 employees. The number of employees is multiplied by 39!

A CGT ship repair delegate talks about subcontractors. He is the only one to deliver this data.

In another dispatch, we discover that these 4,000 employees are staying on ships chartered for the occasion. Moored along the sea wall? Where do they come from? For how long? What do all these people work for? Is there an occupational physician following them?

 If they live on the same ships, eat together, work on the same shipyard, the conditions for the spread of an epidemic are there. So the regional health office (ARS) would have put in place, on 3 February, the vaccination of these 4,000 people. What vaccin?

Many questions arise regarding this contamination. What was the nature of the pathogen? What vaccine was given to these workers? What country did these workers come from? Could they have been human trafficked?

These issues are far from being secondary, as they fall within the scope of the Pact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration.

➤    DIEM 25 : The different states are taken in hand by a single political structure. In Europe, dismemberment of sovereign countries, creation of Euro-regions, world cities, distribution of populations according to their social affiliation and the functions they occupy in the world of work. Consolidation of production tools in some countries, China and India, among others. Thanks to the pact for safe, orderly and regular migration, massive sending of workers to these places of production.

After the Covid 19 operation, many French people will be ruined when they leave. And if a universal income is given to all citizens, this will be the sanction for refusing to leave. The working poor are well aware that their RSA (550, 93€ per month) is now accompanied by community service. Once the working poor have been distributed in the various production centres, deployment of "elites" in world cities will take place. The Chinese upper class will be able to invest in Paris, for example. In these metropolitan areas, there will remain a few neighbourhoods dedicated to domesticity.

Srecko Horvat, DIEM 25, Assange : Horvat's video for an Indian TV station in Munich on 26th March 2020. Assange, us and the coronavirus

Srecko Horvat links Assange's situation to ours. He literally says that we have to go through at least some of what he is going through as if Assange and the citizens of the world were being punished or had to experience the violence of the United States. Horvat takes up the storytelling of an Assange founder of Diem 25, whereas the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange never claimed paternity. Once again, remarks are made in the place of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange without the latter being able to deny them. In this video, the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange is used as a war-like propaganda tool.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGFdEUr6tv4&feature=emb_logo

"On 18 October 2020, members of DiEM25 from all over France met to begin the campaign that will take us through to the 2022 elections. A coalition for change is possible, a coalition capable of saving us from the deadly confrontation between Macron and Le Pen. What form will this coalition take? A social coalition? Political coalition? It will be up to us to decide. What is certain is that if this coalition is not capable of proposing a programme that offers concrete victories for the working and middle classes throughout Europe, then we will live a Syriza II - a left-wing government, of course, but one that is so gripped that it will not succeed in carrying our ideas."

DIEM25 begins its deployment in France and presents itself as an alternative between Macron and Le Pen

Yannis Varoufakis, the Varoufakis family and the destruction of Greece in 2015

Giorgos Varoufakis, Yannis's father, is said to be born in Cairo in 1925 and therefore belongs to the Greek Egyptian community, a very ancient community in Egypt from which a good part of the current Greek burghers such as the Benakis originated. We do not know when Yannis Varoufakis's father arrived in Falliro, a chic suburb of Athens, nor what he did during the Second World War and after the war. But it is very important and very structuring even today for Greek society to know what the parents and grandparents of a politician did during the war and after the war.

The dictatorship lasted without interruption in Greece from 1936 (Metaxas came to power) until 1976 (Metapolitevsi, the construction of a modern society, catching up with the huge gap with European countries and building democracy).

From 1936 to 1976, Greece was a harsh royal dictatorship, whose royal and economic elites, the army and above all the political police held an iron fist to a rebellious society with a very strong communist party, born authentically in the social struggles of the 20s and 30s and in the Resistance. More than half of the population was on file with the police, who employed a multitude of collaborators.

The German Nazis employed Greek Nazi collaborators to fight the powerful communist EAM-ELAS Resistance and then the Civil War from 1944 to 1949. Within the framework of the Yalta agreements, Stalin left Greece to the West, the British army entered Athens in December 1944 but instead of liberating the population, it massacred the Greek Communist Resistance (the events of the "dekemvriana" - on 6 December 1944, the British and the Greek Nazis fired on the demonstration in Syndagma Square, the Constitution, killing a number of civilians who were demonstrating their joy at the Liberation).

The Greek Nazis remained in place and the British put back in power the discredited Greek king whose German wife had been a notorious Nazi protagonist. The Civil War is the war of the armed Greek Nazis, led by the British and the Americans, against the army of the Communist Party KKE, who occupy mainly the mountains and villages, whereas they had been forced to withdraw from the big cities.

The American army experimented in Greece with the policy it would implement in Vietnam: they deported the populations of the villages, razed the villages, regrouped the people in the concentration camps, then chased them into the cities into the shantytowns, forbidding them to return to the villages and work the land. The communist partisans are deprived of a rear base, driven further and further into the mountains of the North.

The Americans burn the land with napalm. In 1949 what remained of the partisans, men, women and children, crossed the Yugoslav border. They were not welcomed by Tito, who preferred to see them emigrate to the USSR and Poland, where large communities were formed.

Greece has never recovered from this massacre and that is why Greek agriculture has been destroyed and why the cities are poorly built: in the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s, several million people who had been living in slums for decades had to be housed. Communists or supposed communists were forbidden to work, forbidden to study, chased and imprisoned until 1976 on the prison islands, including the famous Makronissos.

They were tortured with thirst, but also MKultra torture was already being experimented on the detainees, which is shown in the rare films made during this period, but especially in the work of poets, including the famous Yannis Ritsos.

http://cheznousencrete.com/histoire/mako.html

http://commedeslionsdepierre.net/thefilm/contact/?lang=fr

The Greek police force has never been fully denazified since the positions were handed down from father to son in the same families until today. In 1966 the American army reclaimed the British bases in the Mediterranean (Crete, Cyprus) and set up the dictatorship of the Junta of Colonels (April 21, 1967). This was the apogee of torture. Thousands of young people and intellectuals went into exile and fought supported by leftist movements in Western countries. The junta is violent and conservative: prohibition of modern music, mini-skirts, literature, poetry.

The revolt of the young people of Polytechnic (November 17, 1973), a very important date for the Greek society, is repressed by a massacre, but the junta has to leave in 1976. The Americans changed their strategy and preferred to have more civilized bourgeois in power to prevent the communists from taking it in Greece, which was possible. France played an important role, because the PCF had very good relations at the time with the KKE and François Mitterrand was a friend of Andreas Papandreou the leader of the Greek socialists of PASOK and prime minister after 1980.

This is important to explain that for Greek society it is impossible to entrust your country to a man whose family's behavior during the war is unknown. The media say that Giorgos Varoufakis, Yannis' father would have been an engineer in the largest aluminum plant Hallivourgia and would have been communist and deported to Makronissos. This storytelling can only be a lie, because it was forbidden at that time for a young communist (assuming that a son of a bourgeois would become a communist, which at that time was very rare) to study. The deportees to Makronissos, even if they were freed, never reached high positions in society. If the uncle of Giorgos Varoufakis was called Sklavenitis, a large Greek bourgeois family who, together with the Mulliez family, own the Carrefour chain supermarket in Greece, it is impossible that this family was a member of the Greek Communist Party.

The Varoufakis family would have been, according to media storytelling, very close to the Papandreou family. There is no proof of this and the story is not credible. The Varoufakis father cannot have been both a director of the Hallivourgia factory, owned by Lafarge, a large French group, and a man of the radical left. The history of the media seems rather invented to give a respectable origin to a man, Yannis Varoufakis, to whom the European Commission will entrust power in Greece in 2015 in the midst of a popular uprising against the policies of the EU, the ECB and the IMF.

Yannis Varoufakis is now trying with Diem25, using the image of Julian Assange, to gain power everywhere in Europe, and it is not possible for Europeans to accept as their leader a man whose family would have compromised with Nazism.

We do not know either exactly when Yannis Varoufakis was born. Some media speak of Athens or "exoria", "exile", in 1961. But "exoria" in Greek means political exile of the communists, while Father Giorgos Varoufakis left in 1957 to study in England, not in political exile at all. Father Varoufakis' CV is not at all a left-wing activist's history. Moreover, Yannis Varoufakis' mother is supposed to come from a right-wing conservative family and to have married a left-wing activist - this was not possible in Greece until 1975. Women were subordinate to the father who chose their husbands through the proxenio, the marriage bond. They needed the father's permission to marry. They got married in their social class. A Greek bourgeois family in these troubled times would never have allowed their daughter to marry a communist. The story of a "left and right" marriage in the Varoufakis family is unbelievable.

These political divisions are still very important in Greek society today. Even today people still ask "what did your parents do before 1976"? And even today people still vote as a family, often without the secrecy of the vote

https://www.iefimerida.gr/news/189400/aytos-einai-o-pateras-toy-varoyfaki-89-eton-proedros-tis-halyvoyrgikis-kathigitis

http://www.topontiki.gr/article/94743/o-pateras-toy-varoyfaki-einai-o-proedros-tis-halyvoyrgikis-photo

https://www.huffingtonpost.gr/2015/05/02/koinonia-pateras-yianis-varoufakis_n_7195900.html

https://www.iefimerida.gr/news/219524/apisteytes-diloseis-varoyfaki-i-mitera-moy-itan-melos-akrodexias-tromokratikis-organosis

https://www.skai.gr/news/politics/varoufakis-sto-stern-i-mitera-mou-itan-melos-akrodeksias-tromokratik

Nothing is said about the Greek high school or university that Yannis Varoufakis attended. However, whether he was born in 1957 or 1961, the period after 1976 is very important for the formation of the current Greek society and it is essential to have this information to politically situate a militant and a fortiori a man who will hold power in the country and in Europe. Someone who reaches the age of 20 in the 1980s belongs to the generation of the "Metapolitevsi", the best period of Greek democratisation, state building - 1976 to 1988, prosperity and cultural creation.

What is most disturbing is that Yannis Varoufakis left Greece very early, as early as 1983, to pursue studies at the University of Essex (a new university created in 1963) and in Birmingham mathematics and economy, the classic subjects of a neo-liberal "young leader" of the 1980s.

The media credited him with a PhD and a teaching position at the University of Essex in 1985. Varoufakis was 24 years old in 1985 (if born in 1961). How could he have had time to complete 5 years of higher education in Greece, England and a PhD in at least 3 years? The media credits him with a teaching post in Norwich, East England and Cambridge in 1987.

In 1987 he moved to Sydney, where he did not teach economics from which he would have graduated, but ancient philosophy! If it is credible that the son of a bourgeois family continues his studies in Great Britain in the 80s (many middle-class young people did so in the 80s and 90s), it is not credible that a brilliant doctor working in the prestigious University of Cambridge leaves this position for Australia, which in the 80s was for an ambitious European a faraway provincial exile.

Yannis Varoufakis spent a major part of his adult life in Australia and not in Europe. Even if the media credit him with a post in Liege or Glasgow from 2012 there is no evidence of this work and no Greek with a place in Greek society or in the diaspora heard of Yannis Varoufakis before 2015. In particular the political activists of the Left did not hear of him before February 2015. The founding activists of Syriza did not know him before

Alexis Tsipras made him his Minister of Economy. Neither did the journalists, economists and activists who founded the Citizen Debt Audit Committee in May 2010 together with the Greek economist Kostas Lapavitsas.

It is dangerous to entrust your country's destiny to someone you know nothing about, who has arrived from abroad after more than 20 years of absence and whose biography is not certain.

https://fisy.gr/to-elliniko-xreos-kai-i-epitropi-logistikou-elegchou-tou-xreous

Yannis Varoufakis is said to have set up the Valve Corporation subsidiary, a Microsoft video game subsidiary.

https://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valve_Corporation

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valve_(company)

He is said to have been director in Greece of the Steam platform.

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steam for the distribution of video game

Is he actually a professor of economics? Nor is managing Microsoft subsidiaries a common occupation for a professor of political philosophy. Working for an over-powerful American group when we know the disastrous role of the United States in the recent history of Greece (the dictatorship of the colonels) can be seen as a betrayal. Yannis Varoufakis is not credible as a potential leader of the European Union because of his links with Bill Gates, the main leader of the covid dictatorship in Europe today.

Tsipras and Yannis Varoufakis let their country be submitted to the diktat of the ECB, the European Commission and the IMF in July 2015, then he has to leave Greece for Germany and in May 2016 he creates the Diem25 movement with European scale ambition. He uses Julian Assange as a guarantor of his movement by sending Srecko Horvat, Croatian leader of Diem 25, to present the movement with Assange at 3 Hans Crescent Street on 23 June 2016. From May 2016 to April 2019 Yannis Varoufakis and his wife Danae Stratou would come several times to see Julian Assange at 3 Hans Crescent Street.

Danae Stratou, an artist, comes from a large family of owners of the Greek textile industry living in England and Australia. She is the daughter of Fedron Stratos, owner of the cotton textile empire Patras Piraeus and of the sculptor Eleni Potaga. She studied in London and spent her life in the Commonwealth. But she would be the second wife of Yannis Varoufakis. The first wife would be Margarite Poulos, professor in Sydney. Yannis Varoufakis’ daughter, Xenia, has been living in Australia since 2005. Varoufakis' family has never left Australia.

Yannis Varoufakis therefore has no particular ties with the European Union and should therefore not be considered as a credible potential European leader.

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danae_Stratou

http://gesd.free.fr/varoulecho.pd

The question is WHO put in power this man who has done the misfortune of Greece and whose real life is unknown to the public? Who is trying to put him in power in the European Union today by using the caution of Julian Assange?

What is certain is that entities proceeded in the same way as the Nazis to gain access to power. First the state bodies and institutions, then the media, which became propagandists, and finally justice. They then designated an evil, the "Jew" harmful to the development of society as were homosexuals, communists, elderly, handicapped, gypsies, opponent artists, useless mouths? They then opened camps to get them working like slaves before ending up in ovens. Today, evil is called "human".

 “It” is dangerous and eventually contaminating. It must be isolated, placed in camps, children taken away by force from their parents, as Australian officers are now allowed to do. The investor in genetics Laurent Alexandre calls for old people with “residual life expectancy” to be vaccinated. From residual life to "residues", there is one step. Who decides on who is a “residue“? In history, they were eugenists and Nazis, mainly

Soldiers’s codes

https://www.uvu.edu/rotc/resources/soldiers-creed.html

https://www.army.mod.uk/who-we-are/our-people/a-soldiers-values-and-standards/

https://www.ausa.org/code-conduct

https://www.goarmy.com/soldier-life/being-a-soldier/living-the-army-values.html

http://www.usafp.org/previous/op_med/milmedprof/mediccode.html

Code du Soldat 1999

The "covid" hybrid war against Western peoples

The war currently being waged in the name of the "covid crisis" is a war against peoples. This war is a sneaky aggression waged in the name of health, but in reality it aims at enslaving peoples and robbing them of their property. China massively holds US treasury bonds, making it a leading creditor of the United States. If China massively sells US treasury bonds, the US will be destabilised by massive inflation. But if China does this, the speculative real estate bubble on its territory will burst and China will not be a winner.

On the other hand, in the case of a "Great Reset", the zeroing of all debts in exchange for durable goods, the American debt will be cancelled or reduced and in exchange China will be able to obtain for almost nothing the durable real estate assets of the American and European peoples (plots of value in historic city centres, hospitals and universities emptied of their students, historic buildings, restaurants, airports etc.).

The covid war is aimed against the Western peoples. Corrupt governments prevent people from living and working and imprison them at home under police threats in the name of pseudo health regulations. Companies and individuals have been surviving in the West since March 2020 under the infusion of a gigantic debt that will be reset to zero in January 2021 by the World Economic Forum in Davos under the chairmanship of Karl Schwab and Charles "Windsor".

Western peoples and states will be ruined by the Great Reset and will lose their property after losing their freedom

Object of the strategic attack. Objective of the attack reached around 2030.

A very important pact was signed in 2018 under the aegis of United Nations : the “Pact for safe, orderly and regular migration“. Safe, orderly and regular migration is not so far from describing mass deportations.

All countries will be countries of arrival and departure. It refers to a legal wage without it being defined and guaranteed by law (Objective 7-i). This pact is not legally binding. This means that it does not comply with any of the international laws in force, particularly those relating to fundamental human rights. The Pact refers to human rights standards, not laws. However, in States based on the rule of law, only laws have legitimacy and make an action legal.

The verb “to reflect” is unclear and does not correspond to a secured legal framework. A citizen, a company, a local authority enforces laws that are part of a code of laws that have undergone legislative review. Standards and laws do not apply to the same domains. Standards apply to the industrial field, laws apply to the legal field. Looking at migration management in terms of standards means considering them as industrial and commercial flows. This is unconceivable with regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and all related texts. A human being is not subject to the rules or laws of trade but to those of Human Rights.

"Even though the Compact itself is not legally binding, it does reflect existing human rights norms and other relevant legal principles to which states may already be bound pursuant to their treaty obligations (and, in some cases, customary international law)."

This plan a priori only regulates migration for work, but it does regulate the migration of unaccompanied children and their care by the social services of the diasporas concerned. These children travel alone or are separated from their parents (Objective 7-b). Why do they travel alone? Why are they separated from their parents? In the common ambitions are defined adaptations to the needs of the child (Ambition-h) without these needs being defined. However, the needs of the child are defined in the Declaration of the Rights of the Child and one of the first needs defined in this declaration is the right of the child to live within his or her family and not to migrate alone to countries where his or her status is not clearly defined, except by some vague norms.

Not countries! “Diasporas”. But above all, a governance of migration! Why migration governance? Are migrants different citizens with different rights? If a governance of migration is formed, it is because sovereign states have disappeared and this governance is of a private nature. It can therefore have a mercantile function.

This article suggests that this plan validates an industrialisation of trade in human beings. Moreover, the fact that academics are involved in this governance suggests that scientific experiments can be carried out on what are, in this plan, herds of human beings. Social services can be private entities that might run out of control and handle children or citizens in a criminal way. What control? Who controls? Can we trust the controls provided by countries which deny or let deny the basic human rights of people like Julian Assange, year after year, making sure the whole world knows it?

These children travelling alone will be given an identity, like any migrant for that matter. Why should children not have an identity as part of a plan for safe, orderly, regular migration? Where were they born? What happened to their parents? Why don't they have parents? Who may have taken them away from their parents? Why did they take them away from their parents?

When they have finished their mission in a country, they are sent back to their countries of origin. Or another country perhaps? Objective 21 (a and c) What will these children have been used for? Who will take care of them in their home country if they have no parents?

This plan is the open door to all illicit uses of young children including prostitution. It violates the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Declaration of the Rights of the Child.

Disappearance of children in USA and Camps to hold children

https://humansarefree.com/2019/11/460000-missing-children-in-the-usa-each-year-while-the-entire-dinosaur-media-protects-pedophiles.html?fbclid=IwAR3udY0y2-LqfQ2nHzqCodmHH8smvAO0uhrgBFSM7O9NsU-HThEXUDlz9jo

https://humansarefree.com/2020/09/cdc-opens-up-fema-camps-to-hold-children.html?fbclid=IwAR3vv0LAoEkW4LVNO0879gxifUFe7T5eJG8TigaGlCQfefU70lkNP79xv1s

https://swprs.org/geopolitics-and-pedocriminality/

The plan calls for the carrier to declare his cargo at the border. Citizens, regardless of nationality, are in possession of passports when travelling. If a carrier is in charge of declaring them, it is because they are without papers and without identity, or an identity without legal origin. The plan therefore does not define them as citizens with rights, but as a declared flow of goods.

In general, people emigrate because they have no choice. The Pact includes emergency preparedness, which implies that "disasters" can be planned for with full knowledge of the facts. We have a sad example of this with the Covid 19 plan, which is deliberately destroying the French and different countries economy and risks to force its population to migrate in order to survive. But who would manage this mass migration? Where will it be sent? By which labour code will it be protected?

The requirements contained in the pact must be in place before 2030. The UN is responsible for ensuring that the signatory states meet the deadlines.

The plan provides for administrative detention camps that look very much like concentration camps. It is about individuals without identity, deprived of their papers, their means of payment, dispossessed of their bank accounts.

We are indeed in a pact that is supposed to regulate labour migration. However, what is described there is very similar to planning for the enslavement of populations with mass deportation to the places of production. Which could be straight-forward once countries like France or Greece are ruined.

To all intents and purposes, we recall that imprisoning a citizen who has not committed any crime or offence is a violation of his or her fundamental rights. It is therefore a crime that this plan validates, even if it provides for such detention to be used only as a last resort. As far as human rights are concerned, no exception is legally tolerable.

Fundamental human rights are inalienable.

The signatory countries of this Pact and the UN, which is in charge of enforcing it, violate fundamental human rights. We recall that the UN's mission is to ensure respect for human rights, not to violate them.

We therefore request the legal authorities of sovereign countries to kindly open an investigation to determine who validated the Pact on safe, orderly and regular migration and who, at the United Nations, has undertaken to enforce it in violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and all texts relating to the protection of Human Rights.

We ask the authorities of sovereign countries and the UN to repeal this illegal pact as soon as possible.

After investigation, it appears that the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange seems be the archetype of this enslaved migrant, deported child without identity, going from boss to boss and receiving a "legal" salary, not legally defined, close to nothing. The activity report of the Wau Holland foundation stipulates that Julian Assange will be paid if the foundation receives enough donations to do so. This is tantamount to asking him to work pro bono.

Things are moving fast. We cannot exclude that powerful opportunists manipulate the geopolitical context. Thus the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange could very well be a soldier ready to fall at the front of a nameless war. He seems to have unveiled part of the plan, human trafficking, of which he himself seems to be the victim. This brings us to the third hypothesis concerning the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange.

We call on the judicial bodies of sovereign countries to open an investigation to determine who is responsible for writing and signing the pact for safe, orderly and regular migration that violates the fundamental human rights of which the UN is the guarantor.

Such a pact should never have seen the light of day at the UN. No UN member country should have signed it. The UN has no legitimacy to enforce it.

We call for its immediate repeal.

The Nazis developed the industrialisation of crime

Whoever does not know history is condemned to relive it, said Karl Marx. From 1933 to 1945, the Nazis euthanised more than 200,000 people, including at least 5,000 children. Medical personnel made the families believe that their children had died from illness.

"The Third Reich had 30 special departments for children, as they were called, in which the Nazis orchestrated the euthanasia of minors. Men and women in white coats administered overdosed drugs such as Luminal or morphine, and children died".

Slate http://www.slate.fr/monde/79310/nazis-euthanasie-milliers-enfants-malades

https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/euthanasia-program

Aktion T4

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aktion_T4

http://www.slate.fr/monde/79310/nazis-euthanasie-milliers-enfants-malades

Today, Germany considers that the welfare of a child can only be guaranteed when he or she grows and develops in Germany. Parents who were not separated have been deprived of their children when they planned to leave German soil. Numerous proceedings are ongoing. (http://www.enfants-otages.eu)

Forced political adoption of children from the GDR

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0tLimJ-pdE&fbclid=IwAR1ukK-haP74bC7IvY2ubIKbCBy2_egAp2qONQe0Q3TxvxzSSeFEfRLBbk8

Covid 19 Emergency Response Act 2020
 

25A—Removal of children

Without derogating from section 25, an authorised officer may, for the purpose of ensuring compliance with any direction under that section, remove a child from any premises, place, vehicle or vessel to a place of residence of the child or to a hospital or quarantine facility, as the authorised officer thinks fit (and may, in doing so, use such force as is reasonably necessary).

https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/LZ/C/A/COVID-19%20EMERGENCY%20RESPONSE%20ACT%202020/CURRENT/2020.7.AUTH.PDF

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-BscU4EXgs

https://humansarefree.com/2020/09/australian-police-can-kidnap-people-for-medical-reasons-and-remove-anything-including-underwear-to-forcefully-administer-vaccines.html?fbclid=IwAR2v0swMOjIxfcC6pNOgszfzr4T2WjbXVAX0i4hJbNP2qjLsIw_5-cDfsKA

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/may/26/white-australian-stole-indigenous-children-and-then-stole-their-victimhood-too

https://australianstogether.org.au/discover/australian-history/stolen-generation

When we start sorting humans, there is no limit to crime. In French parliamentary commission, there were testimonies of what can be called active euthanasia in old people's homes. In how many countries is this the case? In Poland, children are taken away from their families for C19. Who took the children away from their families?

German Nazis to place them in Lebensborn. The family cult in which the citizen known as Julian Assange was raised operated on the principles of Lebensborn.

Few people appearing through WikiLeaks-Assange case have ties or possible ties with Nazis or Nazism.

Carl Lundsum of the Pirate Bay. Kim Doctom, though he denies it. Gore Vidal, who met Mussolini during the war in the Embassy of USA, who had like Hitler an admiration for the religion of Mysteries and the Emperor Julian. Gore Vidal is a prolific writer (and much more) of the book shown by Julian Assange out from 3 Hans Crescent Street. In his own words, Gore Vidal was a friend of Princess Margaret. The crown of England also had ties with the Nazis.

Lebensborn

https://lebensbornheim-sonnenwiese.jimdofree.com/english-translation/history-of-lebensborn/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebensborn

https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-quot-lebensborn-quot-program

https://youtu.be/qFTK9-FMoGA

Kim Doctom

https://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2014/03/more_on_dotcom.html

Karl Lundsum

https://thetrichordist.com/2017/09/26/why-is-it-every-time-we-turn-over-a-pirate-rock-white-nationalists-nazis-and-bigots-scurry-out/

http://spitfirelist.com/news/ukraine-update-pierre-omidyar-glenn-greenwalds-financial-angel-helped-finance-coup-swedish-neo-nazi-milieu-of-carl-lundstrom-assisting-ounb-heirs/

https://www.theregister.com/2012/09/21/pirate_bay_fascist_bankrupt/

https://www.quora.com/What-was-Carl-Lundströms-role-in-The-Pirate-Bay

Crown of England and nazis

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-33578174

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jul/20/queens-nazi-salute-a-sign-of-ignorance-shared-by-many-in-scary-times

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jul/19/queens-nazi-salute-video-pressure-mounts-on-royals-to-open-up-archives

https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2017/12/the-crown-edward-hitler-nazi

https://peoplesworld.org/article/how-winston-churchill-protected-hitlers-nazi-king-of-england/

https://medium.com/lessons-from-history/uncovering-british-royal-family-correspondence-with-nazi-germany-marburg-files-c12feffc41c1

Many of the citizens involved in the Assange case have links to the Nazis.

We urge the judicial institutions of sovereign states to open an investigation to determine whether Nazi sects may have links to the private entities driving the Assange trial. The Black Sun sect, for example, which is close to the cult of Mithra described by Gore Vidal in his books.

In this war that does not say its name, a key element is the use of new technologies not only for surveillance, but to create an “enhanced man“ through the use of A.I. and electronics. Dr Laurent Alexandre mentions the Google project Calico to “euthanize death“, nice word for immortality. To experiment human enhancement, test human samples will be required. This is one more possible convergence with the order of military deployment in the willpower to separate children from their families.

Dr Laurent Alexandre about augmenting human and immortality

https://qactus.fr/2020/10/10/q-scoop-urgent-ecouter-cela-les-psychopathes-en-marche/

The acceleration of workforce replacement by machines (whatever mechanical or hybrid), which have a huge environmental cost, might accelerate birth control requirements, or even massive depopulation. Very much worried about CO2 topic, Bill Gates sees in vaccination a way to control population growth.

On his side, the former technical director of Pfizer Michael Yeadon launched a petition for a “stay of action” on Sars-cov-2 vaccination, pointing out risks including the possible infertility effect on women, in relation with the Syncytin-1 protein.

Bill Gates CO2 and population control

https://youtu.be/ePgK3NOyc6I

It is important to remember that Bill and Melinda Gates are the subject of numerous criminal proceedings after disastrous vaccine campaigns.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. calls for an investigation against Bill Gates
https://kenfm.de/bill-gates-robert-f-kennedy-jr-calls-for-an-investigation/?fbclid=IwAR3gOLXv5JlaMt_BMGse8_KvG7M8twEE6a8ktdsWFvnkI7xfpUPFxaHcCWs

Michael Yeadon and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg: Sars-cov-2 Pfizer/BioNTech vaccin regulatory Stay of action 43 pages petition :

https://orwell1984366490226.wordpress.com/2020/12/04/former-top-pfizer-scientist-michael-yeadon-claims-covid-vaccines-may-cause-infertility-in-women/

Mass Sterilization”: Kenyan Doctors Find Anti-fertility Agent in UN Tetanus Vaccine

https://www.globalresearch.ca/mass-sterilization-kenyan-doctors-find-anti-fertility-agent-un-tetanus-vaccine-2/567829

It is worth recalling that the Bertha Foundation is based in Kenya, that Mr. John Shipton and Mrs. Jennifer Robinson have links with Kenya.

Today, Kenya's borders are closed, schools, also closed, are no longer taking in children, and the Polish army, which has no bilateral agreement with Kenya, has deployed in the country. Camps are reported to have been opened there.

We therefore call on the legal authorities of sovereign countries to open an investigation to determine what is happening in Kenya. The fact that children are deprived of school is a violation of the Universal Declaration of the Rights of the Child, and therefore of inalienable fundamental rights. Who authorised the Polish army to deploy in a country that does not have a bilateral agreement with Poland?

Bertha Fundation in Kenya

https://berthafoundation.org/shorthand_story/indigenous-land-rights-in-kenya/

The Bertha Foundation deals with migration

https://berthafoundation.org/activists/https://undocublack.org

The Bertha Fundation

https://docubase.mit.edu/funders-and-incubators/bertha-foundation/

The program of this nameless war is circulating on the internet.

"See what they plan to do with us everywhere. If people allow it, goodbye to Freedom.

the truth is slowly coming out

In Canada, a person with access to confidential information from the ruling Liberal Party has disclosed the details of the plunder. Link to the article: Here are the main assumptions, guidelines and objectives that have been defined by the committee and bureau leaders (PMOs): The 1st phase of the additional lockdown will be carried out continuously, starting with major cities, metropolitan areas and outside.

Expected date: November 2020. Commence take-over and construction of isolation facilitys/camps - in every province of Canada, especially in states and less populated areas. Deadline: December 2020. 3 Daily number of new COVID-19 cases must exceed the testing possibilities - a continuous increase in the number of COVID-related deaths is also indicated. Deadline - end of 2020. 4) Complete and consecutive blockade of the country (more severe than first and second wave restrictions).

Expected date of implementation: end of December 2020 - beginning of January 2021. 5. Reform and extension of the programme for the unemployed (target for all citizens) - to move to the General Primary Income Programme (PPDP). Estimated deadline: first quarter of 2021. 5a. Plan for the transition of most people to the General Primary Income Programme. (PPDP) Most people - unemployed on PPDP. Estimated deadline - mid-2nd quarter 2021 6.

Predicted COVID-19 mutation (referred to as COVID-21); secondary virus infection leading to third wave, with much higher mortality and much higher rates of infection. Expected date - February 2021. The daily increase in new cases of hospitalisation due to C-19/C-21 and deaths related to these viruses will exceed the capacity of medical facilities. Expected I/II quarter 2021. 8. application of new extended restrictions/blocks (referred to as third blockade). Full travel restrictions will be imposed (including between provinces and cities).

Expected date - 2nd quarter 2021. 9 Planning of various failures in the supply chain of goods to the food market, e.g. stock shortages, high economic instability. Estimated end of the second quarter of 2021. Deployment of military services, in major metropolitan areas and on all major roads - to establish travel control points. This will reduce travel and traffic. Organisation of the necessary logistical support throughout the country. Deadline - 3rd quarter 2021. These are the main 10 assumptions and objectives of the plan. The members of the Strategic Planning Committee were also asked to design an effective way of changing the mentality of Canadians to meet these challenges and unprecedented economic ventures. Proposal/Design - one that will change the face of Canada and change the lives of Canadians forever. Other Fundamental - Generally, the main assumptions are: Eliminate the current economic collapse of the country - by eliminating the debt of the citizens - as well as the state (in various ways) and, at the same time, eliminate private property. We have therefore been informed that in order to balance the country's economy and what was actually the result of the collapse of the house

Indeed, as a result of the international economic collapse, the Federal Government of Canada intends to offer all its citizens - Canadians - full cancellation of all debts. (This is to work as follows: The Federal Government will propose to eliminate all personal debts (mortgages, loans, credit cards, etc.) that will be transferred to Canada - by the IMF - as part of a programme known as the World Debt Reset - or 'resetting' - the cancellation of global debts (all) - with the signature of the President and Board of Directors of the IMF. For all Canadians, for example, a debt cancellation programme is planned in the near future. The main basic condition is to agree to a vaccine against Covid-19. Everyone will have to take this vaccine - every year. It will be free. Those who refuse to cooperate (in terms of debt relief and vaccines) will be considered a 'threat to public safety' and will be immediately transferred to isolation facilities. (In Canada, the construction of such so-called isolation - or 'concentration' - camps has begun).

Those who will be in these facilities will receive two alternative 'non-refusal proposals' on the day of admission: - agree to a vaccine, participate in a debt relief programme and are either released or - will remain in the isolation camp for an indefinite period of time; classified as a serious threat to public health. In the meantime, the government will confiscate all their assets. Everything is legal - for the public good. These plans are not just for Canada, in fact, most of them."

If it is authentic, this plan violates all laws of international law and fundamental human rights. We urge the judicial authorities to open an investigation to determine whether private entities fomented such plan by acting as an organised gang.

We call on the authorities of all sovereign countries to do their utmost to protect civilian populations from this plan which, if it was realized, would be similar in nature to the crimes perpetrated by the Nazis. Moreover, it would put in danger the whole humanity: vaccinating a big part of national or world population with experimental products (RNA genetically modified vaccin), never validated in small/medium scale with years of observation, is simply a risk of human species extinction.

A Canadian official document is fully compatible with this alleged plan, a Request for information (RFI) to “Service Provider(s) for Federal Quarantine / Isolation sites”, “that will be used to house and care for people for public health and other related federal requirements associated with the COVID-19 pandemic response.” These “other federal requirements” would open room to any arbitrary abduction of any citizen. This is an RFI, not a law, but this is extremely worrying, and it seems barbed wire surrounded sites already exist (in Portage, La Prairie).

About camps in Canada

https://youtu.be/sm0vjR4P72o

https://web.archive.org/web/20201005134739/https://buyandsell.gc.ca/procurement-data/tender-notice/PW-ZL-105-38463

https://youtu.be/HTnCUDxIbR

Yhttps://odysee.com/@laileastick:4/2020-145-Camps-au-canada:b

The trial of Julian Assange is of a sacrificial nature.

When did Julian Assange decide to take action to unveil disturbing facts for hidden powers or criminals? Did he act alone?

The one thing we can be pretty sure of with the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange is his courage. One informant who seems to have tested his qualities told us: "he is of exceptional intelligence and physical strength".

If the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange has been in the MKultra regime since childhood, raped for money by paedocriminals or used to trap influential citizens, subjected to the will of a master and placed in rendition for eleven years, he must indeed have great qualities because the man sitting in the box with whom we have communicated with all means possible (visually at hearings, letters…) has always shown strength of character and combativeness.

If he has all the characteristics of a tortured, beaten, drugged man, he does not show suicidal tendencies. All our delegates and doctors can testify to this, including our recent observations in Old Bailey room number 1.

Report of our delegate

http://monika-karbowska-liberte-pour-julian-assange.ovh/index.php/2020/09/23/julian-assange-julian-assange-in-front-of-the-family-at-the-old-bailey-on-september-9-2020/

We have demonstrated that the trial of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange is a mock trial that takes place in private legal entities. The Court of the Old Bailey is located in the City of London Corporation, a private territory belonging to the Crown of England and governed by feudal law.

The City of London Corporation is a lawless territory, a legal and tax haven. It is therefore not a subject of international law. No trials under international law can therefore take place there. We have also shown that the charges are far-fetched. They violate fundamental human rights and all the texts relating to human rights.

The lawyers are all in conflict of interest with the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange. If an extradition is pronounced, it will be done illegally by misuse of the Navigation Act which regulates international trade. This legal sleight of hand is only possible because the State of Virginia, where the Assange case’s grand jury would have been held, also falls under the Navigation Act.

About of State of Virginia

State of Virginia operates as a private entity. State of Virginia is not a subject of International Law. State of Virginia has no international sovereignty. It can therefore neither prosecute the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange, nor organise his trial, no international lawsuit.

Furthermore, a grand jury can only rule on a crime committed in the state in which it was committed. That crime must be committed by an American citizen under American territory.

The citizen known as Julian Paul Assange is not an American citizen. Therefore, he cannot be the subject of a proceeding on American territory. Concerning the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange, the prescriptions of a grand jury have no legal value.

Moreover, the procedure is carried out in the name of Julian Paul Assange which is a pseudonym. All legal proceedings must be carried out under the birth name of the person being prosecuted. This procedure therefore has no legality.

The persecution of the citizen Julian Paul Assange is above all a punishment. In antique patriarchal families, any betrayal is punished by the sacrifice of the one who betrayed in the name of the family's survival.

Julian Paul Assange expresses it very clearly in a video. As Ms. Baraitser forbids him to speak during the hearings, we urge you to listen to the following short video in which he clearly expresses that his trial is a punishment, not a legal procedure in accordance with international law

Julian Paul Assange about punishment

https://www.facebook.com/101212656596379/videos/391406244918446

In a wider scope, French influencer Jacques Attali advocates in his book Who will govern the world tomorrow, another kind of sacrifice. In order to define humanity, Jacques Attali uses the notion of "human species", to which he attributes "the rights and duties of the species", and goes on to write: “Humanity has the right to strive for survival, even if this means defending itself against other forms of life. The rights and duties of the species are not to be confused with those of every human being.”

He therefore begins with a huge paradigm shift, leaving aside the fundamental rights guaranteed to men, and therefore to every human being, by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, while making a distinction between the "rights and duties" of "the species" and those of "every human being". On the one hand, the species is not a classical legal notion, Jacques Attali thus brings civilization in the direction of a kind of state of nature. He omits to recall that men are free and equal in law. He grants the right to "humanity", thus, according to his definition, to human species, so as to "defend itself against other forms of life".

The species in itself is not a subject, it does not act. An authority must decide on its behalf: it is obviously the world government that Attali conceives of in his essay, which could in the extreme, in order to "defend itself", decide to kill or eradicate "other forms of life". He does not say other species. One can very well imagine or create other forms of human life. Gestations in artificial uterus are in experimental phase; for example, will a child coming out of an artificial incubator be counted in the "human species"? Ideologies are not stationary. The Nazis had excluded Jews from the human “race“, what will happen in the near future?

Well, in regard of the on-going Justice short-circuiting we assist now in Julian Assange case, one can say that the direction towards a certain “state of nature“ is already on his way. The denial of his fundamental rights is quite in accordance with the horizon drawn by the “mentor of Emmanuel Macron”, namely Jacques Attali.

The death of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange be the result of a fake justice, rendered in a private Court which is not liable versus international treaties ratified by the UK government, kicked off by the judge Emma Arbuthnot who has proven links to MI5 and MI6, hence bearing deep conflicts of interest in the case, a trial took over by Vanessa Baraitser who does not even seem to know what is a fair trial, who lets attend in the Court room teenagers who have absolutely no legitimacy to be there, as if the Court was a theatre scene with special guests, or worse, a pagan ceremony where only one rule is understood by people : the man to be condemned has no right to open his mouth.

Except that these proceedings and this judgment have no legal value since they are conducted in the name of Julian Paul Assange, who is not of a birth identity, by a Grand Jury, if it has met, which can only rule on a crime committed on American soil. In order to prosecute citizen Julian Paul Assange, the United States must violate several of its amendments and all the texts of international law.

The United Kingdom, which has already violated the Vienna Convention, the Geneva Conventions, the rules of fair trial, habeas Corpus, the Convention against Torture and all human rights laws if rendition has occurred, can only convict the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange by violating the Extradition Act of 2003. This Z-series production could be laughable if a man's life wasn't at stake. The organizers are unfortunately criminals and if the citizen known as Julian Assange dies, they will be murderers. There will be premeditated murder.

After the death of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange, the tactic will then be to make politicians, Yannis Varoufakis, Jean-Luc Mélenchon, Eva Joly, appear who will cry out for crime against humanity while telling you that nothing can be done because it is the Americans and the very nasty CIA who decide. And of course, no one can stop them. But if the police and the justice system can prevent them from doing so. It is only time. They have already broken all the laws. Since when do criminals do justice?

The other reason that leads to the crime of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange is that it becomes important to privatize justice in order to strip it of all power. If we allow this privatization to take place, it is the death of civilization. It is once again feudal law and the law of retaliation that applies. The citizens holding the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange want to use his death to set up an illegal justice system that does not respect the rule of law and gives itself the right to put individuals to death at will.

Has the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange been surrendered and is he imprisoned in a dark place? Is there more than one Dark Place in the UK?

It is more than urgent to save Private Assange and have him released

The Rendition

The United Kingdom and Sweden are very much involved in rendition programmes. Numerous reports attest to this.

https://www.therenditionproject.org.uk

https://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/rendition701/updates/updates.html

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13642987.2015.104477

2https://www.theregister.com/2006/01/19/google_earth_prestwick/

https://www.statewatch.org/media/documents/news/2007/aug/scotland-reprieve-report-involvement.pd

Julian Paul Assange has been held incommunicado for at least ten years by an unknown entity in a place of lawlessness since no one has seen fit to take him out even though all the procedures concerning him are invalid.

Was there a rendition? Did he take the Guantanamo express several times to be changed from dark places and torturers as it is the case for renditions? Which governments, or parts of governments, are involved in this rendition? The Germans are overrepresented at the legal show Assange.

Are they the initiators of this rendition if it took place? Who is torturing the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange? Where is he being tortured? Is the Belmarsh prison staff involved? Is he an accomplice? Are there other prisoners in the hands of these private entities on English soil? Are they all being moved by Guantanamo Express on a regular basis? How many returns have there been in the UK? Are there any darks tickets available in the UK? In Sweden? Australia? Germany? In France?

It should be remembered that part of Belmarsh prison is managed by a private entity. Who is incarcerated there? Is it a prison that follows the rules of international law or a dark place?

A Part of Belmarsh Prison, the Thameside Prison, Griffin Manor Road Londo, SE28 0FJ, is run by the private Serco group which also provides private transfer of prisoners. Julian Assange was taken with a Serco van to 181 Marylebone Road on the 3 occasions that eyewitnesses were able to see him - on 21 October 2019, 20 December 2019 and 13 January 2020.

Is Serco as a private company involved in renditions, secret prisons and the torture of men held hostage in this illegal system?

Serco was also seen by witnesses bringing prisoners to the Old Bailey on September 7, 8 and 9.

Julian Assange had shown the 3 times we have seen him a great fear of these militia men in a private company who keep him in detention.

https://www.serco.com/

On September 9, 2020 our delegates managed to enter hall 10, which is closed to the non-accredited public. Who gives the accreditations ? Our delegates were driven out of this room after 20 minutes, while all security conditions were respected. They had time to observe that the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange was showing clear signs of abuse. He was wearing a red tie. Jennifer Robinson and Stella Morris, aka Stella or Sara Gonzalez Devant, aka Stella Smith Robertson were wearing a red dress.

Report of our delegate

http://monika-karbowska-liberte-pour-julian-assange.ovh/index.php/2020/09/23/julian-assange-julian-assange-in-front-of-the-family-at-the-old-bailey-on-september-9-2020/

Serco is also charged with rape and human trafficking in detention centres.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-36804714



https://www.biduk.org/posts/437-hidden-histories-yarl-s-wood-and-its-captive-women

During the day, WJJA's Twitter account was blocked without explanation. We are filing a complaint against Twitter for obstructing freedom of expression and hindering our work as a Human Rights Association. In the midst of a trial, this means banning information from circulating and forbidding our association to protect the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange by disseminating facts that have been recorded while he is in danger of death.

The courts that judge the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange operate as if the UK was being interfered with on its territory in the same way as in colonised countries. We can understand that this phenomenon occurs in France where Mr. Macron, acting against the sovereign interests of his own country, ceded part of the national sovereignty to Germany by the Treaty of Aachen. But the UK did the Brexit. It should have regained its full and complete sovereignty.

We therefore call on the English justice system and the justice systems of the countries involved in the Assange case, the legal institutions of sovereign countries, to investigate who in the UK, or elsewhere, is imprisoning and torturing the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange incommunicado.

Has the citizen known as Julian Assange been surrendered? Did the citizen known as Julian Assange take the Guantanamo Express and was he incarcerated and tortured in a country other than the United Kingdom?

Gantanamo Express

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13642987.2015.1044772

https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/N379P-N8068V-N44982

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/jul/26/cia-rendition-guantanamo

https://www.statewatch.org/media/documents/news/2007/aug/scotland-reprieve-report-involvement.pdf

https://www.theregister.com/2006/01/19/google_earth_prestwick/

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/detectives-probing-use-scots-airports-14078732

The UK, the USA and Germany have all ratified the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, all fundamental human rights texts, the Vienna and Geneva Conventions, the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. They therefore have a duty to respect them and to ensure that every citizen respects them on their respective territories.

We ask the French justice system and judiciary of all sovereign countries to open too an investigation to determine who incarcerated and tortured the citizen known as Julian Assange incommunicado in the name of article 223-6 of the French penal code. We recall that the citizen known as Julian Assange sent an SOS to one of the French doctors of the Human Rights Defence Association WJJA.

The UN is the guarantor of the inalienable fundamental human rights.

In 2016, it has, by the way, demanded that the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange be released, compensated and taken to a safe house.

The "judicial meeting" imposed on the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange does not respect any of the rules of fair trial. The prosecution does not present any witness or document against him. The defence does not present any witness or document in its defence.

There are an incredible number of lawyers in the room. Some of them are not members of the English Bar and therefore cannot defend the citizen known as Mr. Julian Paul Assange. Moreover, no lawyer is pleading. The charges are never studied. The citizen known as Julian Assange is never called to speak. Teenagers and people who have nothing to do in the courtroom are sitting next to the lawyers: teenagers and the entrepreneur MC Mc Grath, whom Gareth Peirce claims to be his articling student. There is a contradiction between the status of entrepreneur and trainee lawyer.

M.C. Mc Grath is not an intern, he is a hacker and activist. He is of American origin and is based in Berlin as the Wau Holland Stiftung, the Chaos Computer Club, Andy Müller Maguhn and Bernd Fix.

MC Mc Grath created Transparency Toolkit in 2013 and Ice Watch which collect Data for the benefit of oppressed people.

Like the Wikileaks portal, MC Mc Grath's companies are appropriating and privatizing data that should be disseminated unfiltered in the public domain. In fact, he intervened in Wikileaks. MC Mc Grath was already working on Wikileaks in 2013. Another Wikileaks hacker who escaped the two Wikileaks War Room.

MC Mc Grath on RT Germany.

https://youtu.be/ie8Is7wQl0M

https://exposingtheinvisible.org/en/films/mc-mcgrath-watching-the-watchers/

Tranparency Toolkit is in link with Thiel Foundation Echoing Green, Open Technology Found and Open Soros

All these violations of the law led one of the members of the WJJA association to file a complaint against Judge Vanessa Baraitser and Niki Konstantinidou againts judge Emma Aburthnot.

Complaint against judge Vanessa Baraitser misconduct

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/complaint-over-judge-vanessa-baraitser-missconduct-véronique/

Complaint against judge Emma Aberthnot

https://www.legrandsoir.info/affaire-julian-assange-plainte-contre-la-juge-lady-emma-arbuthnot.html

Release Request of Political Prisoner prisoner Julian Paul Assange

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/political-prisoner-julian-paul-assange-release-12-v%25C3%25A9ronique/

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/political-prisoner-julian-paul-assange-release-11-véronique/

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/release-request-10-political-prisoner-julian-paul-véronique/

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/release-request-9-political-prisoner-julian-paul-véronique/

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/release-request-8-political-prisoner-julian-paul-véronique/

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/wjja-release-request-7-political-prisoner-julian-paul-véronique/

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/release-request-6-political-prisoner-julian-paul-véronique/

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/5th-request-release-political-prisoner-julian-paul-véronique/

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/release-request-political-prisoner-julian-paul-court-véronique/https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/new-release-request-political-prisoner-julian-paul-véronique/

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/request-number-1-release-political-prisoner-julian-paul-véronique/

Report 1 Political Prisoner Julian Paul Assange

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/situation-report-1-political-prisoner-julian-assange-véronique/

Request for an investigation into human rights violations and request for the immediate release of political prisoner Julian Paul Assange to UN

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/request-investigation-human-rights-violations-release-véronique/

In the course of their investigations, our delegates realised that some witnesses were afraid to speak to us even if they expressed the intention to do so. From all of our interviews with witnesses, it appears that some people are being pressured, threatened or blackmailed. It would also appear that some people were trapped the way some citizens were trapped by J. Edgar Hoover's teams. By filing this complaint against a wide range of offenders, we hope to free their word.

One our informant said : "I told you one and again we're gonna have to forgive all thes bad guys tied to child sex traffiking because they were mostly all stolen orphans raised to be child sex traffikers and I pretty confident that includes Stella. Stella is history because I said so, and it's as simple as that. "

While the acts of which some of these individuals are accused may be serious, it is important to encourage those who have committed crimes under duress to speak out without fear of swift justice.

The various judicial bodies should also help those who are being blackmailed or threatened to speak out. Our informants told us that many citizens, politicians, businessmen, journalists and celebrities have been knowingly trapped in hotel rooms with children. Is 3 Hans Crescent Street one of those brothels where illegal sex with children has been filmed for the purpose of blackmail or threats?

This procedure should lead to the release of the victims as well as the criminals. The debates should be public and accessible to all.

Justice will also have to identify with precision the torturers, those that some of our informants call the "dog masters" or the "owners". They are the organizers and beneficiaries of trafficking in human beings and children as well as, for the most part, consumers. Our informants spoke of "orphan thieves".

It is urgent that the facts highlighted in this complaint be disclosed to the general public. Many lives are at stake, most probably those of many children.

This is all the more important as the treaty on safe, orderly and regular migration validates the movement of children only in the context of migratory exchange for work. There is no reason for children to migrate alone. It is the open door to all kinds of trafficking.

The same treaty validates administrative detention camps. It is the open door to abusive incarcerations and massive violations of fundamental human rights

Who is legally responsible for the Wikileaks portal?

WikiLeaks is not a medium. It is a project, "Project 04 WikiLeaks – Defend Freedom of Expression", developed by the German Wau Holland Foundation in 2009.

The people responsible for this project are Andy Müller Maguhn, Bernd Fix, Klaus Schleisieck, Jens Ohlig, Hendrik Fulda and Winfried Motzkus.

Andy Müller Maguhn, Bernd Fix, Klaus Schleisieck, Jens Ohlig and Hendrik Fulda are the directors of the 04 WikiLeaks project. They are the principals. The citizen known as Julian Assange works as project manager for Andy Müller Maghun and Wau Holland foundation.

The citizen known as Julian Assange has limited decision-making powers. That's written in Wau Holland's foundation activity report.

Wau Holland's foundation activity report

http://www.wauland.de/media/2011_Jahresbericht.pdf

The Court of California ruled in 2008 a conflict between Julius Baer bank and WikiLeaks

In this judgement, WikiLeaks was stated as “an entity of unknown form“ whose domain names, WikiLeaks.org and  collateralmurder.wikileaks.org, belong to John Shipton via the company Dynadot.

John Shipton is liable to WikiLeaks publications. Julian Assange not !

The Julius Baer judgement ruled in favour of Mr. John Shipton and recognised his right to publish sensitive data belonging to a Swiss bank. It does not matter how his data was obtained.
.

This judgment sets a precedent. If the freedom to freely disseminate sensitive information has been granted to an ordinary citizen and an entity of unknown form called Wikileaks, then it is clear that any citizen is entitled to do so, including the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange.

Moreover, it is worth recalling that the right to information and expression is an inalienable right guaranteed by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, all the texts relating to human rights, the American First Amendment and the French Constitution.

We recall that an inalienable right is a right that cannot be withdrawn, that cannot be taken away, that belongs in an intangible way to someone, to something.

This is the case of the right to physical integrity and the right to movement violated by many countries, of which the United Kingdom is one, in the midst of the so-called Covid pandemic.

Judgement Julius Baer

https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1737559/bank-julius-baer-co-ltd-v-WikiLeaks/

http://www.dmlp.org/threats/julius-baer-bank-and-trust-v-WikiLeaks

The first persons and legal entities that might be sued for publications on the Wikileaks portal are the following : Andy Müller Maguhn, Bernd Fix, Klaus Schleisieck, Jens Ohlig and Hendrik Fuld, Wau Holland Foundation and John Shipton.

We call on the English judiciary, the US judiciary, the French judiciary to open an investigation to determine why those responsible for the publications on the Wikileaks portal are not incriminated and why they allow their employee, the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange, to be incriminated in their place?

We urge the English judiciary, the US judiciary, the French judiciary, the Swedish judiciary and all judiciary of sovereign country authorities to open an investigation to determine why the indictment documents were written under the common name of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange as this makes them illegal. All procedures are therefore invalid.

We request the judicial institutions of the sovereign government of the United Kingdom and the judicial institutions of all sovereign countries to open an investigation to determine the identity of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange (name of birth, place of birth, birth register in which he is registered, known domiciles) and of his relatives.

The identity of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange is not clearly determined. As a corollary, neither is that of his children.

There are also no clearly established official links between the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange and his alleged parents, the citizen known as John Shipton and the citizen known as Christine Ann Hawkins.

The citizen known as Julian Assange himself says that he only called himself Julian Paul Hawkins during only the first years of his life. Why?

Questions that arise about the identity of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange and that of his relatives

After investigation, we found that in the Assange case, the question of the identities of the different citizens involved in the case was crucial.

Julian Paul Assange, aka Julian Paul Hawkins as Stella Morris, aka Stella or Sara Gonzalez Devant, aka Stella Smith Robertson are names of use or aliases. Judge Baraitser does not appear on any official legal paper. No one introduces her when she enters the court. The first name Vanessa only appears in the press. Jennifer Robinson, who is in the courtroom, is not a litigator and is not a member of the London Bar. Is she a solicitor? Her name is Jennifer Robinson. Stella Morris aka Stella or Sara Gonzalez Devant, aka Stella Smith Robertson also claims to be a lawyer but is not registered with the English Bar. She is in the courtroom when she is not entitled to plead and claims to be the companion of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange. She has no business being on the legal team. Seats are reserved at the family as in theatre, but no presumed family member of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange presents identification to prove who he or she is, to access at these places. Moreover, in the Assange family no one is named Assange.

On the other hand, the delegates of the human rights association WJJA have to fight and queue for hours to enter the courtroom even though they are in possession of official papers from the French Republic.

We call on the judicial authorities of sovereign countries to open an investigation to determine whether citizens involved in the Assange affair have usurped identities or functions.

Indeed, an alleged offender can only be tried under his or her birth name. A lawyer can only plead if he or she is registered at the bar and has a law degree.

However, we have proven that the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange alias Julian Paul Hawkins was not tried under his birth name. It is therefore legitimate to believe that other citizens involved in the Assange case are hiding under false names to escape prosecution or commit offenses.

Citizens appearing at a trial under a false name, intervening in a trial under a false name, violate the rules of fair trial and the most basic rules of law in a democracy.

Family ties must be proven. In court, the rule is to prove with official documents, not with mere verbal statements. People who lie and pretend to be who they are not are acting like crooks.

Assange’s identity documents page 13 and page 20

https://www.planv.com.ec/sites/default/files/anexo_3.pdf

Shipton case

John Shipton is married to Mrs. Catherine Ann Barber who works at Imperial College of London. The Imperial College managed the Covid crisis on a global scale and imposed confinement, MKultra-style torture, on populations in disrespect of the fundamental right of free movement guaranteed by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Mrs Catherine Ann Barber Shipton is the mother of Gabriel Barber Shipton who claims to be the brother of Mr Julian Assange. The problem is that Catherine Ann Barber Shipton, now Catherine Ann Shipton, was working with the biochemist James Barber. James Barber, dead in January 2020, was fellow of Australian Academy of science and member of the Royal Swedish Academy of science.

James Barber is linked with two countries involved in the Assange case, Australia where Assange was raised in the family cult and Sweden where he was persecuted. James Barber was also Visiting Canon Professor to Nanyang Technological University.

About Jame Barber of Imperial College of London

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Barber_(biochemist)

We call upon the judiciary of the sovereign government of Great Britain and judiciary of all sovereign states to open an enquiry to determine what is the relationship between Mr. James Barber, Catherine Ann Barber Shipton, now Catherine Ann Shipton, Gabriel Barber Shipton, John Shipton and Julian Assange? Who is the Gabriel Barber Shipton father? John Shipton? James Barber? Why is he called Barber since his mother no longer has that name?

We call upon the judiciary authorities of the all sovereign governments to open an enquiry to determine if the name John Shipton is indeed a birth name or a common name or pseudonym.

In the Assange case, many people confessed to being known by common names. This is incompatible with legal proceedings of this nature. The identities of all stakeholders must be clearly established. This is the legal rule.

The citizen known as Julian Paul Assange does not endorse John Shipton's family name. Mr. Shipton did not recognize him at birth. Mr. Shipton's name does not appear on the birth certificate. Mr. Julian Assange publicly said that his "father was more than an abstract to him" (Risk documentary). Andrew O'Hagan, the author of the "Unauthorized Biography" writes himself that Mr. John Shipton did not have the attitude of a father on the day of Julian Assange's birthday party at Vaughan Smith's house.

John Shipton never took care of the citizen known as Julian Assange when he was a child. When did John Shipton appear in the life of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange? Where does Shipton live and work? Why does he own the collateralmurder.wikileaks.org and wikileaks.org domain names? Why does he let his son take legal action when he is liable to the publications through the Wikileaks portal?
What are John Shipton's links with the Wau Holland Foundation and Mr. Andy Muller Maguhn?

Is the citizen known as John Shipton's involved in the Wau Holland foundation? There must be an agreement between the Wau Holland foundation and the citizen known as John Shipton since he is the owner of the domain names Wikileaks.org and collateralmurder.wikileaks.org
Large sums of money are at stake. There necessarily have been contracts agreed between the various parties involved. This is the rule in business.

In the Assange family, no one is called Assange...

None of the citizen known as Julian Assange's relatives are named Assange and the people who gravitate around him have many identities or present themselves under false identities. This is the case of Stella Morris who is known by many surnames. She says herself that Stella Morris is a nickname.

The identity of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange is also not clearly established. This emerges from the documents he provided for political asylum and Ecuadorian nationality.

As far as his identity is concerned, the citizen known as Julian Paul Hawkins or the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange do not seem to have a very clear idea of his identity.

So, Julian Paul Assange's name was Julian Paul Hawkins during the first years of his childhood. He also says, "My name, as recorded therein, was at this time"… No one with a proven identity and known parentage says such a thing.

In a developed democratic society with a birth register, a first name and surname are assigned for life until death unless the person takes formal legal steps to change them. Julian Paul Assange talks about his identity as if it were not his own. He adds that he changes his name when his mother marries, but he does not give his mother's husband's first or last name. He doesn't say Christine Hawkins becomes Mrs. Christine Assange. He's saying Christine Hawkins' name is being converted to Christine Assange. The term "convirtiendose" is more suggestive of a name change than a marriage. "Christine Hawkins” becomes Christine Assange, not Mrs. Christine Assange.

In no official document does the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange specify his father-in-law's first name. The media present him as Bret, aka Richard, Assange, director of a theatre company.

Although the storytelling tells that Brett, Richard Assange is deceased, we pray to the justice of the sovereign government of the United Kingdom to determine whether he is indeed the stepfather of Mrs. Christine Hawkins, the alleged mother of Julian Paul Assange.

We further ask the justice of the sovereign government of the United Kingdom to investigate whether Christine Hawkins is a birth name or a nickname and whether Christine Hawkins married a Brett Richard Assange. In which marriage register is this marriage recorded?

After all, Mrs. Christine Ann Hawkins was the wife or girlfriend of Leif Meynel, aka Leif Hamilton, son (legitimate or stolen?) of the cult guru, the citizen known as Ann Hamilton Byrne, aka Grâce Victoria Edwards, aka Evlyne Harris, aka Anna Riley. Christine Ann Hawkins is perhaps still under the influence of one of the ramifications of the Family Cult, which became Santaniketan Park Association in Australia. This is a matter for the courts to determine.

The citizen known as Julian Paul Assange, aka Julian Paul Hawkins, explains that he uses the new name of his alleged mother on all official documents, including his passport, without any acknowledgement of paternity or adoption having been made by a Brett Richard Assange. Julian Paul Assange has not written an official request for a name change to the Australian authorities.

Since the citizen known as Mr. Julian Paul Assange declares that he has not taken any official steps to have this name officially become the site, any action taken under this name is, as far as he is concerned, legally null and void.

The birth certificate of Julian Paul Hawkins has no legal value if it does not bear any signature. Christine Ann Hawkins’ signature is not visible on Julian Paul Hawkins' birth certificate and therefore, from a legal point of view, we have no assurance from available documents that she is her mother. John Shipton does not appear on the birth certificate, there is thus no proof that he is the father of Mr. Julian Paul Hawkins and even less Julian Paul Assange father.

There is thus no published official document which proves Julian Paul Hawkins official identity, nor his parents identity, from a legal point of view.

Mr. Julian Paul Hawkins was not adopted by Mr. Bret Richard Assange. He has not made an official request for a name change. The name Julian Paul Assange is therefore only a common name, a pseudonym, an alias. He cannot use it on official documents.

There are no official published documents establishing Hawkins or Assange naming. It would appear that the citizen known as Julian Paul Hawkins, aka Mr. Julian Paul Assange, aka Mendax, has no official identity. Could he be a stolen orphan?

Therefore, he could not properly create a media outlet, neither properly run a production company, nor sign a contract, nor have a regular credit card or passport neither under the name Hawkins, nor under the name Assange. Nor can he or she have been granted political asylum or nationality with a nickname that has not been validated by a legal institution.

This question of identity and filiation of Julian Assange is crucial.

Firstly, because the filiation and identity of minor children are at stake. Indeed, Stella Morris, aka Stella or Sara Gonzalez Devant, aka Stella Smith Robertson claims that two little boys are her children and Julian Assange's children. However, Mrs. Stella Morris herself confessed that Stella Morris was a pseudonym without ever giving her official name. There is no evidence that one of the other names she gives is her birth name. In fact, nothing proves that the two little boys are her legitimate children. She claims that the father of these children is Julian Assange but he has never publicly acknowledged this paternity. Did he recognise these two little boys? Under what name? The photos showing him with these children are not evidence.

First of all, they can be faked. Second, the children in the photos are too small to make a link with the children that Stella Morris complacently presents on videos in 2020. Julian Assange is himself incapable of giving a clear identity. How can a citizen who is only known by a common name and not by a birth name legally recognise children?

What is the birth name of these two little boys? In which birth register, from which country are they registered? In which hospital were they born? Do they live with Stella Morris, aka Stella or Sara Gonzalez Devant, aka Stella Smith Robertson?

What is the birth name of Stella Morris? In which birth register, from which country does her name appear? What is Julian Assange's birth name? In which birth register, from which country does his name appear? What is the surname of the two little boys since they can neither be called Morris, which is a pseudonym, nor Assange, which is a common name. In which birth register, from which country does their name appear?

It is vital that all the light be shed on the identity of Stella Morris aka Stella or Sara Gonzalez Devant, aka Stella Smith Robertson, Julian Assange and these two little boys. Many children disappear every year. So, when it comes to children's lives, legislators must take every precaution to protect them. In the case of Julian Paul Assange, this is all the more important since he was raised in a sect where children changed identities, had no identity of their own and went from educators to educators.

Julian Paul Assange may never have had an official identity himself. He may be one of the child martyrs, without birth name, stolen by Ann Hamilton Byrne from legitimate parents, tortured and placed from Auntie to Auntie.

We therefore ask the English justice system to ensure that Mr. Julian Paul Assange has an official identity, that he is not the victim of the sect in which he was raised, and that he does not remain a hostage of the sect. We call on the British, Australian, American and French courts to investigate to ensure that the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange was not born in the family cult, was not abducted from his parents at birth and was not subjected to Mkultra like treatment as a child.

We therefore ask the English judiciary and all sovereign country judiciary to ensure that the two little boys whom Mrs. Stella Morris aka Stella or Sara Gonzalez Devant aka Stella Smith Robertson presents as her children and those of Assange have an identity consistent with that of their alleged parents.

We call on the British, Australian, American French courts and all courts of sovereign country to investigate to ensure that these two little boys were not born into the family cult or another sect, were not abducted from their parents at birth and were not subject to MKultra-like treatment.

Medical Child Abuse

http://www.anilaggrawal.com/ij/vol_004_no_001/reviews/tb/page006.html

We ask the English courts to ensure that Mrs. Stella Morris aka Stella or Sara Gonzalez Devant aka Stella Smith Robertson does not belong to a sect related to the Family Cult.

Indeed, the sect was dissolved but re-formed in Australia under the name Santiniketan Park Association or Great White Brotherhood and the Family Cult guru, Ann Hamilton Byrne owned a property in England.

1970s : Hamilton-Byrne buys Broom Farm in Langton Green, England and a property in the Catskills, New York near Muktananda's ashram. She also marries Bill.

In Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Family_(Australian_New_Age_group)https://www.vice.com/en_au/article/d757dy/a-look-inside-australias-most-notorious-cult-the-family

She was therefore able to restructure a sect on English soil during the seventies, around the presumed date of birth of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange.

The American state cannot prosecute a man without identity. In law and international law, a citizen can only be prosecuted under his or her birth name.

This problem of identity is important because no legal proceedings are initiated using the common name of the accused. Legal proceedings only use the name of birth. However, during the hearings,  Julian Assange presents himself solely under his pseudonym. If the procedure were legal, Julian Assange would present himself as follows : "Mr. X, aka Mr. Assange or known as Mr Assange". This is not the case. This procedural defect alone invalidates this whole judicial masquerade.

During the hearings, neither the judge, (Vanessa) Baraitser, nor the prosecutor Clair Dobbin, nor the lawyers uttered the name Julian Assange or the term Wikileaks.

These hearings do not judge anyone since "Julian Assange" is not the official identity, nether birth name of the man who being judged.

Judge (Vanessa) Baraitser should ask Julian Assange to give his birth name but she just asks him to come forward and give his date of birth, which he does hesitantly, with great difficulty. During the hearings, Julian Assange seems reluctant to state his identity. Why is this? Why do the judge and the prosecution never pronounce the name Assange or WikiLeaks?

Are they aware of this procedural defect? An individual can only be judged by his or her birth name. Assange's birth name is never pronounced. Why is this?

We repet again because it's very important. Birth identity is one of the crucial elements in the Assange case, including in relation to members of the English Crown. In the Assange case, too many citizens appear to have no birth name.

We therefore request the English justice system to open an investigation to determine the birth name of Julian Paul Assange.

Until Julian Assange's identity and birth name are clearly established, no procedure concerning him can be considered legal.

The citizen known as Julian Paul Assange is said to have six children. The judiciary of the sovereign government of the UK must formally identify them and ensure their legal identity.

Informants, wishing to remain anonymous because they are very afraid, informed the WJJA that the citizen known as Julian Assange is said to be the father of six children.

According to the storytelling, Julian Assange would have a son in his thirties or so, named Daniel but whose surname can be neither Assange, Hawkins nor Shipton. What is the surname of the alleged son Daniel of the citizen known as Assange? There is only one photo of this son who never came to see his father at 3 Hans Crescent Street and did not attend any hearings. With the two children that Stella Morris, aka Stella or Sara Gonzalez Devant, aka Stella Smith Robertson, claims to be hers and Assange’s, that makes three children. Lawyers Eric Dupont-Moretti and Juan Branco spoke of a French child with an unknown mother. In France, rumour has it that Céline Meneses, former assistant to Jean-Luc Mélenchon, is the french wife and mother of Julian Assange's French child because she stayed several times in the building at 3 Hans Crescent Street. Another rumour says that this French woman is an activist met in hacker circles with whom he has a daughter who would be about fifteen years old today.

We ask this French woman to come out into the open in order to put an end to all her rumours. In view of the danger of death to which the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange is exposed, it becomes essential that she puts pressure on the French government to grant him political asylum

While the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange had six children, two are missing and must also be clearly identified.

We ask the judiciary of the sovereign government of the United Kingdom, the French judiciary, the Australian judiciary, the American judiciary and all judiciary government to kindly open an investigation to ensure that these six children exist, are not in the hands of an offshoot of the family cult and are not in danger. We urge them, once their identities are established, to do everything possible to protect them and their interests.

In the Assange case, false identities are too many and to used for criminal purposes and to evade sovereign judicial systems.

Other problems of identity arise.

Anna Ardin, aka Svea Anna Carolina Ardin, aka Anna Bernardin

"Anna Ardin (Svea Anna Karolina Ardin), born in 1979 in Visby, worked as a press secretary and political secretary for Sweden’s Christian social democrats (…)

For the espionage in other countries, the secret service use churches and their international departments, red cross, UNICEF and similar, of course, the CIA can use Swedish spies, to hide who really spy in Palestine or Somalia. The working address of Anna Ardin in 2017 : Forum, Hantverkargatan 3F, 112 21 Stockholm. (…)

https://www.autistici.org/againstservants/sweden.html

Barak Obama

We did not work on Barack Hussein Obama II aka Barry Soetoro, aka Soebarkah but our attention was drawn to Christopher Earl Strunk’s testimony about him. Mr. Strunk is testifying in a complaint brought by United State of America, District of Colombia, against Kevin Clinesmith.

The first of the correlations we can make with the testimony of Christofer Earl Strunk is the multiple identities of Barak Hussein Obama, reminiscent of the multiple identities of Stella Morris, aka Stella or Sara Gonzalez Front, aka Stella Smith Robertson. The second correlation is that we have brought to light that individuals involved in the Assange case were probably working under assumed names or pseudonyms and, for some of them, were connected with the CIA.

In addition, many of them, including Antony, Selwyn Tabatznik and John Shipton, are either connected with Kenya or South Africa, as seems to be the case with Barack Hussein Obama II aka Barry Soetoro, aka Soebarkah. These two points seemed sufficiently troubling to us to allow us to imagine that Barack Hussein Obama II may have links with the private entities that illegally imprison and torture the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange. This is all the more legitimate since Barak Obama and Hilary Clinton are at the origin of the persecution of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange since they have, among other things, created two Wikileaks War Rooms. one at the State Department and one at the Pentagon.

The mission of these two chambers was to put the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange out of business. However, our investigation has proven that neither Barak Obama nor Hilary Clinton has any interest in having the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange testify about them if the facts against them prove to be true and are the subject of criminal proceedings

Serco works in many sectors and is an important player in the city of London. It transports prisoners including the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange who has shown tangible signs of fear when they are at guards side. It operates part of Belmarsh Prison and appears to work in conjunction with the Crown of England, itself involved in the Assange case by The Virginia City of London, as we have demonstrated in this complaint.

Members of their staff are involved in rape in camps under their management. We are filing a complaint against the company Serco (see above). With regard to all these points, it seems to us that the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange is in great danger because he is in the hands of those whose crimes he witnessed, crimes he denounced and of which he was also the victim. He is a witness for the prosecution and must be protected as a matter of urgency.

We therefore call upon the sovereign judicial authorities of the United States of America to publicly denounce and put an end to what we have proven to be a sham trial and to ensure that all those involved in the deception, either as criminals or as hostages and victims, publicly confess in the media and before a public court of citizens their participation and degree of involvement in this planetary masquerade.

If they are among them "stolen orphans" as some of our informants have told us, they must testify to the torture they endured so that an end can be put to all the human trafficking and paedocriminality networks in which they were sequestered. Some of them are clearly linked to the Assange affair.

Even if these "stolen orphans" have been instrumentalized to commit criminal acts or crimes, sovereign states must show leniency towards them because they are hostages of a ruthless criminal system, the first victims of slavery networks. They must benefit from mitigating circumstances and must have the help and support of the states in order to be entitled to a second chance. They must benefit from mitigating circumstances and must have the help and support of the states in order to be entitled to a second chance. Sovereign states have failed in their missions by failing to protect them. They owe them reparation.

According to the Universal Declaration of the Rights of the Child, every sovereign state has the duty to ensure the safety and absolute well-being of a child residing on its territory.

With regard to all the points developed below concerning Barack Hussein Obama II alias Barry Soetoro, alias Soebarkah, we ask the sovereign government of the United States of America and all sovereign governments of the world to kindly open an investigation to ensure that there is no link between him and the entities or persons involved in this complaint.

We call upon the sovereign government of the United States of America and all sovereign governments of the world to open an investigation to ensure that Barack Hussein Obama II alias Barry Soetoro, alias Soebarkah, is not involved in human trafficking or criminal networks of children.

We call upon the sovereign government of the United States of America and all sovereign governments of the world to open an investigation to determine what role Serco is playing in the incommunicado confinement and torture of the citizen who embodies the Julian Paul Assange concept.

Christopher Earl Strunk's comments resonate with what we explain later in this complaint. It would appear that this extra-constitutional and extra-territorial state is based on two fundamental legal voids, one relating to the status of the dominions, tax and legal havens, and other private entities belonging to the Crown of England, and the other to the Navigation Act of 1660, which allows international law to be circumvented by using as a lever a feudal law that was never abolished.

This state of affairs puts the sovereignty and stability of the American state in great danger and creates a geopolitical imbalance conducive to all kinds of excesses, including war.



Therefore, we request the United States of America and all sovereign states to open investigations to determine who runs, without the consent of the citizens, this extra-constitutional and extra-territorial state in order to put an end to its action contrary to the laws of democracy and for each country to regain its sovereignty. (See demonstration below)

Judge (Vanessa) Baraitser

Judge Baraitser appears at Julian Assange's hearing on 21 October and conducts all trial hearings until 1 October 2020. Judge Baraitser continuously violates the fundamental rights of prisoner Julian Assange and violates the fair trial procedure.

She is allegedly a magistrate judge appointed by the Judicial Appointment Commission. Her name appears on the list of district judges on the UK Department of Justice's justice.gov website. The problem is that there is no first name on this list in front of the surname Baraitser who was appointed as a judge in 2011.

The judge whom Wikijustice delegates were able to observe 19 times from 21 October 2019 to 9 September 2020 never shows up in the courtroom. She is never introduced by name by a bailiff. Her name is never written on the public documents posted in the courtroom on the doors or the notice board. Her name is not written on a display in the courtroom. So the public does not know who is judging, which is very problematic.
« Vanessa's » first name was given to the public by the press present in Room 1 of Westminster Court on 21 October 2019. Since then the name and surname has been propagated and broadcast thousands of times by the media and by gullible activists.

But there is no evidence that this person is called by that name. This woman looks like a twin to another public figure whom the media portrays as "Vanessa Baraitser's sister". Lisa Baraitser is a professor at the Birbeck College of Psychosocial Studies at the University of London. She specialises in gender, sexuality, motherhood, feminism, queer theories and psychoanalysis. Lisa Baraitser is a clinical psychologist and psychotherapist. Her 2018 book on motherhood is prefaced by the famous American queer feminist sociologist Judit Butler. The public media such as the BBC promote it. Lisa Baraitser is also the director of the theatre company founded in 1995 by Simon Goodenegough Bayly a partner of this father Michael. She became Director of the Pur Theater in 2006.

www.bbk.ac.uk/news/judith-butler-and-lisa-baraitser-2013-enduring-and-broken-time-2

www.bbk.ac.uk/psychosocial/our-staff/academic/lisa-baraitser

Lisa Baraitser conducts lectures in Germany and is responsible together with Laura Salisbury for a program to monitor the mental isolation of the population during Covid time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTjLTLOZ-Z4

https://vimeo.com/449936919e

Her company of Pure Theatre registered under the business number 02930096 does not employ any staff and does not bring in any money, but has a full activity and she is the director of it in 2015-2020. The theatre was founded in 1995 by Dr Simon Mark Goodenough Bayly who is the director until 2015. Andrew Pulver, Kate Person, Kate Stratton, Benjamin Simms and Sara Holloway ran the theatre with Baraitser and Goodenough from 2000 to nowadays.



www.theatrepur.org/pastprods.html

This theatre is defined as "a psychological experience" and as "psychological therapy" and in his annual report as an « school for adults ».
Witnesses have always perceived Julian Assange's hearings as plays in which psychological violence is staged and implemented on the spectators as well as on the actors of the "play" in the "court".

Maybe Lisa Baraitser is Judge Baraitser? She has the social position to be appointed as a magistrate judge since it is enough to be an honest citizen and to have 26 half days per year to apply to sit in a magistrate courtroom. The Judicial Commission favours women and academics to be appointed as magistrate judges.

https://www.judiciary.uk/about-the-judiciary/judges-career-paths/becoming-a-magistrate/

https://www.judiciary.uk/about-the-judiciary/judges-career-paths/becoming-a-judge/

Lisa Baraitser also has the ability to organise such a "play" because she has many years of experience in directing her "pyschological theatre". Furthermore, witnesses testify that her physical appearance, voice, diction, way of speaking is very similar or even similar to the voice and physical appearance of "Vanessa" Baraitser.

Lisa Baraitser is also a director in the Springdale Company Limited N°06968455 created in 2009 to manage the building at 15 Springdale Road in London.

Lisa Baraitser therefore has a life, an identity, an address and owns companies. Vanessa Baraitser does not exist socially, there is no proof of her identity. Only the media repeats the name "Vanessa".

The founder of Lisa Baraitser's Pur Theatre is Simon Goodenough Bayly who owns at 1 Cooper Line, also home of the Pure Theatre, London Medical Database Limited in partnership with Michael Baraitser, presented as the father of Lisa and Paula Baraitser and perhaps "Vanessa" the judge of Julian Assange.

Simon Goodenough Bayly has owned the Pure Theater since 1995 together with Guardian journalist Andrew Pulver. He is also a partner of Michael Baraitser at the London Medical Database.

The third shareholder of the London Medical Database Limited is Professor Robin Winter is a professor of genetics.

Professor Robin Winter was Professor of Clinical Dysmorphology and Clinical Genetics at the Institute of Child Health, London. and Honorary Consultant in Clinical Genetics, at Great Ormond Street Children's Hospital, London. Dr Michael Baraitser was formerly Consultant in Clinical Genetics, at Great Ormond Street Children's Hospital, London.

The London Medical Database has 288,000 pounds of assets in 2015 but is dissolved in 2018 without any understanding of the nature of its business or why it went bankrup.t

The company sold databases of datas of genes and genomes.

https://www.face2gene.com/lmd-history/

https://www.ramex.com/title.asp?id=2937&pid=21963

Michael Baraitser is believed to be the father of Lisa Baraitser, Paula Baraister and Alexandra Baraitser. He is credited of 3 children. There is no trace of Vanessa.

https://genmedhist.eshg.org/fileadmin/content/website-layout/interviewees-attachments/Baraitser,%20Michael.pdf

He is a geneticist and author of books on genetic diseases.

https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-genetics-of-neurological-disorders-9780192628145?cc=us&lang=en&

He is said to be behind the classification of the genetic disease called Nicolaides -Baraitser syndrom or Winter Baraitser, named after Professor Robin Winter with whom he worked and created the company London Medical Data base.

https://fre.acousticbiotech.com/severe-forms-baraitserwinter-syndrome-are-caused-actb-mutations-rather-than-actg1-mutations-783532

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolaides-Baraitser_syndrome-Baraitser_syndrome

It was above all Professor Robin Winter who was at the origin of the discoveries on genetic malformations of embryos at the Great Ormon Hospital in London while Baraitser wrote his books and was in charge of the sale of the genome with the London Medical Data Base.

https://www.clingensoc.org/about-us/robin-winter-prize/

Michael Baraitser does not appear to have a professorship or to have been a health professional, other than an associate of Professor Winter at the Great Ormond Street Hospital for Sick Children.

https://www.nature.com/articles/5201193

It is astonishing to discover that Michael Baraitser is in charge of the sale of genomes from the London medical data base when a gene-therapy campaign is being abusively imposed on the citizens of the world in violation of the Nuremberg Code. This is all the more disturbing as Judge Baraitser's identity is not clearly established, nor is her status as a judge who can preside over hearings under international law.

In view of all the irregularities in which Judge (Vanessa) Baraitser is involved and as it is impossible even to find any trace of her anywhere, it is legitimate to ensure that activity of all Baraitser companies is legal, all important so as the Assange Case seems to be linked to trafficking in human beings and more particularly children, this trafficking seemingly involving hospitals and doctors.

It is all the more important to investigate because through the presence of Anthony Selwyn, aka Tony, Tabatznik, director of the Bertha Foundation, the Assange case is related to the pharmaceutical field and South Africa (See below).

Members of the Tabatznik family are on the board of directors of medical companies.

Furthermore, it should be remembered that Tony Tabatznik's father is involved in illegal medical experiments in concentration camps in South Africa.

Anthony, Selwyn, aka Tony, visited the building at 3 Hans Crescent Street several times when the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange was sequestered there.

It seems that Anthony Selwyn Tabatznik has an important role in the case Assange. It would therefore be important to determine what links they might have with the Baraitser family.

We call on the judicial authorities of sovereign countries to open an investigation to ensure that the sale of the genomes data handled by Michael Baraitser complies with the rules of medical ethics and international law, that no children or human beings are subjected to medical experimentation, and that the funds allocated to the hospital are not channelled through other Baraitser companies.

It is noticeable to find the name Lady Diana, Diana Frances Spencer, aka Lady Diana, as the president of the Great Ormond Street Hospital for Childhood Diseases (also called Peter Pan hospital, and including Genetic Disease department), where Michael Baraitser worked for a long time.

Let us recall that the Crown of England, via the City of London, appears to be a player in the Assange Affair, implicated in the persecution, incommunicado detention and torture of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange.

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Ormond_Street_Hospital

In the light of this information, we ask the judicial authorities of sovereign countries to kindly reopen an investigation to ensure that there is no link between the death of Diana Frances Spencer, aka Lady Diana, and the discovery of illegal medical experiments on children in this hospital.

We recall that Diana Frances Spencer is the only one, together with Philip of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg, whose identity and lineage is clearly established within the Windsor-Mountbatten family. Through her marriage and before her divorce to Charles, Prince of Wales, Diana Frances Spencer should be named Diana of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg as well as her two sons, Harry and William.

About Charles Spencer complaints

https://www.courrier-picard.fr/id142763/article/2020-11-21/le-frere-de-lady-di-pas-satisfait-de-lenquete-ouverte-sur-lentretien-choc-de-sa

https://www.purepeople.com/article/lady-diana-son-frere-charles-spencer-hypocrite-se-fait-detruire_a247210/1

https://people.com/royals/princess-dianas-brother-charles-spencer-accuses-bbc-sheer-dishonesty-over-her-famous-panorma-interview/

https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a34773076/princess-diana-brother-charles-spencer-the-crown-thoughts/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Diana,_Princess_of_Wales

https://globalnews.ca/video/3703669/er-doctor-forever-linked-with-the-tragic-death-of-princess-diana-20-years-ago

About Mohamed Alfayed complaint

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/al-fayed-launches-legal-action-in-france/

https://markzaid.com/mohamed-al-fayed-et-al-v-central-intelligence-agency-et-al/

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-diana-questions-idUSL2484626220070824

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2008/feb/19/diana.monarchy

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/mohamed-al-fayed-the-outsider-396133.htm

Paula Baraitser, Lisa's supposed sister, is a specialist in sexuality and contraception. She is a director and shareholder of SH24 C.I.C. company number 08737119 which sells tests to the NHS for sexually transmitted diseases. Since 2017 she has also been Director of the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare of the Royal College of Obstetrician and Gynecologists registred as company under the number 02804213.

Paula Baraitser is a contraceptive consultant for Kings College Hospital with a focus on adolescent girls.

https://fettle.health/clinical-team/dr-paula-baraitser

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joF57SD7ekY

By her voice and appearance she looks like Lisa aka Vanessa Baraitser.

The third Baraitser sister would be Alexandra Baraitser, artist.

www.alexandrab.org.uk

www.alexandrab.org.uk/about-ba

https://www.kettlesyard.co.uk/alexandra-baraitser/

She bears no physical resemblance to "Vanessa Baraitser". Apart from her South African origin there are not enough elements to link her to Michael, Lisa and Paula Baraitser.

https://www.museums.cam.ac.uk/index.php/events/meet-artist-alexandra-baraitser

Marion Baraitser is supposed the mother of Lisa Baraitser. She is a specialist in South African literature and was a professor at Birkbeck College Univeristy of London.

www.marionbaraitser.com